Jump to content

Calling all SRT=God types


vicks

Recommended Posts

Posted
^Before that I am waiting for the another type of batch - SRT is not a finisher :winky:.
Finisher? It was another useless inning played with no pressure. Sehwag scored quickly to ease off the pressure and it was Laxman who finished the game. Sachin never wins a game on his own. :headshake: He was playing for his record and you could see that in his game. :cantstop:
Posted
TBH - I was praying that SRT stays not out in 90s' date=' - killing two birds with one arrow - non-finisher, selfish act.[/quote'] And that would have helped how? The vultures would have waited till the next time he failed and pointed fingers again
Posted
TBH - I was praying that SRT stays not out in 90s' date=' - killing two birds with one arrow - non-finisher, selfish act.[/quote'] I'm annoyed with commentators talking as if he failed in this match. They are constantly mentioning how unfortunately he missed his 100th 100. Come on, it was a very good inning that too in 4th inning in tough situation. Stop reacting in same way as we do to other players when they get out in 20s. Oh he got start but couldn't convert it. :facepalm:
Posted
I think about 20 odd. Would love to be proved wrong though. Funny thing with SRT fanatics (or S=G types if you will) is whenever they are asked for a predication, they either dodge the question or attack the poster. Why so little faith in the revered one?
There is a reason why trolls like these succeed with such posts. If I choose any batsman in the world, what is the probabilty that he will make a good score in any one chosen match? Very low obviously. Even a batsman like Sachin or dravid make a good score once ever 4-5 matches, that too in one innings. So the probabilty of them scoring in one chosen innings is less than 10%. So, apart from few exceptions (like this match), the odds are on the troll's side as a batsman is much more likely to fail in one chosen innings than succeed. So the odds are 9 to 1 for the trolls. I am glad this is one of the few times it failed and we can laugh at him
Posted
There is a reason why trolls like these succeed with such posts. If I choose any batsman in the world' date=' what is the probabilty that he will make a good score in any one chosen match? Very low obviously. Even a batsman like Sachin or dravid make a good score once ever 4-5 matches. So the probabilty of them scoring in one chosen innings is less than 10. So, apart from few exceptions (like this match), the odds are on the trolls side as a batsman is much more likely to fail in one chosen innings than succeed[/quote'] Yes. This makes sense a lot of sense. Never thought of it that way. :two_thumbs_up: With your permission, may I use the above in my next great literary masterpiece ( scheduled Christmas release): "trolling for dummies"? :P
Posted
Yes. This makes sense a lot of sense. Never thought of it that way. :two_thumbs_up: With your permission, may I use the above in my next great literary masterpiece ( scheduled Christmas release): "trolling for dummies"? :P
take some tips from SirJaun :nice:
Posted
Yes. This makes sense a lot of sense. Never thought of it that way. :two_thumbs_up: With your permission, may I use the above in my next great literary masterpiece ( scheduled Christmas release): "trolling for dummies"? :P
I am sure there are things you can teach me about trolling which I cannot think of in a million years :haha:
Posted
There is a reason why trolls like these succeed with such posts. If I choose any batsman in the world' date=' what is the probabilty that he will make a good score in any one chosen match? Very low obviously. Even a batsman like Sachin or dravid make a good score once ever 4-5 matches, that too in one innings. So the probabilty of them scoring in [b']one chosen innings is less than 10%. So, apart from few exceptions (like this match), the odds are on the troll's side as a batsman is much more likely to fail in one chosen innings than succeed. So the odds are 9 to 1 for the trolls. I am glad this is one of the few times it failed and we can laugh at him
no. It is much more than that. If you consider any 50+ score as good score. out of 298 innings SRT has 112 50+ innings - that is about 37.5%, or roughly once out of 2.66 innings. But it still is significantly less than 50%, the break even point for haters vs others.
Posted

And of the contemporaries, Kallis is marginally better ( 38%)..Ponting marginally lower (36%), and Sangakara almost equal (37.5%).. and of all the people only DGB is an isolated freak.. 52% times crossing 50+!!

Posted
no. It is much more than that. If you consider any 50+ score as good score. out of 298 innings SRT has 112 50+ innings - that is about 37.5%, or roughly once out of 2.66 innings. But it still is significantly less than 50%, the break even point for haters vs others.
Well any score less tha 100 is a failure for Sachin, dont you know

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...