Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Seriously ,Congress need to get a life .they are doing more good to him by publicizing and speaking about topics which doesn't mean a thing otherwise by the way I remember giving vote to Tendua lol right now Modi is topping the charts ROFL http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2107952_2107959_2107960,00.html Sachin at 26 th position :| Vote for Tendu here http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2107952_2107953_2110176,00.html

Posted
1983' date=' your valuable contribution is required on the other thread. One would love to get your insight on the SIT decision[/quote'] For them, Modi can simply do no/nothing right. Or actually Modi has no rights. For them, Modi should be questioned for everything even when evidence and facts supports Modi.
Posted
For them, Modi can simply do no/nothing right. Or actually Modi has no rights. For them, Modi should be questioned for everything even when evidence and facts supports Modi.
Forget the evidence and facts. All I want is same yardstick. Are the Gujarat HC or SC worthy judges or not ? Seems that when things go in favour of his detractors, it is justice anything else it is Modi's band. I am more than happy to say I don't know cause I really don't On a side note, today Gujarat HC just sentenced the 23 convicted
Posted

^ No, they are not worthy and you are living in delusion if you think the judicial system of India is above board. Right from Laloo to Tytler, there is a long list of thieves and murderers roaming around freely - only a fool would think that exoneration by such an inept and corrupt judicial system is a certification of innocence.

Posted
^ No' date=' they are not worthy and you are living in delusion if you think the judicial system of India is above board. Right from Laloo to Tytler, there is a long list of thieves and murderers roaming around freely - only a fool would think that exoneration by such an inept and corrupt judicial system is a certification of innocence.[/quote']Thats a very superficial and generalized view of the judicial process. Take the case of Tytler - he was allegedly part of a riotous mob during the anti-Sikh riots in which an estimated 3000+ people were killed and for which, in the last 27 years, a total of ~25 people have been convicted. Even if you remove Tytler from the picture, it is clear that the judicial system has abjectly and totally failed in the case of 1984 riots. In the case of Gujarat 2002 riots in which a total of ~1100 people were killed, the justice system has definitely worked to some extent (much better than all previous riots in India). A total of 250+ people have been convicted of various crimes, and around 300 more are standing trial, including ex-ministers, MLAs, corporators, policemen. In a single case of the Ode massacre, just a few days ago 23 people were given life imprisonment. I am not saying that the process has been perfect, but it is quite irresponsible to negate the fact that it has worked much much better than any previous riot case in India.
Posted
^ No' date=' they are not worthy and you are living in delusion if you think the judicial system of India is above board. Right from Laloo to Tytler, there is a long list of thieves and murderers roaming around freely - only a fool would think that exoneration by such an inept and corrupt judicial system is a certification of innocence.[/quote'] Right. So that yardstick should remain. It is all I ask. Whatever be the verdict.
×
×
  • Create New...