King Tendulkar Posted June 20, 2013 Author Posted June 20, 2013 I dont even know how a test championship would be feasible. You see mostly empty stands for test matches in most countries in the world and boards are cutting down on test matches in a series. Considering how long a test championship would last, how are the boards going to make it work without sustaining big losses ? As for CT, I think this tournament could still work as long as its kept short like the current tournament. agree. Test championship although noble idea just wont work and will not attract interest
G_B_ Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Agree with Naresh on the test championship. mostly it will be 4 top icc ranked teams with semis and finals. Which will need probably about 2-3 weeks to compile.If india for some reason is not in the top 4 of that then IMO its going badly flop.
adi B Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 a test championship tie b/w 2 sides should have 2 legs home and away i.e 1 test each in both the countries..if both win each of the leg,the winner should be the one who won more handsomely..the final should be a one off test match at the neutral venue via a lottery or a bid done much b4 the commencement of the chamionship
Tendulkar_Bhai Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 I cant imagine general public enthusiasm for a test championship, it would be too long winded and slower paced for the non cricketing fans. Champions Trophy has no prestige but as mentioned cos we are doing well its easy to like! I also like the fact that it only includes the main 8 teams, so you dont have time wasting matches v Bang/Ireland. I would rather have this than a test format
namasteji1 Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Good event,like UEFA euro in football, but world cup is the best. I guess with world t20 and world cup, there was no room for such an event.
SLICKR392 Posted June 22, 2013 Posted June 22, 2013 Odds shorten on Champions Trophy repeat :woot: The 2013 Champions Trophy has been deemed such a success that it appears highly likely that the competition will be repeated. The ICC had originally decided to replace the competition with a Test Championship and the 2013 tournament would be the last one. But after excellent crowds and interest from around the world, the ICC are reconsidering that decision and will discuss their options at their annual conference, from June 25-29 in London. The ICC remain keen to promote Test cricket and feel a Test Championship would complement the World T20 and the World Cup and ensure there was a high-profile competition for each of the three formats of the game. While continuing the Champions Trophy would mean there were two global 50-over events, it is now thought there is sufficient difference between the Champions Trophy and the World Cup and sufficient interest from broadcasters for both to survive. http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-champions-trophy-2013/content/current/story/644313.html
Sachin=GOD Posted June 22, 2013 Posted June 22, 2013 must say that this year's tournament has been surprisingly good - but it could have been a LOT better if the ICC had used some common sense to schedule it in better weather. Hope they decide to scrap some of the meaningless ODI series' instead of this tournament.
bulbul Posted June 22, 2013 Posted June 22, 2013 must say that this year's tournament has been surprisingly good - but it could have been a LOT better if the ICC had used some common sense to schedule it in better weather. Hope they decide to scrap some of the meaningless ODI series' instead of this tournament. That's not in ICC hands, individual boards won't agree to scrap bilateral series.
Crookbond Posted June 22, 2013 Posted June 22, 2013 Is there an issue if the Test champion ship would be a Top 2-team, 3 match series with home/away and neutral venue series?
cowboysfan Posted June 22, 2013 Posted June 22, 2013 Is there an issue if the Test champion ship would be a Top 2-team' date=' 3 match series with home/away and neutral venue series?[/quote'] how is it a championship if only the top two teams play in it? .the problem is the individual boards wont agree to it with just top 4 teams playing,2 teams is out of the question.
Crookbond Posted June 22, 2013 Posted June 22, 2013 how is it a championship if only the top two teams play in it? .the problem is the individual boards wont agree to it with just top 4 teams playing' date=2 teams is out of the question. It is a championship because an FTP will be formed over 4 years and the final is played between the top 2 teams. Currently, the top 4 teams are selected and there would be a SF and Final. The individual boards have already agreed - it was the broadcasters deal (particularly from the ECB) which delayed it.
Rocky Balboa Posted June 22, 2013 Posted June 22, 2013 They got good ratings bcoz India reached finals....they gotta make sure that we reach finals ever time if they want to keep this tournament alive...:--D
Cricket Tragic Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 They should let it go imo. Besides India making the final, this year has been good because it has been in England where you get decent support for pretty much every team. A tournament in India, for example, would be played out in front of empty stands.
NareshK Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 They should let it go imo. Besides India making the final, this year has been good because it has been in England where you get decent support for pretty much every team. A tournament in India, for example, would be played out in front of empty stands. :hysterical: Are you serious ? There were mostly empty stands even when England was playing. The only matches which had decent crowds were matches featuring India, Pak and SL because of the expatriates. I also have to say, the atmosphere for cricket in England is poor. Its alright for test matches but very boring for ODIs and T20s.
Cricket Tragic Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 :hysterical: Are you serious ? There were mostly empty stands even when England was playing. The only matches which had decent crowds were matches featuring India, Pak and SL because of the expatriates. I also have to say, the atmosphere for cricket in England is poor. Its alright for test matches but very boring for ODIs and T20s. 12 of the 15 games will have had sell-out crowds (defined as a minimum 95% of the ground capacity)
bulbul Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 They should let it go imo. Besides India making the final, this year has been good because it has been in England where you get decent support for pretty much every team. A tournament in India, for example, would be played out in front of empty stands. Agree. Only Indian matches will be sold out , matches played between neutral teams are always played against mostly empty stands even during WC 11. Even the Champions league T20 , neutral teams attract very few people even if ticket prices are low.
bulbul Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 12 of the 15 games will have had sell-out crowds (defined as a minimum 95% of the ground capacity) One reason may be capacity of stadiums are less compared to India [20 to 25k?]
Mahaa Raavana Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 Cricinfo reports there is a good chance of CT being continued after its success in this edition.This is good news for cricket fans.:agree: To find space in the busy international schedule for CT,all they have to do is minimize the pointless bilateral series' such as the numerous SL-Ind matches we have every other week.I mean, aren't we all sick of seeing Rohit Sharma edging to Sanga or Dilshan mauling Ishant :roti:
StriKe Posted June 29, 2013 Posted June 29, 2013 Adam Mountford @tmsproducer 2m ICC confirm that the Champions Trophy is no more and they are pressing ahead with first World Test Championship in England in 2017
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now