Jump to content

Shocking umpiring by Dar.


Recommended Posts

Posted
DRS or No DRS. Poor umpiring from Aleem Dar. Gave poor decision to both sides thorough out the two matches. Cook though has been the biggest beneficiary of Dar's generosity, accumulating over 200 runs thanks to Dar.
If we or anyone don't use DRS doesn't mean that the Umpires are supposed to be trash!
Posted
If we or anyone doesn't use DRS doesn't mean that the Umpires are supposed to be trash!
+1 ,I don't understand how anybody be against DRS after watching recent test
Posted
Dar saved Cook in these two tests where he went on to score centuries. He wont be as lucky from here.
Was supposed to be on 60 something in the 1st Test and that sweep shot at 80 something in the 2nd Test. Stop bringing DRS us up its not an excuse for this filthy umpiring which also went against them.
Posted
Stop bringing DRS us up its not an excuse for this filthy umpiring which also went against them.
Once in a while umpires will have off days. No one can stop that. It's not that Dar has been consistently poor for years. You can't expect them to perform well in every inning. :winky:
Posted
Once in a while umpires will have off days. No one can stop that. It's not that Dar has been consistently poor for years. You can't expect them to perform well in every inning. :winky:
But they have been the same in all 8 innings in the series :idunno:
Posted
As an English fan I never thought id say this but I enjoyed not having DRS' date=' seems more exciting without it.[/quote'] Yes, the traditional way can be exciting and it's ok when bad umpiring decisions go both ways because it kind of evens out in the end. But, if either team starts to feel the pinch...then you realize the advantage of DRS. In the Aus-SA match, Du Plessis survived two bad decisions, with the benefit of DRS. Otherwise, SA would have lost today.
Posted
Yes' date=' the traditional way can be exciting and it's ok when bad umpiring decisions go both ways because[b'] it kind of evens out in the end. But, if either team starts to feel the pinch...then you realize the advantage of DRS. In the Aus-SA match, Du Plessis survived two bad decisions, with the benefit of DRS. Otherwise, SA would have lost today.
Really?
Posted
Yes' date=' the traditional way can be exciting and it's ok when bad umpiring decisions go both ways because it kind of evens out in the end. But, if either team starts to feel the pinch...then you realize the advantage of DRS. In the Aus-SA match, [b']Du Plessis survived two bad decisions, with the benefit of DRS. Otherwise, SA would have lost today.
and thats why the whole thing is fkd up. one man can have a major boost to his stats and team in one match because of drs and it can be the total opposite in another match where there is no drs. icc need to grow a pair and implement it all across the board or scrap the whole thing all together.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...