rkt.india Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Fast bowling culture' date=' physique level , stamina in everything Australia are way infront of India. They probably already have 20 Aarons.[/quote'] and we ignore the few we have, that is the problem. Aravind who did decently well in IPL was selected for team India. Similarly, Nechim did remarkably well in CLT20 and looked best Indian fast bowler of all is not even discussed. Ironic!!
Magneto Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Then why have selectors and give them 40K per year. Even board president can select a team on his own based on stats. 40K, are you joking? 40L it is :whack:
rkt.india Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 :facepalm: Read post no. 161 before making any further comment :whack: :two_thumbs_up:
rkt.india Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 40K' date=' are you joking? 40L it is :whack:[/quote'] yaaah sorry 40L:winky:
skindia Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Pandey is injured. Uthappa has to prove himself in T20s first. And why exactly would Srikant be partial to Uthappa? :hmmm: how many chance they got in last 3 years...??according to srikkanth uthappa and irfan not among top 36 contracted player list then why he selected him for just 1 t20 and irfan for just 2 odi?? They were not in 30 probable list of world cup t20 and 2011, are they that bad?? is it not politics??
youngindia Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 VK if he continues bowling the same way he has done in last 2 ODI series,can do well in Aus too.He has shown his uselessness in death overs in ODI cricket where he has nowhere to hide but otherwise in last 2 series he has been impressive with his outswing. Before discarding him in test cricket lets see what he can do in the format and I m pretty sure he will bowl with better control than Dravid_TheWall. There is nothing to see. he shud not be anywhere near any inetrnational t20 side.leave alone tests. the quality of someone's game is always visible and there is nothing international class about vinay's bowling...that's not the case with Pk /irfan/unadkat...comparing Pk or irfan to vinay is nonsense. vk is a waste of time and space.i wonder which einstein thinks this trundler can have a inetrnational career. mindboggling incompetence.
skindia Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 if vinay kumar deserves chance based on ranji form...where is badrinath and joginder sharma??
Old guy Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 pattinson talking abt lengths wht i said in one of my posts [ame= ]DEC 9: James Pattinson press conference - YouTube[/ame]
rkt.india Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Parvinder Awana is also bowling really well this season. Another bowler who can touch 140s. Higehst wicket taker this season. 5 matches 26 wickets, 5/52, 8/144, 24.11 average strike rate 45.0
skindia Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Abu nechim not good enough to be in challenger trophy sqaud??
Lord Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Parvinder Awana is also bowling really well this season. Another bowler who can touch 140s. 5 matches 26 wickets, 5/52, 8/144, 24.11 average strike rate 45.0 are u sure?I watched him in a game v TN n he wasnt even touching 130:hmmm:
Number Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 if vinay kumar deserves chance based on ranji form...where is badrinath and joginder sharma?? Badrinath is a failure. Joginder Sharma was severely injured in an accident recently.
youngindia Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Pandey is injured. Uthappa has to prove himself in T20s first. And why exactly would Srikant be partial to Uthappa? :hmmm: uthappa is an excpetional striker of the game who can win games. yes you have to be 'partial' to matchwinners, even if its potential. that's what gives eventual pay off. the best selections always comes when one relies on identifying people who can win matches,
gaurav92 Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 RKT plz don't hype bowlers here Aise hi hum fast bowler ke liye taras rahe hain, aur agar aap 140 140 keh keh ke hype karenge aur ant mein jab woh tezz daudte hue 125 ki speed se ball phekega tab humein bahut thes pahunchegi :((
Sid Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 There is nothing to see. he shud not be anywhere near any inetrnational t20 side.leave alone tests. the quality of someone's game is always visible and there is nothing international class about vinay's bowling...that's not the case with Pk /irfan/unadkat...comparing Pk or irfan to vinay is nonsense. vk is a waste of time and space.i wonder which einstein thinks this trundler can have a inetrnational career. mindboggling incompetence. Though I am not a VK fan in limited overs cricket but still he bowls well upstart but always gets destroyed in death overs.Point is if that no swing,no seam ,no pace expert Mithun can play 4 test matches for India,then VK seems a much better bowler than that joker.
skindia Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 badrinath got just 2 chance in tests...is it reward of 7-8 years hardwork and flop murali vijay getting many chances based on 1 ranji season??mukund is far better than vijay and mukund is ignored..
skindia Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 When leg spinner is necessary in australia...rahul sharma ignored....they should check record of kumble and chandana in australia....
rkt.india Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 are u sure?I watched him in a game v TN n he wasnt even touching 130:hmmm: Yes. He can and most bowlers do not always bowl at their fastest in Ranji. He touched 140s in a match which I watched.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now