fineleg Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 No WE DID NOT! WE SUCKED. I dont want a thread like this today. so started this to say we SUCKED in batting, bowling and most visibly in FIELDING!!!
fineleg Posted August 27, 2007 Author Posted August 27, 2007 Predz, Forgive me bro! Was trying to emphasize! Plus I get this impulse at times :-)
fineleg Posted August 27, 2007 Author Posted August 27, 2007 Veer, Buzz off...I told u i dont know who anu d is, and that is the truth. I have always been fineleg for the last few years at another forum. So, stop this nonsense accusations that you are throwing at me.
fineleg Posted August 27, 2007 Author Posted August 27, 2007 :eyedance: Dont fret too much Prince of Calcutta. All you have to do is simple - stop accusing fellow forum members. If you like or dislike a player, state that. No need to get into personal remarks against other forum members. After all you are lying when you say I am anu d or whoever the hell he/she/it is.
Cricketics Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 whatz harm in saying that fine leg?? gang and dravid batted well. so as yuvraj.. timed the ball well. didn't they?
veer Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 Dont fret too much Prince of Calcutta. All you have to do is simple - stop accusing fellow forum members. If you like or dislike a player, state that. No need to get into personal remarks against other forum members. After all you are lying when you say I am anu d or whoever the hell he/she/it is. calm down lady.. its just a game.. :regular_smile:
fineleg Posted August 27, 2007 Author Posted August 27, 2007 whatz harm in saying that fine leg?? gang and dravid batted well. so as yuvraj.. timed the ball well. didn't they? C'tics, Firstly, let me nitpick...SG did not bat great - he did ok. When chasing 280+, he has to score at a better strikerate. If he started slow, then sped up, that is fine, but then you cannot throw away after you have "consolidated" your innings. Secondly, the bigger point i tried to make: Saying we timed well etc is not going to cut it. When we say we batted well, it has to make a difference (or come close to it). Today we were not really in the game. So, no point in saying we batted well - we did very average today at best.
Predator_05 Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 India lost because they were 1 batsman short in the end. That is it. Stop whining and move on.
Ram Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 F'leg needs to calm down. Maybe this was the "dramebaazi" she was promising all of us.
yoda Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 Wow sooo much anger over a meaningless ODI ..... who cares ... how is it meaningless?
jf1gp_1 Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 how is it meaningless? because ganguly scored :D i have learnt a few tricks from others.
yoda Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 because ganguly scored :D i have learnt a few tricks from others. with bheem, prolly more like SRT didn't score. :giggle:
Ram Posted August 27, 2007 Posted August 27, 2007 Messers Ganguly and Sachin screwed it up for us with their "rollicking" starts. Cant be 35 runs in 10 overs , chasing 281.
fineleg Posted August 27, 2007 Author Posted August 27, 2007 F'leg needs to calm down. Maybe this was the "dramebaazi" she was promising all of us. BTW - I've never quite confirmed whether he or she. For now, I guess the opinion is she. Which is cool, since that helps the lez sorority :-)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now