Rohit Sharma and Bravo

[Manu80]

Rohit Sharma and Darren Bravo are the two best young batting talents in world cricket.Virat Kohli is also a wonderful player but class wise these two are the best.so easy on the eyes

[Sachin=GOD]

Okay.

[Old guy]

i like batsmen like amla more..by far the best talent and a future great in making

[Ultimate_Game]

Rohit unlucky to be born in India. Any other country and he would be an established player by now.

[rkt.india]

Rohit is certainly better in terms of the class and shots he has, but he still has to prove himself temperamentally if he can play long innings, score 100s even in ODIs.

[vamos_rafa]

Okay.

You don't agree to the OP?

[Stuge]

bravo is class apart when it comes tests and rohit is yet to play a single test .

[CasualVisitor]

Rohit is certainly better in terms of the class and shots he has' date=' but he still has to prove himself temperamentally if he can play long innings, score 100s even in ODIs.[/quote'] This. Also constant flip-flop in his case doesn't help either. Think he should be given a longer rope.

[Sachin=GOD]

You don't agree to the OP?

I agree. But the way he made his point was kind of weird - he didn't ask any question, just stated his opinion to start a thread. On topic, Roht and Bravo are both extremely talented but Bravo has already been given chances at the Test level and has also performed while Rohit has not made the most of the ODIs he has got. Rohit will soon get chances in Tests and if he fails to make an impression in the first few Tests then despite his huge talent he may end as one of those who never lived upto their potential.

[Manu80]

Yes lot of pressure on the poor fellow.he must take full advantage of the chances he will get to prove himself in test matches.guys like Rahane,Pujara,kohli,Pandey,Tiwari are all there to prove their mettle.it is tough being a middle order batsman to get sneak into our national team.

[rkt.india]

I agree. But the way he made his point was kind of weird - he didn't ask any question, just stated his opinion to start a thread. On topic, Roht and Bravo are both extremely talented but Bravo has already been given chances at the Test level and has also performed while Rohit has not made the most of the ODIs he has got. Rohit will soon get chances in Tests and if he fails to make an impression in the first few Tests then despite his huge talent he may end as one of those who never lived upto their potential.

Even Bravo's performance in ODI is nothing to talk about.

[Sachin=GOD]

^I was talking about his performance in Tests.

[Texan]

Rohit certainly looks a more talented batsman than Kohli by far. It remains to be seen if he can be level-headed and deliver the consistency that is expected at this level. I would pick both Sharma and Rahane ahead of Kohli in the test match team. Bravo looks like Lara processed through the copier. Even the commentators sometimes stumble and call him Lara.

[Crookbond]

Bump :D

[Texan]

Good timing for Rohit :D Not so good timing for Bravo :sad_smile:

[Muloghonto]

Anyone ever remember seeing Carl Hooper bat ? Rohit is a Hooper with a bit more flourish. But like Hooper, he has oodles and oodles of talent ( Hooper on song out-batted Lara on song, so pleasing was Hooper to the eye) but also like Hooper, he has temperament issues.