akshayxyz Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 Good for you and the society given your understanding of QM, forget about QFT. Huh..Do you want to compare sizes of dicks though space-time? Where you/I stood 10-15 years back - (compared to peers, in your language), or what you/I have been doing after that? Anyway, I doubt you are going to change your attitude. Are you willing to listen to correct information? Had you started with the right tone/words (constructive feedback/reply - is the keyword) - then definitely yes - even then I tried.
The Outsider Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 Huh..Do you want to compare sizes of dicks though space-time? Where you/I stood 10-15 years back - (compared to peers, in your language), or what you/I have been doing after that? Anyway, I doubt you are going to change your attitude. Had you started with the right tone/words (constructive feedback/reply - is the keyword) - then definitely yes - even then I tried. No, I don't. All I am saying is that your imperfect/rudimentary/flawed understanding of QM/QFT might not make you the best guy to comment with authority on scenarios which require a bit more complexity, according to me. I am sorry for not condescending to your BS - almost every thread which has a modicum of science involved you and Nirvanam are there garbaging it with horse crap, even if you can't draw the five fundamental nodes of a particle in a box according to QM.
akshayxyz Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 No, I don't. All I am saying is that your imperfect/rudimentary/flawed understanding of QM/QFT might not make you the best guy to comment with authority on scenarios which require a bit more complexity, according to me. I am sorry for not condescending to your BS - almost every thread which has a modicum of science involved you and Nirvanam are there garbaging it with horse crap, even if you can't draw the five fundamental nodes of a particle in a box according to QM. As I assumed, your attitude is not going to change. And you do not seem to understand the meaning of "constructive feedback/reply" - according to me, in the current context. One more attempt - Here is one of the many examples of how an expert converses with random-layman-even-on-internet in his area of expertise & worship. You can also find an example of the use of word 'nonsense' in a gentlemanly and (more importantly) constructive way. "Open Space for Questions on OPERA findings - Professor Matt Strassler"
akshayxyz Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 can any one explain why is this important and if its true what difference will it make ? From a layman to (perhaps) a layman - It can shake the very foundations of Theory of General Relativity and Special Relativity - (cumulative work of Albert Einstein and many other geniuses). Theories, which have been experimentally verified over and again ever since they were postulated. Even bigger than other leaps of belief e.g. from "Earth is flat" to "Earth is round".
punjabi_khota Posted September 28, 2011 Author Posted September 28, 2011 Read in a Physics magazine that if the discovery is verified, it still doesn't violate the theory of Relativity. The author claimed that the theory implies that a particle below the speed of light cannot be accelerated to speed higher than light, and a particle above the speed of light cannot be decelerated below the speed of light. :hmmm:
akshayxyz Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 Read in a Physics magazine that if the discovery is verified, it still doesn't violate the theory of Relativity. The author claimed that the theory implies that a particle below the speed of light cannot be accelerated to speed higher than light, and a particle above the speed of light cannot be decelerated below the speed of light. :hmmm: I guess that is what I implied when I said - "I would prefer to think that neutrino those neutrinos waswere already traveling Faster Than Light - from its birth." But won't it still challenge the conventionally known/assumed mass of neutrinos? Also, as I understand - there may be unanswered questions about how FTL neutrinos 'interact' and hence get detected especially by equipment which is not designed to detect Tachyonic particles.
The Outsider Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 As I assumed' date= your attitude is not going to change. And you do not seem to understand the meaning of "constructive feedback/reply" - according to me, in the current context. One more attempt - Here is one of the many examples of how an expert converses with random-layman-even-on-internet in his area of expertise & worship. You can also find an example of the use of word 'nonsense' in a gentlemanly and (more importantly) constructive way. "Open Space for Questions on OPERA findings - Professor Matt Strassler" Not really, as long as you keep spouting gibberish like light can travel faster than light. Have a conversation with Matt and he will tell you the same thing in all likelihood (I was a graduate student at Penn when he was a faculty there). Quote the rubbish you've written in this thread and ask him to pass a scientific judgment on it - he is a much more patient guy than I am, so let's see what you get in response. EDIT : Reading your previous post, here is an advice - get off reddit if you really want to learn something about something.
akshayxyz Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 ^ In your language - :facepalm: You just don't seem to get the point (or I could not put it across clearly enough). Anyway, everyone have their own limitations.
