Jump to content

I hate CSK


Laaloo

Recommended Posts

Anyways it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt that it was a close call and the benefit of doubt went to the batsman cause as Domaink rightly pointed out the upper corner of the bat did indeed cross the line, however marginally. Thanks for your participation folks and put the kanspiracy pipe down. :hatsoff:
It has been proven by all neutral media that the decision surprised the batsman and Fleming as well :cantstop: I don't think kitties would have won anyway but justifying this decision looks too desperate.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Madraasis gone nuts trying to justeephy Sreeeni mama - high level conpherenshe in place with Joda' date=' Raaam, and Bootiphul Mind.[/quote'] some of the lads who are justifying the decision are not even madraasis :giggle:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Logical Flaw... some part of the body or bat should be grounded in side the line. Upeer part of the bat can not be grounded. Even we agree with DomainK, it was out. Yeah, no it wasn't a close call. It was outright cheating from Cheaters Super King.
Take a look at the image and conclude for yourself how the bat looks beyond the line. Does it look titled to you? :winky: Yea, we cheated all the way by making a spectacular effort to beat the line on a direct hit. :giggle:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has been proven by all neutral media that the decision surprised the batsman and Fleming as well :cantstop: I don't think kitties would have won anyway but justifying this decision looks too desperate.
Forget about media and surprises etc. Look for yourself at the posted image. Do you see bat beyond the line or not?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more important question is do you not see that the bail has almost reached the ground in the frame you posted? :hysterical:
So you want the 3rd umpire to use how far the bails were off in a frame to extrapolate where the bat would have been when the bails were just off? :giggle: Looks like we have one more in the camp of those who do accept that the part of the bat (however small) is beyond the line in that frame. :nice: Only technicality is whether that part of the bat was actually grounded. All in a close call and benefit of doubt to batsman for effort. :two_thumbs_up:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you want the 3rd umpire to use how far the bails were off in a frame to extrapolate where the bat would have been when the bails were just off? :giggle: Looks like we have one more in the camp of those who do accept that the part of the bat (however small) is beyond the line in that frame. :nice: Only technicality is whether that part of the bat was actually grounded. All in a close call and benefit of doubt to batsman for effort. :two_thumbs_up:
The point of the argument is where the bat was 'the moment the bails were dislodged' and not where the bat was when the bails have flied a km away. The angle from behind the stumps clearly shows that the bat did not cross the line when the bails were dislodged.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we still discussing that run out? Did you conspiracy theorists see how easily CSK was able to finish off the chase in the end? Does anyone here actually think CSK would have lost, even if Huss was given out. :headshake:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we still discussing that run out? Did you conspiracy theorists see how easily CSK was able to finish off the chase in the end? Does anyone here actually think CSK would have lost, even if Huss was given out. :headshake:
Yeah. CSK would have still probably won, so no harm accepting gracefully that it was a horrible decision. :good:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...