moniker Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 :blink: India is at 4??? How the heck does a country who gets thrashed home and away remain at no.4...:hysterical: Rankings are a joke... Remain at 4? India climbed to no. 4, dumbo.
express bowling Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Remain at 4? India climbed to no. 4' date=' dumbo.[/quote'] Also, we fell from no.1 to no.5. Quite a big fall I would say. SriLanka is so bad that we could not fall below them. Mr. Dumbo is forgetting that.
adi B Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 how the mighty pak have fallen :haha::hysterical: their avg score per innings in the last 4-5 years must be below 200 lol
saurabhg1 Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 :blink: India is at 4??? How the heck does a country who gets thrashed home and away remain at no.4...:hysterical: Rankings are a joke... Wrong statement.. that country is at 6.. :haha::haha: even when u r imagining things, u r imagining ur team to be at 4 n not at 1... very poor imagination I must say :finger::finger:
I6MTW Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 We have a chance to be no 2 as well if we whitewash australia and nz clean sweeps eng.
G_B_ Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 i dont think we will be number 2 We will be oscillating between 3-5 for the next 2-3 years. Its going to be musical chairs between India-Aus-Pak. These three teams are at the same level and depending on conditions. So you have SA comfortably number 1 England comfortably number 2 with India-Pak-Aus forming a pairing. Sl-WI-NZ forming another pairing.
DarthSimian Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 If this is how things are going to continue, then Cricket will become a dying sport.. heck people are already saying it is. Who would continue to watch a sport where one part of the world totally dominates the other? On the contrary, the limited overs cricket is what is preventing cricket from dying. There is less dependence on pitches as far as limited overs is concerned and more competition. More people come and watch limited overs whereas the ground is sparsely populated for test matches. There will be much more interest in cricket with the growth of T20 format. Giving tests a holy pedestal or providing it desperate attention is not going to do anything. Test is just another form of cricket, one which is losing spectators. There is a reason why SA swapped Boxing Day tests for Boxing Day T20 and why it was played in a full house. Stop blaming IPL for everything. If players prefer IPL, it is because spectators prefer IPL. And, I can see why they like IPL better than tests, since I am also one of them spectators.
Ultimate_Game Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 Don't care about the rankings. Just hope we show up in SA and by some miracle win the series Winning maiden series in SA and Aus should be our long term goal, and not Test ranking of 1. If we get #1 ranking, great but we have to break our series ducks in SA and Aus.
munafbhai Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 So much for Pak fans claiming "Tests is real krikut" :giggle: Now I'm sure they would be claiming "T20 is the King" :haha: One series outside SC/UAE is all it took for Pakis to be put back in their place :hysterical: Absolutely.... Nor for our dear Paki friends.....they will say TEST cricket is not important ...T20 is.:finger:
GoldenSun Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 On the contrary' date=' the limited overs cricket is what is preventing cricket from dying. There is less dependence on pitches as far as limited overs is concerned and more competition. More people come and watch limited overs whereas the ground is sparsely populated for test matches. There will be much more interest in cricket with the growth of T20 format. Giving tests a holy pedestal or providing it desperate attention is not going to do anything.[/quote'] The main focus of my argument was not spectator or pitch based. It was supposed to tackle the T20 only mindset that the new generation unfortunately has and how the western triumvirate has prioritised Tests over T20. I do not care what spectators prefer as long as the players of the national team show importance to the longest form of cricket. Whether you like it or not, Tests are the true indicator of a true cricketer. While I find T20s as relaxing and fun, they should not be thrusted into a higher pedestal either. I believe that you misinterpreted my post as "T20s and IPL is the sole reason why cricket is dying in India". My post was meant to reason that IPL was and IS a FACTOR in why the newer generation values T20 over Tests. The players have a higher incentive to play in the IPL and prefer it BECAUSE of the huge amounts of money involved. They get paid me than they do playing Tests for India. That is where BCCI becomes the root of the problem. It is prioritising the shortest format of the game to the point where sooner or later, there wont be a proper test team in India. Guys like Sachin, Dravid, Ganguly, and yes even Dhoni aspired to represent the country in Tests and ODIs after watching heroes like Gavaskar, Kapil Dev pave the way for cricket in India. Dravid noticed last year when he was meeting with kids, that they cared more about the IPL than they did for Tests, ODIs in general. I actually do not mind watching the IPL as long as country comes first over country. But you do not see T20s being prioritised over Tests in Australia, England, and South Africa do you? While it is true that T20s attracts crowds in those countries, the fans have realized long back that T20 is merely hit and run cricket and should not be preferred over the longest format of the game. Your argument would have been valid had the attendance in South Africa or Australia or England regarding tests dipped. But yet, Boxing Day Tests in Australia are very much cherished and the players yearn to feature in one. While this is not meant to generalize South Africa's overall population, I have a close South African friend on FB who explained to me that Test matches are much more preferred while the shorter formats are not. We can safely say that Tests are where England's preferences lie.
GoldenSun Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 Don't care about the rankings. Just hope we show up in SA and by some miracle win the series Winning maiden series in SA and Aus should be our long term goal' date=' and not Test ranking of 1. If we get #1 ranking, great but we have to break our series ducks in SA and Aus.[/quote'] I know how you are feeling. I just want India to show some spine in South Africa. The last thing I want are rehashes of 2011-12 England and Australia tours.
adi B Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 Don't care about the rankings. Just hope we show up in SA and by some miracle win the series Winning maiden series in SA and Aus should be our long term goal' date=' and not Test ranking of 1. If we get #1 ranking, great but we have to break our series ducks in SA and Aus.[/quote'] and how will that happen when the kaptaan fool will keep playing likes of jaddu,vijay,himself,bhajji,pisshant. miracle might happen for an odd test but to win such a series,u need a big 'jigra'
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now