Sehwag1830 Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 :hysterical: Not sure whether you are serious :haha: :winky::--D
thongale Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 I think when we discuss about cricket in 1990s we must not forget half of the ODI at that time was played at Sharjah. And Sharjah was the toughest place to bat .Depends on the payment you had or your opponets had of course.
vvvslaxman Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Completely irrelevent point to the discussion. The discussion was on quality of cricket' date=' whether it was same or not.[/quote'] It is relevant. You suggest as if Bevan would have done much more in this era.. as if they are seperated by 50 years. Tendulkar played through both eras. Tell me exactly how his batting record improved after Bevan. Bevan era 328 12921 runs 44.86 avge 86.48 strike rate 36 centuries Post bevan era 135 5505 runs 44.75 avge 85.66 strike rate 13 centuries
vvvslaxman Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 I think when we discuss about cricket in 1990s we must not forget half of the ODI at that time was played at Sharjah. And Sharjah was the toughest place to bat . You gotta be joking. It was like a glass. Absolute patta. Shrajah was a very high scoring venue. Batting approach was different those days. Those days they would play slowly till 40th over and go after bowling in the last 10. Only Jayasuriya changed that trend. Aravinda de silva even in that era absolutey belted the bowlers.
Sehwag1830 Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 You gotta be joking. It was like a glass. Absolute patta. Shrajah was a very high scoring venue. Batting approach was different those days. Those days they would play slowly till 40th over and go after bowling in the last 10. Only Jayasuriya changed that trend. Aravinda de silva even in that era absolutey belted the bowlers. Sarcasm fail . :--D Sharhah is the place were legend Anwar had most of his 100s.
Ultimate_Game Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 I don't even know what the OP means :dontknow:
vvvslaxman Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 I don't even know what the OP means :dontknow: It is always a bad idea to start a thread when you are stoned :cantstop:
Raghav_12 Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 I think AlienSmith is nobody else but Sir John only.
Ultimate_Game Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 I think AlienSmith is nobody else but Sir John only. Naah... I don't see any reference to Kenya, Zimbabwe or Afghanistan :giggle:
thongale Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 It is relevant. You suggest as if Bevan would have done much more in this era.. as if they are seperated by 50 years. Tendulkar played through both eras. Tell me exactly how his batting record improved after Bevan. Bevan era 328 12921 runs 44.86 avge 86.48 strike rate 36 centuries Post bevan era 135 5505 runs 44.75 avge 85.66 strike rate 13 centuriesNah, this was about overall quality of cricket if you follow the context. Saying Bevan played a inferior game to Dhoni is wrong. The quality of cricket Bevan played may be even bit better than what Dhoni plays today. But that doesn't stop me picking Dhoni over Bevan. Dhoni's real competitor is not Bevan, but Hussey.
don_corleone840 Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Michael Bevan vs Mahendra Singh Dhoni (ODI's) Bevan: 232 matches, avg: 53, 100's: 6, SR 74, runs: 6912 Dhoni: 212 matches, avg 52, 100's 8, SR: 88, runs: 7021 Seems Dhoni edges it & has many years ahead of him. Thoughts?
Sidhoni Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Copy-paste! :cantstop: On Topic : We already have a thread on this.
Sidhoni Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 BUMP What an amazing innings y'day. Just reaffirming once again that Dhoni > Bevan.
Sidhoni Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 BUMP Gets India to 270/6 from 119/4. India get 100 in last 10. P'ship with jaddu 90 in 10 overs. Bevan can dream on.
vvvslaxman Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 BUMP Gets India to 270/6 from 119/4. India get 100 in last 10. P'ship with jaddu 90 in 10 overs. Bevan can dream on. i was about to bump this.. good one.
Old guy Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 in odis u cant even blame his technique as he has shown he can even play pace bowling well what a batsman..:hatsoff:
SLICKR392 Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 Dhoni > Bevan any day. Way better S/R + Capt. + WK and has a much crappier side than Bevan did.
Old guy Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 also he is big match player too ...and under pressure u can count on him to do well and hitting he showed today was amazing its like old dhoni (batsman) is back i think ever since world cup he has been by far the best odi bat? any one good with stats guru should check
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now