Jump to content

Will having no DRS eventually hurt us?


Recommended Posts

Posted
There is no big deal in few decisions going in our favor. DRS was pretty much at its best when we toured England :asleep: Having DRS would just hurt us!!!
Yes, and we also collapsed from our best situation in the series after Broad got a hattrick even though he shouldn't have got that.
Posted

The concept that best fits the original requirement - which is to eliminate howlers - is what I would call "BDRS", or Basic DRS. For this, you don't need Hawk-eye Snicko-meter, Hotspot, or what have you. A few good quality TV cameras should be enough. The basic premise is, if you cannot tell out from not-out using basic TV replay, then by definition whatever was decided on the field was not a howler. In keeping with the spirit of BDRS, the 3rd umpire shouldn't take more than 2 minutes - say - to make a decision. This has the added benefit of opening up more referrals. As I see it, with this you get low cost and hence universal adoption, and removal of most errors.

Posted
The concept that best fits the original requirement - which is to eliminate howlers - is what I would call "BDRS", or Basic DRS. For this, you don't need Hawk-eye Snicko-meter, Hotspot, or what have you. A few good quality TV cameras should be enough. The basic premise is, if you cannot tell out from not-out using basic TV replay, then by definition whatever was decided on the field was not a howler. In keeping with the spirit of BDRS, the 3rd umpire shouldn't take more than 2 minutes - say - to make a decision. This has the added benefit of opening up more referrals. As I see it, with this you get low cost and hence universal adoption, and removal of most errors.
:two_thumbs_up: It's too simple for the idiots at ICC to comprehend all this.
Posted
The concept that best fits the original requirement - which is to eliminate howlers - is what I would call "BDRS", or Basic DRS. For this, you don't need Hawk-eye Snicko-meter, Hotspot, or what have you. A few good quality TV cameras should be enough. The basic premise is, if you cannot tell out from not-out using basic TV replay, then by definition whatever was decided on the field was not a howler. In keeping with the spirit of BDRS, the 3rd umpire shouldn't take more than 2 minutes - say - to make a decision. This has the added benefit of opening up more referrals. As I see it, with this you get low cost and hence universal adoption, and removal of most errors.
Good post! :hatsoff:
Posted

McCullum

Ashwin to McCullum, 1 run, 86.9 kph, hit on the pad, that looked very close, pitched very full, spun in a bit under the attempted reverse sweep, hit him in front of off, if there was no inside edge that was plumb, umpire gives it as runs, did not look to be an inside edge
:cantstop:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...