vvvslaxman Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Since Jan 1, 2000 Indian openers performance in SA/England/Australia As you can see nobody has stood out in terms of average. Viru was good at the beginning then on his second trip sucked in all 3 countries.
Yoda-esque Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Sidhu now a Weatherman? :haha: "This is a sign of new brand of cricketers which is emerging. Cheteshwar Pujara, who is solid as a rock, the other Murali Vijay, who is like a volcano and this guy Dhawan, he is a hurricane."
express bowling Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Since Jan 1, 2000 Indian openers performance in SA/England/Australia As you can see nobody has stood out in terms of average. Viru was good at the beginning then on his second trip sucked in all 3 countries. Dravid and Karthik has been decent. Karthik's name is an interesting surprise.
vvvslaxman Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Dravid and Karthik has been decent. Karthik's name is an interesting surprise. Karthik had a decent England series. In the one test he played in SA he made 63 and 38 not out. Remember the match when They played Sehwag in the middle order due to bad form in the first innings. Despite Karthik's 63 in the first innings as an opener they promoted Viru up again pushed Karthik down to no.6 in the 2nd innings. Viru failed. In England after one failure he stood couple of feet outside the crease to negotiate swing from Sidebottom and ANderson. It paid off.
saneindian Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Karthik had a decent England series. In the one test he played in SA he made 63 and 38 not out. Remember the match when They played Sehwag in the middle order due to bad form in the first innings. Despite Karthik's 63 in the first innings as an opener they promoted Viru up again pushed Karthik down to no.6 in the 2nd innings. Viru failed. In England after one failure he stood couple of feet outside the crease to negotiate swing from Sidebottom and ANderson. It paid off. Maybe because DK was keeping for nearly 130 overs prompted that decision? On day 3 SA got out just close to end of the day, someone having kept for nearly 80 overs in the day should not be expected to go out and open the innings.
NareshK Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 I remember Karthik doing well as opener in that England series, especially in one test where the ball was swinging and seaming around and he played very well. Just goes to show you can do well in those conditions provided you have decent technique and more importantly, respect the bowling and the conditions, leave a lot of balls outside off and rotate strike as much as possible and then put the odd bad ball away. Gambhir and Sehwag in the previous tours of Eng and Aus were not patient enough and didnt work hard enough to score runs.
yoda Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 People still talking about Gambhir and Sehwag for SA. This pair has booked it's tickets for SA even if they score successive 0s in the next 3 innings.
vvvslaxman Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 Maybe because DK was keeping for nearly 130 overs prompted that decision? On day 3 SA got out just close to end of the day' date=' someone having kept for nearly 80 overs in the day should not be expected to go out and open the innings.[/quote'] No. That was not the case. They promoted him up for quick runs based on his first innings 40. He was in horrible form. A move that backfired big time. India was in great position to either draw or win the test.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now