Jump to content

Impressed by Aaron


Recommended Posts

Dont keep your hopes up' date=' they are all bad. I mean Ishanth is bad, but WTF happened to Shami and BK today?! We just have an appalling bowling unit.[/quote'] Shami took 3 wickets. BK had only ONE bad over in the 7 he bowled and he went for only 13 in that. Even the best death bowlers have one off over. On the other hand, you know how Ishant has been bowling constantly
Link to comment
Shami took 3 wickets. BK had only ONE bad over in the 7 he bowled and he went for only 13 in that. Even the best death bowlers have one off over. On the other hand' date=' you know how Ishant has been bowling constantly[/quote'] Ishant always looks non threatnig and awful and his stats always back that up as well. How can he keep making squads lets alone team!!!
Link to comment
Compare Yadav's stats with any other bowler's and you'll find out for yourself. His pace doesn't make any more dangerous. In fact' date=' batsmen find it easier to score off him. Very poor economy and strike rate that would only be fitting for a part-time bowler.[/quote'] If he had been backed, used and groomed like Ishant. Playing every game day in day out, you would have seen results and improvement. As for ishant......
Link to comment
If he had been backed' date=' used and groomed like Ishant. Playing every game day in day out, you would have seen results and improvement. As for ishant......[/quote'] Thing is if he was a good bowler he would perform in domestic cricket, but he's just as poor at the domestic level as he is in internationals. He's India's version of Jade Dernbach, whose abilities as a bowler are overhyped simply because Indians get a hard-on for anyone who can bowl quick.
Link to comment
Compare Yadav's stats with any other bowler's and you'll find out for yourself. His pace doesn't make any more dangerous. In fact' date=' batsmen find it easier to score off him. Very poor economy and strike rate that would only be fitting for a part-time bowler.[/quote'] When Yadav and BK were bowling in tandem, india was winning. Thats all u need to know. Scores were rarely over 250 as well. They take wickets and that is what wins. look at corey anderson, NZ persist and he gets them wickets even if at a high economy rate. If he did not, they wouldnt use him!
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...