randomGuy Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 People don't give a rat's ***** about "honest politics"... You'll be pleasantly surprised to know that on May the16th... Talking about Amethi and Varanasi - Even if we ignore the issues for a while and talk about campaigning - Many AAP leaders with good oratory skills will focus on Amethi and Varanasi to leave it dazzled by a blitzkrieg of rallies.
ravishingravi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 People don't give a rat's ***** about "honest politics"... You'll be pleasantly surprised to know that on May the16th... Please tell me who is doing honest politics ? I ll vote for them.
ravishingravi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 This is fundamental shift in India's history. The future will be volatile and vicious till it settles down. There will be many forces at work from both outside and inside the country trying to sabotage the situation. It will require great leadership and elite group of ministers to make this a success.
bulbul Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Talking about Amethi and Varanasi - Even if we ignore the issues for a while and talk about campaigning - Many AAP leaders with good oratory skills will focus on Amethi and Varanasi to leave it dazzled by a blitzkrieg of rallies. Dont insult people,every one learnt lessons from Delhi fiasco.
adi B Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 shehzada,cong going after modi over his marriage status issue.main muddde bhoolke is par chunav lado :cantstop:, more publicity for modi
JaiRamesh2 Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Lol now news that even the Manmahon Singh left the spouse column blank when filing his paper in Assam for 2009 Lok Sabha. Also BJP spokie Sitaraman on newshour saying new Supreme Court ruling in 2013 forces candidates to put down their marital status whilst before one could leave it unanswered.
scorpio90 Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 NYT taken to task for their lies on Modi's child marriage https://storify.com/neha_aks/annals-of-spin-nyt-taken-to-task
randomGuy Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Dont insult people' date='every one learnt lessons from Delhi fiasco.[/quote'] I am not. You fellow modi bhakt had done it.
asterix Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 shehzada' date='cong going after modi over his marriage status issue.main muddde bhoolke is par chunav lado :cantstop:, more publicity for modi[/quote'] Would be interesting to know about Raul's marital status in coming days... Also would he be answering questions about his foreign GF since he is PM aspirant and will be handling lots of Country secrets...
Raghav_12 Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 What about wife’s rights, asks NCW http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/What-about-wifes-rights-asks-NCW/articleshow/33576518.cms NEW DELHI: Narendra Modi came under heavy criticism on Thursday from National Commission for Women member Nirmala Samant, who said it was very unfortunate that the BJP's prime ministerial nominee's wife was deprived of her right to property, maintenance and other privileges, and more so since Modi claims to champion the cause of the women of the country. Joining Samant was Congress leader Digvijaya Singh, who tweeted, "Modi accepts his marital status. Can women of this country trust a man who stalks a woman, deprives his wife of her right? Vote against Modi." Samant, in a statement, said, "Narendra Modi has disclosed this information, as there is a column in Election Commission's form where you have to disclose the assets details of your relatives. This is the first time he has disclosed the name of his wife as he needed to provide these details. It's very important as she has got justice after all these years. She is given respect and has been accepted as his wife. It's my personal opinion it should be investigated as to why the EC did not compel him to disclose this in earlier elections. There was no need to give him a special status." Congress Rajya Sabha MP Shantaram Naik said in Panaji, "Modi has to clarify why he filed a false affidavit in the last assembly election by not disclosing the name of his wife, and further, as to how and why he is not aware of the other relevant financial details of his wife." Claiming that he has verified the form filled by Modi, Naik said the BJP leader has mentioned "Mahiti Nathi" (information not known) in front of the columns pertaining to PAN card, financial year for which the last income-tax return has been filed, and total income shown in the income-tax returns. Naik said the concerned returning officer was duty-bound to direct the candidate to give the details which he has said "not known", failing which nomination papers should be rejected. Narendra Modi needs to answer some serious questions. This deserves to be investigated and should be handled in legal way.
scorpio90 Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Yup the same NCW who did not make a noise in Tharoor - Sunanda case which really needs to be investigated in light of her last words on twitter as well as autopsy report are now talking about women rights.
