Jump to content

Remember the best wicket-keeper batsman in the world is Matt Prior!!!


dr_tooley

Recommended Posts

Posted
It's ok D_M' date=' I know you are a Dhoni fanboy :winky:[/quote'] Oh yea - not to forget the ad hominem based on straws. Seriously, not sure how ABDV is even a consideration as a WK batsman in Test matches.
Posted
THIS plus not to forget he actively gave up the role when offerred earlier as well. I think some people still need to start watching Test cricket and also use some common sense!
Pass on this message to Cricinfo team which has declared ABDV to have established himself as Test WK-Batsman. But, yeah, they need to start watching test cricket. Don't try to eliminate contenders to get Dhoni on the top, rather try to put an argument in Dhoni's favour to that he can surpass others.
Posted
Pass on this message to Cricinfo team which has declared ABDV to have established himself as Test WK-Batsman. But, yeah, they need to start watching test cricket. Don't try to eliminate contenders to get Dhoni on the top, rather try to put an argument in Dhoni's favour to that he can surpass others.
I can. they sit right next to me.
Posted

The day SA get a decent WK batsman, ABDV will not be their keeper. Or probably if he becomes the test captain soon, then again he will not be the keeper. In ODIs he has already stopped keeping citing the triple workload of keeper-batsman-captain (after just 2-3 series) Prior isn't the English captain either, so yes Dhoni is the best keeper-batsman-captain right now :P

Posted
Pass on this message to Cricinfo team which has declared ABDV to have established himself as Test WK-Batsman. But, yeah, they need to start watching test cricket. Don't try to eliminate contenders to get Dhoni on the top, rather try to put an argument in Dhoni's favour to that he can surpass others.
If every written word on the Internet is true, I would've called you by another name. It is true that Cricinfo is a very well established website but you have got to use your common sense. A sample of three Test matches to show someone is the best in anything is a straw man argument. The significant point here is that you are intelligent enough to understand that. Now, you have two options - [1] to accept your initial assertion was wrong, based on limited understanding and correct it OR [2] Continue to let your ego play over the argument and be a narcissist. Currently, I'm afraid you are choosing to do [2]. Many of us (including me) have done [1] (with a discussion with you itself, you may remember it very well). I don't think there's anything wrong to accept a reasonable line of argument rather than stick to a flawed statement.
Posted
If every written word on the Internet is true' date=' I would've called you by another name. It is true that Cricinfo is a very well established website but you have got to use your common sense. A sample of three Test matches to show someone is the best in anything is a straw man argument. The significant point here is that you are intelligent enough to understand that. Now, you have two options - [1'] to accept your initial assertion was wrong, based on limited understanding and correct it OR [2] Continue to let your ego play over the argument and be a narcissist. Currently, I'm afraid you are choosing to do [2]. Many of us (including me) have done [1] (with a discussion with you itself, you may remember it very well). I don't think there's anything wrong to accept a reasonable line of argument rather than stick to a flawed statement.
I don't know what is your point is. ABDV has proved that he is a capable test wicketkeeper. I won't rate him anyway inferior to Dhoni in terms of WK-ing skills. In fact what I saw in this (SA-Pak) series, I would definitely rate him ahead of Dhoni on WK-ing alone. In batting there is not even an argument. So I am going to rate him ahead of Dhoni in Test WK-Bat. Now ABDV is such a good batsman that if SA finds a better WK, they will accomodate ABDV purely on batting skills. So which of this logic is flawed? Stop making guesses about my thought process.
Posted

The OP needs to change it to current best Wicket Keeper Batsman. Cause if its all time, I bet it has to be Andy Flower. Adam Gilchrist comes next followed by maybe Alec Stewart.

