Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I mean its just a dummy post...what can president accomplish?? they are there to just sign..LOL I don't understand why you would want to become President...you can hardly help in changing laws or constitution.

Posted

well what can President do? they can only grant mercy to criminals LOL.. What I am trying to say, do we really need a President??

Posted

hmm, if you read in most cases President cannot act alone. He needs opinion and he has follow rule book. I am wondering, we borrowed everything from British..Does British have President??

Posted
hmm, if you read in most cases President cannot act alone. He needs opinion and he has follow rule book. I am wondering, we borrowed everything from British..Does British have President??
NO - AFAIK.
Posted

They have Queen or back in days Kings and Queen had more power... I don't knwo where we got this President/Governor concept??

Posted

because the next election is most likely to be a hung parliament. So whoever gets to put up the president has a slight more chance of being called to form the government and use that to buy seats.... and they do not want a sharp president who will actually do some work, like send back bills for revision if he does not like it, write his own speech, not follow the parliament line ... Like Kalam did :D

Posted

President plays an important part in electing a govt. having own partyman as president helps any party which desperately wants to stick to power...

Posted
I mean its just a dummy post...what can president accomplish?? they are there to just sign..LOL I don't understand why you would want to become President...you can hardly help in changing laws or constitution.
That's being cynical. Historically speaking President of India has often been one of the very best we have to offer and any country would be proud of having somebody like Radhakrishnan, Rajinder Prasad or Abdul Kalaam at the top. Giani Zail Singh and Pratibha Patil are notable exception of course. And it increasingly appears that the next President would join them too...:((
Posted
That's being cynical. Historically speaking President of India has often been one of the very best we have to offer and any country would be proud of having somebody like Radhakrishnan, Rajinder Prasad or Abdul Kalaam at the top. Giani Zail Singh and Pratibha Patil are notable exception of course. And it increasingly appears that the next President would join them too...:((
LOL. Does it matter if very best is president? As far as I can see, they cannot do anything. Even Kalam with all his vision etc. could not achieve much.
Posted
hmm, if you read in most cases President cannot act alone. He needs opinion and he has follow rule book. I am wondering, we borrowed everything from British..Does British have President??
does british have chief ministers??
Posted

I guess, with my limited civics memory, he is just a face for signing off important documents/decisions. e.g. on paper, he is supreme commander of armed forces, and can declare war/conclude-peace. But such things are hardly individual decisions, definitely not in India. And that applies to PM also - he may look more powerful than President - but I don't think he can take any decision on his own.

Posted
I don't understand why you would want to become President
Mate, you heard of the word 'legacy' ? Lots of powerful folks have that as their #1 priority. Being leader of Lok Sabha is one thing, President of the Republic of India is quite another.
×
×
  • Create New...