Sachin and Bradman comparison : Oz & Indian press

[8ankitj]

LOL. Fully expected vitriol and name calling. And you wonder why I don't bother. How about Tendulkar's domestic average not standing up to Bradman's test average?

[surajmal]

LOL. Fully expected vitriol and name calling. And you wonder why I don't bother. How about Tendulkar's domestic average not standing up to Bradman's test average?

why clutch at straws? Seriously.

[8ankitj]

[surajmal]

sachin's non international first class match average is 65.1 and a major chunk of these matches came early in his career when he was a babe. Rest were just practice matches for him to get rid of the rust between major tours or when he was coming back from injuries. I swear these bradman ball lickers will go to any degree.

[carnish]

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :haha::haha::haha:

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[8ankitj]

You dish out vitriol you will get back your own meds. I was speaking to you very decently till you started your peurile and condescending BS . If you cant handle the heat then dont dish it out .

Stay in limits of decency. I did not mention your ass, why did you mention mine? :hehe:

Do you really think you will let facts get in your way ? Why bother ? Why not simply continue to live in your fantasy land ?

Stop abusing the the word "fact", will you? "Facts" are Bradman's average, his rate of scoring hundreds, his number of double hundreds, averaging above 55 in every single series, scoring a hundred in every single series etc etc. What you have is opinions. And I already said I have nothing new to say. You have got all your answers in my earlier post. Bookmark it if you like. Neither of us are going to change other's opinion. Nor can you get me to respect the opinion that Tednulkar is the greatest thing to step on cricket field, when there are allrounders that have performed at or near the level of Tendulkar's batting in their primary skill. Anyway, once again...

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[pensionplan]

Stay in limits of decency. I did not mention your ass, why did you mention mine? :hehe:

Because BossBhai has a habit of getting kicked on his favorite anatomy on a regular basis and hence cannot get it out of his mind. Please do not take that seriously.

[pensionplan]

And I already said I have nothing new to say. You have got all your answers in my earlier post. Bookmark it if you like. Neither of us are going to change other's opinion. Nor can you get me to respect the opinion that Tednulkar is the greatest thing to step on cricket field' date=' [b']when there are allrounders that have performed at or near the level of Tendulkar's batting in their primary skill.

Counting Sobers one, Kallis two. Did I miss someone.

[zen]

Because BossBhai has a habit of getting kicked on his favorite anatomy on a regular basis and hence cannot get it out of his mind. Please do not take that seriously.

:hysterical:

[zen]

Counting Sobers one' date=' Kallis two. Did I miss someone.[/quote'] Sangakara, if you consider a wk batsman as an all rounder

[Malcolm Merlyn]

Good work Ankit. While stats can do a lot of things,you cant discount that Tendulkar played againist a varied and better attack than Bradman.Use of third umpires. The often repeated argument that Bradman was the best among his peers,we have very well seen that the no. of peers of SRT are many times more than that of Bradman by a huge no. Tendulkar played in a much more varied condition.For eg. since jan 2011 to dec 2011 Tendulkar will have played test matches in IND SA ENG and AUS within 12 months.Dravid in fact would have played in IND SA ENG WI AND AUS.So the amount of adjustment etc is far more than that what Bradman ever faced. Havent seen anyone answer this

[Deleted_User_1]

Let me break it to you' date=' I do statistics and data analysis for a living.[/quote'] Maybe you are sh*t at what you do!! :finger:

[Vijay.Sharma]

when in the opposition, you have McGrath-Warne, Wasim-Waqar and Donald-Pollock combination:

	M	I	No	R	Avg
sWaugh	14	21	1	971	48.55
mWaugh	12	18	0	770	42.78
BCLara	30	57	2	2342	42.58
Sachin	16	31	0	1257	40.55
Anwar	10	19	0	765	40.26

:winky:

Are these the runs these guys scored against McGrath-Warne, Wasim-Waqar, Donald-Pollock?

[BeautifulGame]

Sangakara' date=' if you consider a wk batsman as an all rounder[/quote'] Sankakara averages 37 as a keeper.Nowhere near good enough for an all rounder.Only Gilly and Andy flower deserves to be mentioned as all rounder if wk are considered in same category

[pensionplan]

Sankakara averages 37 as a keeper.Nowhere near good enough for an all rounder.Only Gilly and Andy flower deserves to be mentioned as all rounder if wk are considered in same category

Yeah Gilly with almost 48 average with the bat and more than 400 dismissals as WK is worthy of a mention that can walk in as a batsman or as a WK into a team.

[akshayxyz]

sometime back, I pulled out this stat on one of my rare tour to statsguru.. SRT vs DGB in lost matches.. Hence proved, however great these are, they failed to perform under pressure.

[Old guy]

sometime back, I pulled out this stat on one of my rare tour to statsguru.. SRT vs DGB in lost matches.. Hence proved, however great these are, they failed to perform under pressure.

or both of them are match winners cos if they perform they win and when they not team loses

[bulbul]

sometime back, I pulled out this stat on one of my rare tour to statsguru.. SRT vs DGB in lost matches.. Hence proved, however great these are, they failed to perform under pressure.

How bradman's team lose...oppositioon is always bad isnt it :winky: