King Tendulkar Posted January 15, 2013 Author Posted January 15, 2013 Jadeja is a better bowler overall and a much better FC bowler. But the difference in terms of what they do in ODI's is marginal. Just look at the stats for the past 2/3 years for each. Yuvi bowled total pies today. Long hop city. Yuvi is handly bowler but can be poor. Thats why with jadeja and yuvi in team you have more options if a bowler has off day. Having yuvi as 5th and only bowler is too risky, plus jadeja is better bowler anyway
Cevno Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 Yuvi bowled total pies today. Long hop city. Yuvi is handly bowler but can be poor. Thats why with jadeja and yuvi in team you have more options if a bowler has off day. Having yuvi as 5th and only bowler is too risky, plus jadeja is better bowler anyway Oh, so let's use sample size of 1 match over 2 + years. :giggle:
King Tendulkar Posted January 15, 2013 Author Posted January 15, 2013 The only problem is, he is doing so well that our idiotic selctors and captain will want him in test team
diga Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 stats in ODIs only : bowling: 62 matches & 63 wkts @ avg of 37 and economy of 4.89... that's like 1 wkt per match.. batting: avg of 27 @ s/r of 78... Isn't the s/r a tad low for a finisher ? may be he should bat in place of Yuvi
Lord Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 That was Australia in non helpful conditions. This is India in turning conditions. Also, he got largely spanked in England too and didn't do much with the bat. Champions trophy is there also. he did well with bat in England
Lord Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 The only problem is' date=' he is doing so well that our idiotic selctors and captain will want him in test team[/quote'] thats better than having Raina or Yuvraj,though Rahane/Rohit should come in but we both know that wont happen:giggle:
youngindia Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 batting: avg of 27 @ s/r of 78... Isn't the s/r a tad low for a finisher ? may be he should bat in place of Yuvi for the umpteenth time, this data reflects his status as an inexperienced,incomplete player. we do not yet know what standards he can reach as a experienced established player. a player's game is dynamic and evolving, not static until there is a saturation point(the peak). to make things clear, he is primarily a batsman whose weaker dept is bowling.(the likes of kapil and shaun pollock avg less than him in a career) i am happy if he can do better than yuvraj or rainaas a 5th bowler.he is not good enough to be a no 4 bowler. for his long term future, he has to grow as matchwinning bat. the no 7 slot is well suited for him.
Lord Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 for the umpteenth time, this data reflects his status as an inexperienced,incomplete player. we do not yet know what standards he can reach as a experienced established player. a player's game is dynamic and evolving, not static until there is a saturation point(the peak). to make things clear, he is primarily a batsman whose weaker dept is bowling. i am happy if he can do better than yuvraj or rainaas a 5th bowler.he is not good enough to be a no 4 bowler. for his long term future, he has to grow as matchwinning bat. the no 7 slot is well suited for him. agree
diga Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 for the umpteenth time, this data reflects his status as an inexperienced,incomplete player. we do not yet know what standards he can reach as a experienced established player. a player's game is dynamic and evolving, not static until there is a saturation point(the peak). to make things clear, he is primarily a batsman whose weaker dept is bowling. i am happy if he can do better than yuvraj or rainaas a 5th bowler.he is not good enough to be a no 4 bowler. for his long term future, he has to grow as matchwinning bat. the no 7 slot is well suited for him. agree ... if he grows onto a complete package, all the more better for India But why does one need to grow at the cost of losing games for India? Do players like Rohit/Jadeja given umpteen chances before they mature? May be the selectors/system are to be blamed here..
CG Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 i still remember how Watson' date=' Warner, Hussey spanked him all over.[/quote'] I would have loved to see this kind of spin against Aus team of gilly,hayden,symo.Batting standards have gone down so much.
King Tendulkar Posted January 15, 2013 Author Posted January 15, 2013 for the umpteenth time, this data reflects his status as an inexperienced,incomplete player. we do not yet know what standards he can reach as a experienced established player. a player's game is dynamic and evolving, not static until there is a saturation point(the peak). to make things clear, he is primarily a batsman whose weaker dept is bowling.(the likes of kapil and shaun pollock avg less than him in a career) i am happy if he can do better than yuvraj or rainaas a 5th bowler.he is not good enough to be a no 4 bowler. for his long term future, he has to grow as matchwinning bat. the no 7 slot is well suited for him. Totally agree there. That goes for all players not just jadeja. If we just went by previous stats. ZK would never have made comeback after county stint Gambhir would never have come back after being axed for a year or so Laxman would never have made 2001 aus series team etc etc Players can go away and improve.
King Tendulkar Posted January 15, 2013 Author Posted January 15, 2013 agree ... if he grows onto a complete package, all the more better for India But why does one need to grow at the cost of losing games for India? Do players like Rohit/Jadeja given umpteen chances before they mature? May be the selectors/system are to be blamed here.. Jadeja has done really well for a number of matches in his comback, what are you going on about. In 2 out of last 3 matches he was basically mom
diga Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 Jadeja has done really well for a number of matches in his comback' date=' what are you going on about. In 2 out of last 3 matches he was basically mom[/quote'] I am not talking about only the last few matches.. but in general to the trend of giving umpteen chances to an youngster -who proves himself in one series & fails in numerous others before becoming a permanent fixture, at the cost of another deserving player In general,these days people are given more time to mature/deliver than the 80s/90s.
King Tendulkar Posted January 15, 2013 Author Posted January 15, 2013 Golden duck next game. Called it! Still may bowl well though
The Outsider Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 Haha! One innings and Jadeja is being compared to Kapil Dev with no consideration to strike rate and the era in which Kapil and Jadeja have played. With this performance he is almost a certain starter in the Champions Trophy later in the year - wahan par sab doodh ka doodh aur paani ka paani ho jaayega.
Lord Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 Haha! One innings and Jadeja is being compared to Kapil Dev with no consideration to strike rate and the era in which Kapil and Jadeja have played. With this performance he is almost a certain starter in the Champions Trophy later in the year - wahan par sab doodh ka doodh aur paani ka paani ho jaayega. where?
The Outsider Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 where? to make things clear, he is primarily a batsman whose weaker dept is bowling.(the likes of kapil and shaun pollock avg less than him in a career)
NareshK Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 Right now, our so called main strike spinner, Ashwin is struggling to land 3 balls in the same spot and cant even trouble the likes of Root, Kieswetter on a track where the ball is turning and stopping and people here are still taking a dig at Jadeja. :hysterical: Our other "spinner" Yuvraj is bowling 2 to 3 half trackers and pies at the moment. With our spin bowling resources the way they are, Jadeja is a godsend.
King Tendulkar Posted January 15, 2013 Author Posted January 15, 2013 Haha! One innings and Jadeja is being compared to Kapil Dev with no consideration to strike rate and the era in which Kapil and Jadeja have played. With this performance he is almost a certain starter in the Champions Trophy later in the year - wahan par sab doodh ka doodh aur paani ka paani ho jaayega. So you dont think he has played well since coming back in to team against Pak? I think champs trophy will be perfect test for jadeja. We will then get to see wether he is worth place in team. Its in our interests to see, as he had been very good since ciming back in odi team, basically being mom in 2 of our last 3 matches
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now