varun Posted September 14, 2007 Posted September 14, 2007 Bowlouts are a bad idea, and it looks like they are trying too hard to emulate soccer. It's not analogous to a penalty shootout in soccer because: you are awarded penalties in normal course of events in soccer and so the penalty shootout isn't something that would seem weird. However the sight of a bowler running up to bowl at stumps without a batsman is absurd and bizarre. Moreover it takes away a key-element of cricket, i.e. the batsman. In soccer, atleast the key elements are there in penalties, i.e. a striker, a goal, and a GOALIE ! 20/20 would be much better off with extra time/overs instead of the ridiculous bowl-out
varun Posted September 14, 2007 Author Posted September 14, 2007 Its exciting ! :D Nothing else counts ! Ah but you'll find spinners excelling in bowlouts.. No fun in that :P .. You wouldn't find a bowler going full out to hit the stumps, it's sorta makes players hold back, which can't be good. I would rather have 5 overs each extra time
yoda Posted September 14, 2007 Posted September 14, 2007 we need a modified bowl out. - powerplay on - one over per side alternate continue if scores tied after one over each.
yoda Posted September 14, 2007 Posted September 14, 2007 This tournament is a bad idea. :bowwow: so far it has been more interesting than 07 world cup.
Ram Posted September 14, 2007 Posted September 14, 2007 This tournament is a bad idea. :bowwow: Its much better than WC , march '07... :giggle:
Predator_05 Posted September 14, 2007 Posted September 14, 2007 I would rather have 5 overs each extra time This is a good idea. I have never been a big fan of penalty shootouts in football either. Although, football at least allows two 15 minute periods of extra time (golden and silver goals). A cricketing equivalent would see both teams having a slogout over 5 overs. Whichever team scores more, wins. If it's still a tie, then go for the bowl-out.
simba28 Posted September 15, 2007 Posted September 15, 2007 bowl out is stupid.. it fhould be bat out for me.. one over each side
jf1gp_1 Posted September 15, 2007 Posted September 15, 2007 This tournament is a bad idea. :bowwow: i wasnt sure about this tournament but having watched a few games this is exciting stuff.
Bumper Posted September 15, 2007 Posted September 15, 2007 20/20 itself is a mockery of cricket. No matter how much lipstick we put on this pig of a format, it will remain a pig. I thought this bowl out added lot of excitement to an otherwise farcical format of the game. Frankly if not for the bowl out i wouldnt have had half the fun i had yesterday. That said ICC should continue having bowl outs in games involving Pakistan. For other countries, which have won something in recent world cups, we can have a 5 over extra time.
Cricketics Posted September 15, 2007 Posted September 15, 2007 may be they can modify the rule and make it like " captain of A team would choose which players would take part in bowl out from team B. and same thing captain of Team B would choose which 5 players would bowl out for Team A." would be fun..
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now