Jump to content

Pakistan seem bent on picking batsmen who are well past their best, and for reasons other than cricketing merit


Recommended Posts

Posted

There are so many excuses being made by pakis. Fact is they have no good batsman. Thats why they are feeble. They keep rotating the same group of batsman over and over again. They get dropped cos they are rubbish and then get recalled cos the ones who replaced them do rubbish. This is some kind of myth that selctors are screwing them, they dont seem to be doing this with pak bowling, thats because pak bowling is actually good. They have no opener, shows how bad it is when paki above says umar akmal should open, now you see why farhat, toffe umar , nazir and co are tried again and again. There is no one else!!! The talent is not there. There are no great players to come in. Umar Akmal proven failure is now being hailed as saviour to come back. He will play for one year, do pants, then knives out for him and replaced by same failures he replaced. You do not have good batsman pakis. Get over it!!! Players not there!!! Even the best two jamshed and misbah are ordinary as always have pants strike rates. They cant rotate strike and either bloke or thump. Pakis seem to think they have some automatic right to be the best. If they are not the best and lose, then its cos match was fixed or slectors not picking best batsman cos of favouritism. When in reality its cos they are not good enough.

Posted
Yeah alright!!! Wake up and smell the coffee!
We have better batsman than India, Ahmed shazad, umar amin, haris sohail, umar akmal, jamshed, umar waheed, babar azam, shoaib maqsood, sharjheel khan are all good batsman but only 2 are in the current squad and one of them is not given a consistent run.
Posted
There are so many excuses being made by pakis. Fact is they have no good batsman. Thats why they are feeble. They keep rotating the same group of batsman over and over again. They get dropped cos they are rubbish and then get recalled cos the ones who replaced them do rubbish. This is some kind of myth that selctors are screwing them, they dont seem to be doing this with pak bowling, thats because pak bowling is actually good. They have no opener, shows how bad it is when paki above says umar akmal should open, now you see why farhat, toffe umar , nazir and co are tried again and again. There is no one else!!! The talent is not there. There are no great players to come in. Umar Akmal proven failure is now being hailed as saviour to come back. He will play for one year, do pants, then knives out for him and replaced by same failures he replaced. You do not have good batsman pakis. Get over it!!! Players not there!!! Even the best two jamshed and misbah are ordinary as always have pants strike rates. They cant rotate strike and either bloke or thump. Pakis seem to think they have some automatic right to be the best. If they are not the best and lose, then its cos match was fixed or slectors not picking best batsman cos of favouritism. When in reality its cos they are not good enough.
Umar akmal> rohit, karthik, murli vijay, raina
Posted
We have better batsman than India' date= Ahmed shazad, umar amin, haris sohail, umar akmal, jamshed, umar waheed, babar azam, shoaib maqsood, sharjheel khan are all good batsman but only 2 are in the current squad and one of them is not given a consistent run.
Dont even need to reply to this just.......:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted
Dont even need to reply to this just.......:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
And if it wasn't for your crappy bowlers making malik,hafeez and kamran akmal look like legends they prolly wouldn't have been recycled so much.
Posted
And if it wasn't for your crappy bowlers making malik' date='hafeez and kamran akmal look like legends they prolly wouldn't have been recycled so much.[/quote'] Now india gets the blame for pak having rubbish batsman:hysterical: Look pak have rubbish batsman, get over it and stop talking rubbish that you have a load of world beaters unfairly not selected. The fact you are metioning umar akmal as one of these world beaters who should have played and would have been awesome, sums up the plight you are in with the batting
Posted
Now india gets the blame for pak having rubbish batsman:hysterical: Look pak have rubbish batsman, get over it and stop talking rubbish that you have a load of world beaters unfairly not selected. The fact you are metioning umar akmal as one of these world beaters who should have played and would have been awesome, sums up the plight you are in with the batting
38@85 after 70 games is better than average, plus he can rotate the strike.
Posted
38@85 after 70 games is better than average' date=' plus he can rotate the strike.[/quote'] It's 35.50(minnow removed). Always have to remove minnows with Pakis. These guys play a lot of them. They are the only guys who have series with Ireland, Scotland, Afghanistan etc.
Posted
There are so many excuses being made by pakis. Fact is they have no good batsman. Thats why they are feeble. They keep rotating the same group of batsman over and over again. They get dropped cos they are rubbish and then get recalled cos the ones who replaced them do rubbish. This is some kind of myth that selctors are screwing them, they dont seem to be doing this with pak bowling, thats because pak bowling is actually good. They have no opener, shows how bad it is when paki above says umar akmal should open, now you see why farhat, toffe umar , nazir and co are tried again and again. There is no one else!!! The talent is not there. There are no great players to come in. Umar Akmal proven failure is now being hailed as saviour to come back. He will play for one year, do pants, then knives out for him and replaced by same failures he replaced. You do not have good batsman pakis. Get over it!!! Players not there!!! Even the best two jamshed and misbah are ordinary as always have pants strike rates. They cant rotate strike and either bloke or thump. Pakis seem to think they have some automatic right to be the best. If they are not the best and lose, then its cos match was fixed or slectors not picking best batsman cos of favouritism. When in reality its cos they are not good enough.
Summed that up perfectly, whatever litle under 19 cricket i saw, their batsman's kitty looks empty, nasir jamshed is only half decent, umar akmal is a brainless slogger, If Robin Uthappa was a pakistani, he would have been a legend by now...
Posted
Summed that up perfectly' date=' whatever litle under 19 cricket i saw, their batsman's kitty looks empty, nasir jamshed is only half decent, umar akmal is a brainless slogger, [b']If Robin Uthappa was a pakistani, he would have been a legend by now...
true that:hysterical:
Posted

While Umar Akmal is no prodigy , I fail to see how he is kept out of the team when the rest of the batsmen are so poor. His selection should have been a no brainer That being said, I fully expect Malik and Jamshed to come good against India

Posted
It's 35.50(minnow removed). Always have to remove minnows with Pakis. These guys play a lot of them. They are the only guys who have series with Ireland' date=' Scotland, Afghanistan etc.[/quote'] not bad only 8 Indian batsman in the history of ODI cricket average higher without minnows.
Posted
Pakistan never had great batsmen. Just some flat track bullies and batsmen who would benefit from biased umpires like Shakoor Rana.
:agree:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...