zubinpepsi Posted April 30, 2013 Posted April 30, 2013 The umpires checking for a no ball when the wicket falls.. Why is it happening a lot in IPL?? you dont see this in INtl matches as often as you see in IPL.. Is there any reason to this??:hmmm::hmmm:
diga Posted April 30, 2013 Posted April 30, 2013 How else do you have a longer ad-break when a wkt falls?
Sachinism Posted April 30, 2013 Posted April 30, 2013 Yesterday was absolutely stupid. PK received a full toss in the last over, 3rd last ball I think, blatant no-ball for height, umpire doesn't give, nor check. Last ball, was sooo obvious it was a legitimate delivery and they go to check with the 3rd umpire. It seems 3rd umpire is just there for entertainment purposes
DomainK Posted April 30, 2013 Posted April 30, 2013 The umpires checking for a no ball when the wicket falls.. Why is it happening a lot in IPL?? you dont see this in INtl matches as often as you see in IPL.. Is there any reason to this??:hmmm::hmmm: It's a good practice. International cricket should adopt it. Umpires miss no-balls many times. When a wicket falls, they should just make sure there was no overstepping.
The Dark Horse Posted April 30, 2013 Posted April 30, 2013 Stupid rule, if the umpire didn't spot the no ball it's his incompetence-not the bowler's problem
someone Posted April 30, 2013 Posted April 30, 2013 They do it selectively for certain bowlers. Bowlers who are known to be prone to bowling no-ball deliveries. Such as Tait, whenever he takes a wicket, a review is done. Imo, that's a bit unfair.
Recommended Posts