kabira Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 The data is wrong, they show current population of ahmedabad round 58 lakhs, but its 72 lakhs as per 2011 census.
Mariyam Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 In the entire history of the world, as far back as the first homo sapiens, 79,844,377,069 people were born before you. Is that good, bad or ugly? On the day you were born, 4,962,686,258 people born before you were alive. So whats the fun in this site? It just throws out a random number. I think I figured out how it works. It takes your date and place of birth from you and then the computer asks a monkey to randomly punch some keys on the number pad and gives it off as the output. :hmmm:
Yoda-esque Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 In the entire history of the world, as far back as the first homo sapiens, 79,844,377,069 people were born before you. Is that good, bad or ugly? On the day you were born, 4,962,686,258 people born before you were alive. So whats the fun in this site? It just throws out a random number. I think I figured out how it works. It takes your date and place of birth from you and then the computer asks a monkey to randomly punch some keys on the number pad and gives it off as the output. :hmmm: You were born in 1987 (Jan or Feb)
Trichromatic Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 So whats the fun in this site? It just throws out a random number. I think I figured out how it works. It takes your date and place of birth from you and then the computer asks a monkey to randomly punch some keys on the number pad and gives it off as the output. :hmmm: :cantstop: Both numbers have been calculated using UN Population Division figures. The second is an estimate of how many people were alive on your date of birth. It is one possible value based on global population figures and estimates of growth rates over time. Data before 1950 is less accurate than figures after that date. The first number includes calculations based on the methodology of scholar Carl Haub, who estimated how many people had been alive since 50,000 B.C. His calculation has been amended by the UN to include additional points in time. How many people have ever lived on earth - by Carl Haub http://www.prb.org/Articles/2002/HowManyPeopleHaveEverLivedonEarth.aspx [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WTctr5kviA]How Many People Have Ever Lived on Earth? - YouTube[/ame]
Sidhoni Posted November 2, 2011 Author Posted November 2, 2011 It means you are 18-19 years old Ya, I'm 19 Great site Sidhoni..Population has increased by about a billion every 11-13 years since the 60s. Population by 2050 is expected to be more than 10 billion!!!! :icflove::icflove::icflove:
Mariyam Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 THIS SITE IS A SCAM I'll tell you what I've just discovered. Look at post 1 80,583,511,282 were born b4 Sidhoni 5,435,730,546-Population of the World when he was born. Subtracting the two gives: 75147780736 Now look at my post. 79,844,377,069 people were born before me On the day you were born, 4,962,686,258 population of the world. Subtracting the two gives: 74881690811 How can the two numbers (from subtractions) be different? People are either alive or dead. There is no third possibility like people being abducted by aliens or splitting into two people. Is this a revolutionary Malthusian discovery or a math fail on my part?
Yoda-esque Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 THIS SITE IS A SCAM I'll tell you what I've just discovered. Look at post 1 80,583,511,282 were born b4 Sidhoni 5,435,730,546-Population of the World when he was born. Subtracting the two gives: 75147780736 Now look at my post. 79,844,377,069 people were born before me On the day you were born, 4,962,686,258 population of the world. Subtracting the two gives: 74881690811 How can the two numbers (from subtractions) be different? People are either alive or dead. There is no third possibility like people being abducted by aliens or splitting into two people. Is this a revolutionary Malthusian discovery or a math fail on my part? Math fail on your part.The difference between the two numbers in bold is the Increase in population .
The Outsider Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Is this a revolutionary Malthusian discovery or a math fail on my part? :acute: The bold numbers in your post are the number of people who have died till that time. Since sidhoni was born after you, obviously more people would have died by the time he was born, and the difference between the two numbers is the number of people who died between the time you and sidhoni were born.
Yoda-esque Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 :acute: The bold numbers in your post are the number of people who have died till that time. Since sidhoni was born after you, obviously more people would have died by the time he was born, and the difference between the two numbers is the number of people who died between the time you and sidhoni were born. Actually I think its the number of additional people born (decreased mortality rates), not the deceased.
