Jump to content

Ahahahaahaaahaahaaaa...India beat Pakis again!!!


Guest BossBhai

Recommended Posts

Posted

What a weird poll! If the Black Bradman and Graeme Pollock were there, where the heck was Hobbs' bosom buddy and opening partner, Herbert Sutcliffe who averaged over 60 in a 50+ Test career?

Posted
No one voted for the 'Black Bradman' :((
If Neville Cardus' word means something Bradman must be considered the 'White Headley' If Nasser Hussain, Viv Richards, Brian Lara's words must mean something then Bradman must be considered the "White Sachin Tendulkar"
Posted
What a weird poll! If the Black Bradman and Graeme Pollock were there' date=' where the heck was Hobbs' bosom buddy and opening partner, Herbert Sutcliffe who averaged over 60 in a 50+ Test career?[/quote']I think Sutcliffe had a tremendous average and was definitely one of England's great bats. But for good reason the cricket pundits of his day always felt he wasn't greater than his partner-in-crime Hobbs and later Hammond I think he wouldn't even be among England's top 5 batsmen...surely in the top 10. Per me England's best batsmen were Hutton, Barrington, Hobbs, Hammond. I can't decide about the 5th one but my contenders would be Boycott, Grace, Compton, and May
Posted
I think Sutcliffe had a tremendous average and was definitely one of England's great bats. But for good reason the cricket pundits of his day always felt he wasn't greater than his partner-in-crime Hobbs and later Hammond I think he wouldn't even be among England's top 5 batsmen...surely in the top 10. Per me England's best batsmen were Hutton, Barrington, Hobbs, Hammond. I can't decide about the 5th one but my contenders would be Boycott, Grace, Compton, and May
Agree with you regarding the 4 names mentioned above. No.5 would definitely be Sutcliffe in my book, with only Compton coming close. And Eddie.
Posted
Agree with you regarding the 4 names mentioned above. No.5 would definitely be Sutcliffe in my book' date=' with only Compton coming close. And Eddie.[/quote'] I think you've opened up a can of worms here.
Posted
I think you've opened up a can of worms here.
Yes, I'm afraid it will boil down eventually to a Sachin vs X (where X is Bradman, Lara, Ponting, Federer, Pele, etc) thread. My intention was that statistically Stucliffe was G. Pollock and Headley's equal and was Hobbs' contemporary. It looks as if Pandora's box has been opened.
Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Posted
its the same reason why Kallis is not on the poll despite being statistically superior to SRT' date='BCL,Ponting. In short these are popular choices or atleast choices which that site felt were appropriate and has noting to do with stats.[/quote'] Yeah, that's true. I guess that's why Sanga isn't there either.
Posted

Hope we don't fall in trap of 90s were winning against Pakistan (in ODIs ) would absolve team from any bad performance or wrong doing....there is a world outside this subcontinental duel. To me anything less than winning in Aus,Eng and SA is just a blip in overall substandard performance by this team over last one year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...