vamos_rafa Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Who will partner Umesh' date=' even if he is fit ?[/quote'] Jadeja/Chawla/Ashwin/Bhajji and all other spinner you can think of :winky: On a serious note, it would either be Ishant. But, my worry is, if Umesh is not fit, then we would certainly play 3 spinners.
Crookbond Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 How soon things change ... few days back it was Dinda and now it is all about Bhuvanesh Kumar and Shami Ahmed! There has to be some way to track player allegiances to posters and consider the shifts they make at the slightest sign of "swing" or "seam". :winky:
Cevno Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Jadeja/Chawla/Ashwin/Bhajji and all other spinner you can think of :winky: On a serious note, it would either be Ishant. But, my worry is, if Umesh is not fit, then we would certainly play 3 spinners. Nah, if we play 3 spinners then Jadeja will come in for a batsman. Otherwise it would have to be a turner. Ishant surely has to be out after the England series ?
Cevno Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 How soon things change ... few days back it was Dinda and now it is all about Bhuvanesh Kumar and Shami Ahmed! There has to be some way to track player allegiances to posters and consider the shifts they make at the slightest sign of "swing" or "seam". :winky: It was ? Name and shame.
Crookbond Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 It was ? Name and shame. You may have not but people were posting along the lines of - "We lost because Dinda/Harbhajan/Rahane did not play." Now look, it is just a casual observation.
Lord Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 You may have not but people were posting along the lines of - "We lost because Dinda/Harbhajan/Rahane did not play." Now look' date=' it is just a casual observation.[/quote'] not Dinda surely:haha:
Crookbond Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 not Dinda surely:haha: May be but there's enough time for people to turn their backs on Bhuvanesh or Shami once they don't perform for 2-3 games. :two_thumbs_up:
NareshK Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 May be but there's enough time for people to turn their backs on Bhuvanesh or Shami once they don't perform for 2-3 games. :two_thumbs_up: That's bound to happen to any bowler on flat, Indian wickets. People need to be patient especially with seam bowlers in India.
Lord Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 May be but there's enough time for people to turn their backs on Bhuvanesh or Shami once they don't perform for 2-3 games. :two_thumbs_up: no,we trust them:isalute:
CSK Fan Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Bk. People talk about helpful conditions but this guy also seams of the pitch. He can be are purr Asif and remember, Asif was far more impressive in tests with the red ball. BK has taken more wickets than Ahmed overall but of course people here are more impressed with speed gun readings.
Old guy Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Bk. People talk about helpful conditions but this guy also seams of the pitch. He can be are purr Asif and remember' date=' Asif was far more impressive in tests with the red ball. BK has taken more wickets than Ahmed overall but of course people here are more impressed with speed gun readings.[/quote'] bk has also played more matches no ? and in shamis favor until now he has not failed even once unlike bk also even today shami was more impressive imo
Cevno Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Asif was a seam bowler. Bhuvi is a swing bowler. Bit of a difference there. And have seen both bowl in FC cricket.
Number Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 also even today shami was more impressive imo Definitely, Bhuvaneshwar bowled some loose balls while Shami was very tight specially against Bell. Also at his pace he can be a bit erratic, while Bhuvaneshwar can't.
Old guy Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Definitely' date=' Bhuvaneshwar bowled some loose balls while Shami was very tight specially against Bell. Also at his pace he can be a bit erratic, while Bhuvaneshwar can't.[/quote'] he can bowl lot fuller then bk and still keep batsmen back since he has pace this is classic case when both bowlers have similar skills one with more pace just makes him better shami also gets late swing which is gr8 skill to have in tests and he can bowl reverse swing so wont be useless with old ball these are reasons i think he will make better test bowler specially in indian conditions
Cevno Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Bk will be better than him when there is swing in the air and the wicket is moist. Otherwise i would back Shami in tests.
Number Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 he can bowl lot fuller then bk and still keep batsmen back since he has pace this is classic case when both bowlers have similar skills one with more pace just makes him better shami also gets late swing which is gr8 skill to have in tests and he can bowl reverse swing so wont be useless with old ball these are reasons i think he will make better test bowler specially in indian conditions Completely agree. Although Bhuvaneshwar is still very young, can improve a lot. (Not the case with a lot of our bowlers :giggle:) Shami Ahmed looks around 25. :haha:
Old guy Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Completely agree. Although Bhuvaneshwar is still very young, can improve a lot. (Not the case with a lot of our bowlers :giggle:) Shami Ahmed looks around 25. :haha: some people mature earlier bhuvan actually looks like he is 20:hysterical:
saneindian Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Shami looks a safe fielder IMO. BK is obviously a quick mover
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now