Mariyam Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Math fail on your part.The difference between the two numbers in bold is the deceased population . :acute: The bold numbers in your post are the number of people who have died till that time. Since sidhoni was born after you, obviously more people would have died by the time he was born, and the difference between the two numbers is the number of people who died between the time you and sidhoni were born. Yes you guys are right. The difference is the deceased people. I don't know what exactly I was thinking at that instance, but I was totally convinced by it then. No Nobel here. I will have to head to some other thread and do my 'research' there for my well deserved Nobel.
DomainK Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Totally not interested in how many people are alive at the time I was born. I would be more interested in something like how many single girls and in and around Mumbai right now, along with their telephone numbers if possible.
The Outsider Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Actually I think its the number of additional people born (decreased mortality rates)' date=' not the deceased.[/quote'] Maybe I haven't woken up yet. The way I am thinking : 80,583,511,282 - Total number of people born before Sidhoni 5,435,730,546 - Total number of alive people in the world when Sidhoni was born. Won't the difference, 75147780736, be the total number of people who were born before Sidhoni but were not alive when Sidhoni was born ie. dead? Similarly, 74881690811, would be the total number of dead when Mariyam was born? And the difference between the two the increase in number of dead between Sidhoni and Mariyam's birth?
Yoda-esque Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Maybe I haven't woken up yet. The way I am thinking : 80,583,511,282 - Total number of people born before Sidhoni 5,435,730,546 - Total number of alive people in the world when Sidhoni was born. Won't the difference, 75147780736, be the total number of people who were born before Sidhoni but were not alive when Sidhoni was born ie. dead? No, The difference between Sid's number in bold and Mariyam's number in bold is in the "+" which means that more people were born during that period.Hence the difference is the net increase in population which makes sense, else the world would show a negative population growth. I kinda got confused initially since I thought Sid was older than Mariyam
The Outsider Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Totally not interested in how many people are alive at the time I was born. I would be more interested in something like how many single girls and in and around Mumbai right now' date= along with their telephone numbers if possible. At least till last month your visit to this thread could be categorized as a good effort to achieve your goal.
Mariyam Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Totally not interested in how many people are alive at the time I was born. I would be more interested in something like how many single girls and in and around Mumbai right now' date=' along with their telephone numbers if possible.[/quote'] There already is a well established service for that. Just call up 100 from your cell phone, leave your name and address and tell the operator that you are on the prowl for single girls ( and their cell numbers) in and around Mumbai. They'll promptly get back to you.
The Outsider Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 No, The difference between Sid's number in bold and Mariyam's number in bold is in the "+" which means that more people were born during that period.Hence the difference is the net increase in population which makes sense, else the world would show a negative population growth. I kinda got confused initially since I thought Sid was older than Mariyam The difference in population when Sidhoni and Mariyam were born is 473,044,288. The difference between the two bold numbers is 266,089,925.
DomainK Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 At least till last month your visit to this thread could be categorized as a good effort to achieve your goal. Naughty ::acute: There already is a well established service for that. Just call up 100 from your cell phone, leave your name and address and tell the operator that you are on the prowl for single girls ( and their cell numbers) in and around Mumbai. They'll promptly get back to you. That is some valuable legal advice there. But no thanks. :headshake:
Yoda-esque Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 The difference in population when Sidhoni and Mariyam were born is 473,044,288. The difference between the two bold numbers is 266,089,925. Outy - You are right. The difference between the bold numbers is the deceased population.
ganeshran Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Totally not interested in how many people are alive at the time I was born. I would be more interested in something like how many single girls and in and around Mumbai right now' date=' along with their telephone numbers if possible.[/quote'] this. :hatsoff:
Raghav_12 Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Is this a revolutionary Malthusian discovery or a math fail on my part? Your math fail is notwithstanding, this whole site is scam/fraud. And I am surprised so many supposedly educated people have fallen for it. How the hell somebody can tell how many homosapiens were born on earth before me. Hell, we can't even say, exactly how many years ago first mankind was born on earth, forget about how many. I had never thought that this thread would have so many responses :hysterical:
Recommended Posts