How the hell did India get to number one? ..Geoffrey Boycott

[Yoda-esque]

padosi? :haha: yes anyone who mocks India's brilliant performance in England has to be a Paki .

i am not mocking just enjoying my countries success' date=' even more so because when i began posting here, you all told me you were going to thrash us:hysterical:[/quote'] Two trolls fighting among each other :hehe:

[wobblydoggy]

Two trolls fighting among each other :hehe:

Your just upset because your team is playing like school girls, maybe we should send our womens team in 2012:giggle:

[flamy]

Amazing they actually pose as Indians to do so :hysterical: Just like they do in US and all over the world - posing as Indians to get some respect from others :haha: So they apparently have "larger" hearts but no shame :giggle:

:--D

[Jersey #10]

How the hell did you get a mic in your hands mr boycock ...oops i mean boycott.

[yoda]

How the hell did India get to number one? Sadly, this is a question a lot of us are probably asking ourselves after this drubbing. :((

[flamy]

How the hell did India get to number one? Sadly, this is a question a lot of us are probably asking ourselves after this drubbing. :((

lol wut?

[jonas10]

How did India get to #1? Well it kind of started on the road to #1 by beating your country in your own country. Something England haven't done in over a generation.

[Kinwell Smart]

just like England have done' date='by wiining matches,we won in England in 2007,England last won a series in India in ...............?[/quote'] Actually, India got there by drawing

[maniac]

Actually' date=' India got there by drawing[/quote'] Dude You probably are one of those Andy Choudary's Paki followers pretending to be 'real' British.... If you are not you probably hang around with a lot of them because your logic sounds retarded....India has been No 1 because we have played consistently over a period of time and today England deserves their ranking because they have steadily displayed some good performances to get there. India has consistently won and drawn test matches for the last 3 years home and away and hence they were no 1 ...If you still cannot understand that than :finger:...

[Yoda-esque]

Dude You probably are one of those Andy Choudary's Paki followers pretending to be 'real' British.... If you are not you probably hang around with a lot of them because your logic sounds retarded....India has been No 1 because we have played consistently over a period of time and today England deserves their ranking because they have steadily displayed some good performances to get there. India has consistently won and drawn test matches for the last 3 years home and away and hence they were no 1 ...If you still cannot understand that than :finger:...

Lol..you took that long to figure it out?

[maniac]

Lol..you took that long to figure it out?

we see this kind of garbage all the time but generally I don't comment on these trolls but this is getting ridiculous man...This hurts our intelligence and spoils the whole decorum of this forum,There are some really good Pak fans who have a reasonable debate and some who provide harmless entertainment value but seriously I don't want this forum to become another Youtube comments section or rediff.com where some of the comments are just embarrassing to read

[nballa]

i've been saying this for the past three years. we are not number 1, by any stretch of the imagination. number 1 batting side maybe. overall i'd say no 3 at best and i'm being very generous. some of these fellas don't even look like they belong in a sporting field.

[saneindian]

Quite simple Mr Boycott. Thrashed the Aussies by 372 runs and 172 runs Chased down 387 on a 5th day minefield of a pitch against your team Thrashed the Kiwis by 10 wickets Thumped the then no 2 and the future no 1 Sri Lanka by an innings and 144 runs and then again by an innings and 24 runs Now those results don't sound much different to what your team has done or do you think anything that happened before Ashes 2009 doesn't count?

[Guest Gunner]

Dude You probably are one of those Andy Choudary's Paki followers pretending to be 'real' British.... If you are not you probably hang around with a lot of them because your logic sounds retarded....India has been No 1 because we have played consistently over a period of time and today England deserves their ranking because they have steadily displayed some good performances to get there. India has consistently won and drawn test matches for the last 3 years home and away and hence they were no 1 ...If you still cannot understand that than :finger:...

Lol..you took that long to figure it out?

He is not even in England. :winky:

[saneindian]

i've been saying this for the past three years. we are not number 1' date= by any stretch of the imagination. number 1 batting side maybe. overall i'd say no 3 at best and i'm being very generous. some of these fellas don't even look like they belong in a sporting field.

Of course your team Pakistan is no 6 and cant dream of being number 1 for years ahead.

[Septimius Severus]

lol Boycott is best at trolling. Target audience MAD. GJBM successfull troll is successfull

[Sarkar]

Of course your team Pakistan is no 6 and cant dream of being number 1 for years ahead.

They couldnt even beat west indies c side in recent test series so much for phaast bowlers they havent won a series in windies.

[Desi Cartman]

By beating eng in eng then in India , how else ?

[akshayxyz]

"The question everybody keeps asking is how the hell did India get to number one in the world playing like this?

huh...will they ever grow up? If English have really worked hard to get at top spot - they should be first ones to know how their predecessors must have performed to reach and stay there. This is the kind of snobbish attitude, for which I never wished English to reach at top. I hope this comes back to bite them soon. I do not remember much of early 80s and before, but I guess WI & India have been the most graceful #1 sides.

[Maundy Gregory]

Quite simple Mr Boycott. Thrashed the Aussies by 372 runs and 172 runs Chased down 387 on a 5th day minefield of a pitch against your team Thrashed the Kiwis by 10 wickets Thumped the then no 2 and the future no 1 Sri Lanka by an innings and 144 runs and then again by an innings and 24 runs Now those results don't sound much different to what your team has done or do you think anything that happened before Ashes 2009 doesn't count?

Not for the purposes of the rankings. The most recent results have the highest value, as it should be. Else we'd be factoring in the 1974 series...........