Virat Kohli vs Darren Bravo

[Era of Gold]

Bravo.

[mr cricket]

Kohli by miles. Bravo is an average player.

[GautiMaan]

Darren who?

[Number]

lol who ever is compared with Kohli starts falling down. Rohit Sharma, Akmal, Bravo. Cook is next in the line.

[Precambrian]

Bravo 19 tests, 1,420 runs @ 44.37. 3 hundreds and 7 fifties Kohli 10 tests, 703 runs @ 41. Unless I am missing something, Bravo has more runs and a better average than Kohli in tests at this point in time, so what is wrong in suggesting he's the better test batsman at the moment? People are a tad blinded by Kohli's amazing run of form in ODIs and T20s. Read the OP carefully again,

[Old guy]

Bravo 19 tests, 1,420 runs @ 44.37. 3 hundreds and 7 fifties Kohli 10 tests, 703 runs @ 41. Unless I am missing something, Bravo has more runs and a better average than Kohli in tests at this point in time, so what is wrong in suggesting he's the better test batsman at the moment? People are a tad blinded by Kohli's amazing run of form in ODIs and T20s. Read the OP carefully again,

ur missing seeing matches .. bravo has been getting worse ..i think he flopped at home vs aussies i think his average is inflated by scoring runs against our tundlers on flat tracks

[Precambrian]

ur missing seeing matches .. bravo has been getting worse ..i think he flopped at home vs aussies i think his average is inflated by scoring runs against our tundlers on flat tracks

And Kohli's was boosted tremendously by performing against New Zealand on indian wickets as well? Bravo had a dip in form, without doubt, but I think he's the class to come out of it and average 50+ in the long run. So does have Kohli. I don't want to make any definite judgement at this point in time. I hope this turns out to be the next Lara vs Sachin debate in the coming decade and half.

[Old guy]

And Kohli's was boosted tremendously by performing against New Zealand on indian wickets as well? Bravo had a dip in form, without doubt, but I think he's the class to come out of it and average 50+ in the long run. So does have Kohli. I don't want to make any definite judgement at this point in time. I hope this turns out to be the next Lara vs Sachin debate in the coming decade and half.

kohli did well vs australia away (kept getting better) bravo struggled at home any way its matter of personal prefrence when i see them both bat kohli looks like better bat there would be no point of discussion if we were to just see stats and judge...every one can do that

[rkt.india]

And Kohli's was boosted tremendously by performing against New Zealand on indian wickets as well? Bravo had a dip in form, without doubt, but I think he's the class to come out of it and average 50+ in the long run. So does have Kohli. I don't want to make any definite judgement at this point in time. I hope this turns out to be the next Lara vs Sachin debate in the coming decade and half.

Don't think so. He is a poor man's Lara. He won't average over 45 in long run. Till now he has struggled facing good bowling. In England and in West Indies as well. Think Samuels outbatted him in England while England bowlers were not even at their best.

[achilles]

Tbh, haven't seen as much of Darren, as I have of Virat. So I'll pick Virat.