Raghav_12 Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 Not really, as long as you keep spouting gibberish like light can travel faster than light. Have a conversation with Matt and he will tell you the same thing in all likelihood (I was a graduate student at Penn when he was a faculty there). Quote the rubbish you've written in this thread and ask him to pass a scientific judgment on it - he is a much more patient guy than I am, so let's see what you get in response. EDIT : Reading your previous post, here is an advice - get off reddit if you really want to learn something about something. I don't think this is a forum for some scientific society. People here going to talk about science in layman terms only and that is better also for a vast majority of audience here, who won't understand many technical terms. Just because you know more than others in a particular field, because of your formal education, doesn't give you a right to be talking in condescending tone to people who knows less. If you expect that kind of competence on subject from participants you better go to forum of some scientists (or PhD's atleast). Indian Cricket Fans forum is not a place for that.
The Outsider Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 I don't think this is a forum for some scientific society. People here going to talk about science in layman terms only and that is better also for a vast majority of audience here' date=' who won't understand many technical terms. Just because you know more than others in a particular field, because of your formal education, give you a right to be talking in condescending tone to people who knows less. If you expect that kind of competence on subject from participants you better go to forum of some scientists (or PhD's atleast). Indian Cricket Fans forum is not a place for that.[/quote'] My issue is not about this being a cricket site and people being experts in any subject. The issue is knowing jack ***** about something and coming across as an authority on it. Hope you see the difference.
akshayxyz Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 Not really, as long as you keep spouting gibberish like light can travel faster than light. Have a conversation with Matt and he will tell you the same thing in all likelihood (I was a graduate student at Penn when he was a faculty there). Quote the rubbish you've written in this thread and ask him to pass a scientific judgment on it - he is a much more patient guy than I am, so let's see what you get in response. EDIT : Reading your previous post, here is an advice - get off reddit if you really want to learn something about something. Thank you very much. PS. I have known how to excel (as compared to peers) in my areas of interest - ranging from something to some totally other thing. And I know exactly where I stand in whatever I choose do.
yoda Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 I don't think this is a forum for some scientific society. People here going to talk about science in layman terms only and that is better also for a vast majority of audience here' date=' who won't understand many technical terms. Just because you know more than others in a particular field, because of your formal education, give you a right to be talking in condescending tone to people who knows less. If you expect that kind of competence on subject from participants you better go to forum of some scientists (or PhD's atleast). Indian Cricket Fans forum is not a place for that.[/quote'] Good post.
nballa Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 there is one way where information travels more than the speed of light. can anyone guess?
akshayxyz Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 My issue is not about this being a cricket site and people being experts in any subject. The issue is knowing jack ***** about something and coming across as an authority on it. Hope you see the difference. In your language, according to me, you do not seem to know jack **** about how to spot the difference between someone who is pretending to be authoritative and some excited/entusiastic layman. EDIT: ________________________ And how to respond to one such.^
akshayxyz Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 I guess that is what I implied when I said - "I would prefer to think that neutrino those neutrinos waswere already traveling Faster Than Light - from its birth." But won't it still challenge the conventionally known/assumed mass of neutrinos? Also, as I understand - there may be unanswered questions about how FTL neutrinos 'interact' and hence get detected especially by equipment which is not designed to detect Tachyonic particles. Not really, as long as you keep spouting gibberish like light can travel faster than light. Have a conversation with Matt and he will tell you the same thing in all likelihood (I was a graduate student at Penn when he was a faculty there). Quote the rubbish you've written in this thread and ask him to pass a scientific judgment on it - he is a much more patient guy than I am, so let's see what you get in response. EDIT : Reading your previous post, here is an advice - get off reddit if you really want to learn something about something. btw, that was quite an informative addendum in response to authoritative question asked in what you might have been referring to as "previous post". there is one way where information travels more than the speed of light. can anyone guess? Complete the story :hitler:
asterix Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 What about places where Sunlight doesn't reaches? :hmmm:
Yoda-esque Posted September 28, 2011 Posted September 28, 2011 What about places where Sunlight doesn't reaches? :hmmm: We have Ram Gopal Varma for that
ganeshran Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 What about places where Sunlight doesn't reaches? :hmmm: I didnt understand your post. :hmmmm:
akshayxyz Posted September 29, 2011 Posted September 29, 2011 akshay ' date=' Outy is not here to indulge in a mature discussion with others ... I thought you would have realized this by now. stop wasting your time.[/quote'] or may be a case of - "empty vessels make more noise", just saying.
mishra Posted September 30, 2011 Posted September 30, 2011 I thought superman was faster than light......
Recommended Posts