SLICKR392 Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 There is no big deal in few decisions going in our favor. DRS was pretty much at its best when we toured England :asleep: Having DRS would just hurt us!!!
Trichromatic Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 There is no big deal in few decisions going in our favor. DRS was pretty much at its best when we toured England :asleep: Having DRS would just hurt us!!! Yes, and we also collapsed from our best situation in the series after Broad got a hattrick even though he shouldn't have got that.
prasadiyer Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 The concept that best fits the original requirement - which is to eliminate howlers - is what I would call "BDRS", or Basic DRS. For this, you don't need Hawk-eye Snicko-meter, Hotspot, or what have you. A few good quality TV cameras should be enough. The basic premise is, if you cannot tell out from not-out using basic TV replay, then by definition whatever was decided on the field was not a howler. In keeping with the spirit of BDRS, the 3rd umpire shouldn't take more than 2 minutes - say - to make a decision. This has the added benefit of opening up more referrals. As I see it, with this you get low cost and hence universal adoption, and removal of most errors.
jairamesh Posted September 4, 2012 Author Posted September 4, 2012 The concept that best fits the original requirement - which is to eliminate howlers - is what I would call "BDRS", or Basic DRS. For this, you don't need Hawk-eye Snicko-meter, Hotspot, or what have you. A few good quality TV cameras should be enough. The basic premise is, if you cannot tell out from not-out using basic TV replay, then by definition whatever was decided on the field was not a howler. In keeping with the spirit of BDRS, the 3rd umpire shouldn't take more than 2 minutes - say - to make a decision. This has the added benefit of opening up more referrals. As I see it, with this you get low cost and hence universal adoption, and removal of most errors. :two_thumbs_up: It's too simple for the idiots at ICC to comprehend all this.
Crookbond Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 The concept that best fits the original requirement - which is to eliminate howlers - is what I would call "BDRS", or Basic DRS. For this, you don't need Hawk-eye Snicko-meter, Hotspot, or what have you. A few good quality TV cameras should be enough. The basic premise is, if you cannot tell out from not-out using basic TV replay, then by definition whatever was decided on the field was not a howler. In keeping with the spirit of BDRS, the 3rd umpire shouldn't take more than 2 minutes - say - to make a decision. This has the added benefit of opening up more referrals. As I see it, with this you get low cost and hence universal adoption, and removal of most errors. Good post! :hatsoff:
Trichromatic Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 McCullum Ashwin to McCullum, 1 run, 86.9 kph, hit on the pad, that looked very close, pitched very full, spun in a bit under the attempted reverse sweep, hit him in front of off, if there was no inside edge that was plumb, umpire gives it as runs, did not look to be an inside edge :cantstop:
Lord Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 McCullum :cantstop: :--D btw will DRS be there in WT20?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now