Posted
I don't know what is your point is. ABDV has proved that he is a capable test wicketkeeper. I won't rate him anyway inferior to Dhoni in terms of WK-ing skills. In fact what I saw in this (SA-Pak) series, I would definitely rate him ahead of Dhoni on WK-ing alone. In batting there is not even an argument. So I am going to rate him ahead of Dhoni in Test WK-Bat. Now ABDV is such a good batsman that if SA finds a better WK, they will accomodate ABDV purely on batting skills. So which of this logic is flawed? Stop making guesses about my thought process.
Yeah his keeping was very very good Just cos he wasnt keeper from start does not makes him bad.. Infact prior was very bad at keeping when he came and has improved a lot since then Also i will rate abdv over dhoni anyday.. Half of byes he saved dhoni would not have even attempted to get near them:giggle:
Posted

:whack::questionmark: This thread. So two years of test batting Mediocrity is made up for with a Double century at home against a very average spinner. It's a very good knock no doubt but COME ON! GET SOME PERSPECTIVE.

Posted
In Tests outside the sub-continent, yes.
Prior averages higher in India than Dhoni does. Both average EXACTLY 32 in Sri Lanka. Dhoni has raped the Bangladeshi's whilst Prior hasn't. I'd still keep Prior thanks.
Posted
I don't know what is your point is. ABDV has proved that he is a capable test wicketkeeper. I won't rate him anyway inferior to Dhoni in terms of WK-ing skills. In fact what I saw in this (SA-Pak) series, I would definitely rate him ahead of Dhoni on WK-ing alone. In batting there is not even an argument. So I am going to rate him ahead of Dhoni in Test WK-Bat. Now ABDV is such a good batsman that if SA finds a better WK, they will accomodate ABDV purely on batting skills. So which of this logic is flawed? Stop making guesses about my thought process.
How can you rate someone the BEST at something on the basis of handful Test matches? Not to mention he fared poorly in 2 out of 3 Test series in which he was taking up the gloves. You can't be even serious to put down ABDV's name on the sheet as a WK batsman in Test matches. He hasn't kept in enough games to even warrant a nomination.
Posted
How can you rate someone the BEST at something on the basis of handful Test matches? Not to mention he fared poorly in 2 out of 3 Test series in which he was taking up the gloves. You can't be even serious to put down ABDV's name on the sheet as a WK batsman in Test matches. He hasn't kept in enough games to even warrant a nomination.
He has played 11 matches as a WK, I don't know what you are on about him faring poorly as WK. He averages 55 vs Australia He averages 40 vs England He averages 59 vs New Zealand He averages 88 vs Pakistan
Posted
How can you rate someone the BEST at something on the basis of handful Test matches? Not to mention he fared poorly in 2 out of 3 Test series in which he was taking up the gloves. You can't be even serious to put down ABDV's name on the sheet as a WK batsman in Test matches. He hasn't kept in enough games to even warrant a nomination.
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/44936.html?class=1;filter=advanced;keeper=1;orderby=default;template=results;type=batting
Posted
How can you rate someone the BEST at something on the basis of handful Test matches? Not to mention he fared poorly in 2 out of 3 Test series in which he was taking up the gloves. You can't be even serious to put down ABDV's name on the sheet as a WK batsman in Test matches. He hasn't kept in enough games to even warrant a nomination.
u still living in past he saved one match in australia played a blinderi n next one destroyed pak and nz all while taking up gloves
Posted
It's funny that you are reading too much about him having performed in these 3 test matches and placing him above the likes of Prior. ABDV struggled like anything in Eng/SA and this was the first time he has come to grips with the dual role. LEt him be able to continue this for atleast 2 years at a stretch' date=' then only he can be considered to be the best WK-Bat.[/quote'] and then his real test will be in SC. Keeping in SA where opposition is struggling to bat out 90 overs is not a big deal. He is born and brought up on those pitches.
Posted
and then his real will be in SC. Keeping in SA where opposition is struggling to bat out 90 overs is not a big deal. He born and brought up on those pitches.
+1 i posted something like this on other forum :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...