Trichromatic Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 OP did you get your answer? :hmmm: He will return back next year. :winky:
akshayxyz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 ^Before that I am waiting for the another type of batch - SRT is not a finisher :winky:.
Trichromatic Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 ^Before that I am waiting for the another type of batch - SRT is not a finisher :winky:. Finisher? It was another useless inning played with no pressure. Sehwag scored quickly to ease off the pressure and it was Laxman who finished the game. Sachin never wins a game on his own. :headshake: He was playing for his record and you could see that in his game. :cantstop:
akshayxyz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 TBH - I was praying that SRT stays not out in 90s, - killing two birds with one arrow - non-finisher, selfish act.
CSK Fan Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 TBH - I was praying that SRT stays not out in 90s' date=' - killing two birds with one arrow - non-finisher, selfish act.[/quote'] And that would have helped how? The vultures would have waited till the next time he failed and pointed fingers again
Trichromatic Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 TBH - I was praying that SRT stays not out in 90s' date=' - killing two birds with one arrow - non-finisher, selfish act.[/quote'] I'm annoyed with commentators talking as if he failed in this match. They are constantly mentioning how unfortunately he missed his 100th 100. Come on, it was a very good inning that too in 4th inning in tough situation. Stop reacting in same way as we do to other players when they get out in 20s. Oh he got start but couldn't convert it. :facepalm:
CSK Fan Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 I think about 20 odd. Would love to be proved wrong though. Funny thing with SRT fanatics (or S=G types if you will) is whenever they are asked for a predication, they either dodge the question or attack the poster. Why so little faith in the revered one? There is a reason why trolls like these succeed with such posts. If I choose any batsman in the world, what is the probabilty that he will make a good score in any one chosen match? Very low obviously. Even a batsman like Sachin or dravid make a good score once ever 4-5 matches, that too in one innings. So the probabilty of them scoring in one chosen innings is less than 10%. So, apart from few exceptions (like this match), the odds are on the troll's side as a batsman is much more likely to fail in one chosen innings than succeed. So the odds are 9 to 1 for the trolls. I am glad this is one of the few times it failed and we can laugh at him
akshayxyz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 @vibhash ^ 76 = good start :)...may he get many more such 'failed' starts. :D
Mariyam Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 There is a reason why trolls like these succeed with such posts. If I choose any batsman in the world' date=' what is the probabilty that he will make a good score in any one chosen match? Very low obviously. Even a batsman like Sachin or dravid make a good score once ever 4-5 matches. So the probabilty of them scoring in one chosen innings is less than 10. So, apart from few exceptions (like this match), the odds are on the trolls side as a batsman is much more likely to fail in one chosen innings than succeed[/quote'] Yes. This makes sense a lot of sense. Never thought of it that way. :two_thumbs_up: With your permission, may I use the above in my next great literary masterpiece ( scheduled Christmas release): "trolling for dummies"? :P
Sachin=GOD Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Yes. This makes sense a lot of sense. Never thought of it that way. :two_thumbs_up: With your permission, may I use the above in my next great literary masterpiece ( scheduled Christmas release): "trolling for dummies"? :P take some tips from SirJaun :nice:
CSK Fan Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Yes. This makes sense a lot of sense. Never thought of it that way. :two_thumbs_up: With your permission, may I use the above in my next great literary masterpiece ( scheduled Christmas release): "trolling for dummies"? :P I am sure there are things you can teach me about trolling which I cannot think of in a million years :haha:
akshayxyz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 There is a reason why trolls like these succeed with such posts. If I choose any batsman in the world' date=' what is the probabilty that he will make a good score in any one chosen match? Very low obviously. Even a batsman like Sachin or dravid make a good score once ever 4-5 matches, that too in one innings. So the probabilty of them scoring in [b']one chosen innings is less than 10%. So, apart from few exceptions (like this match), the odds are on the troll's side as a batsman is much more likely to fail in one chosen innings than succeed. So the odds are 9 to 1 for the trolls. I am glad this is one of the few times it failed and we can laugh at him no. It is much more than that. If you consider any 50+ score as good score. out of 298 innings SRT has 112 50+ innings - that is about 37.5%, or roughly once out of 2.66 innings. But it still is significantly less than 50%, the break even point for haters vs others.
akshayxyz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 And of the contemporaries, Kallis is marginally better ( 38%)..Ponting marginally lower (36%), and Sangakara almost equal (37.5%).. and of all the people only DGB is an isolated freak.. 52% times crossing 50+!!
CSK Fan Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 no. It is much more than that. If you consider any 50+ score as good score. out of 298 innings SRT has 112 50+ innings - that is about 37.5%, or roughly once out of 2.66 innings. But it still is significantly less than 50%, the break even point for haters vs others. Well any score less tha 100 is a failure for Sachin, dont you know
akshayxyz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Well any score less tha 100 is a failure for Sachin' date= dont you know ftfy.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now