seedhi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 What about wife’s rights' date= asks NCW http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/What-about-wifes-rights-asks-NCW/articleshow/33576518.cms Narendra Modi needs to answer some serious questions. This deserves to be investigated and should be handled in legal way.Ajeeb had hai ! Who is the aggrieved party here ? The wife (who was married to Modi when they were both non-adults) has no complaints. The separation was mutual. She has not asked for anything. He has not refused anything. As far as not knowing his wife's financial details. That is quite obvious - they live separately, she has not told him about her finances and he has no right to know about her finances. They do not file taxes together. I fail to understand what is the controversy here.
Desi Cartman Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 What about wife’s rights' date= asks NCW http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/What-about-wifes-rights-asks-NCW/articleshow/33576518.cms Narendra Modi needs to answer some serious questions. This deserves to be investigated and should be handled in legal way. Its not a legal issue unless his wife wants it to be. Its a social issue, its between the couple. Doesnt matter how weird it is to read the word "abandoned" and "still praying for his success" and "real traditional Indian woman" , at the end of the day its between the husband and wife.
asterix Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 What about wife’s rights' date= asks NCW http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/What-about-wifes-rights-asks-NCW/articleshow/33576518.cms Narendra Modi needs to answer some serious questions. This deserves to be investigated and should be handled in legal way. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Oh the irony... Raghav concerned about Women's rights :cantstop:
seedhi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Once and for all, before September 2013, there was no requirement that the wife's details be mandatorily mentioned in the affidavit (as long as wrong information is not entered). It is not considered material information such as criminal cases, assets, liabilities etc. Even Manmohan Singh left the wife field blank for his Rajya Sabha election. In Modi's case, the it was a child marriage which has unclear legal status anyway. The wife did not want any limelight and this was enough reason to protect her privacy. After September 2013, due to a SC judgment, the Election Commission has made revealing marital status compulsory. And Modi has abided by the revised rules.
seedhi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 You can accost women in the middle of the night a la Somnath Bharti and make them urinate in the middle of the road. That is OK for AAPtards. But a child marriage which ended 45 years ago is supposed to be a big issue for them.
urbestfriend Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Indian media and general populace are really stupid to make these non-issues important. How does it matter to me if Modi abandoned his wife or Sonia didn't complete her education in Cambridge university but completed in Cambridge? But afterall politics is all about brainwashing with emotional issues, giving tall promises, attacking opponents with all sorts of frivolous allegations and inventing phrases that appeal to the people. What has out politics discourse come to?
Raghav_12 Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 You can accost women in the middle of the night a la Somnath Bharti and make them urinate in the middle of the road. That is OK for AAPtards. But a child marriage which ended 45 years ago is supposed to be a big issue for them. If marriage ended 45 years ago, why her name is being put on affidavit now?
urbestfriend Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 You can accost women in the middle of the night a la Somnath Bharti and make them urinate in the middle of the road. That is OK for AAPtards. But a child marriage which ended 45 years ago is supposed to be a big issue for them. Using all of state police machinery to stalk a woman who has nothing to do with national security is ok for Namorons. But a minister who requests and begs state police to raid illegal drug mafia on behalf of residents is not ok for them
seedhi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Indian media and general populace are really stupid to make these non-issues important. How does it matter to me if Modi abandoned his wife or Sonia didn't complete her education in Cambridge university but completed in Cambridge? But afterall politics is all about brainwashing with emotional issues' date= giving tall promises, attacking opponents with all sorts of frivolous allegations and inventing phrases that appeal to the people. What has out politics discourse come to?Firstly, Modi did not abandon his wife. The separation was mutual. It was not a valid marriage in the first place, both being 17 years at the time of marriage. To be fair to AAP (unlike some supporters here) - they have not stooped to the abysmally low level of Congress on this issue. It is a blunder by the Congress - but then they don't seem to have much to lose by the looks of it.
Recommended Posts