indiaregulator Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Which is led by his father You couldn't make it up. :hysterical: http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2013/jul/13/stuart-broad-cleared-father-ashes
indiaregulator Posted July 14, 2013 Author Posted July 14, 2013 It's funny because it's about the most blatant bit of corruption I've seen recently but nobody can actually do anything about it. :hysterical:
Crookbond Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 I don't quite understand what the fuss is about. Who was the last batsman in world cricket labeled by the ICC as "against the spirit of the game" for not walking?
bulbul Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 I don't quite understand what the fuss is about. Who was the last batsman in world cricket labeled by the ICC as "against the spirit of the game" for not walking? You missed 'glorious' debate on match thread , if you get some free time check the thread :hysterical:
kubrickian Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Its so hypocritical because Chris Broad handed out a ban to Ramdin for claiming a dropped catch because it was against the "spirit of the game" but does nothing about this. :facepalm: Stuart Broad is a brat. This is not the first time he has done something like this. Haider's incident comes to mind.
indiaregulator Posted July 14, 2013 Author Posted July 14, 2013 I don't quite understand what the fuss is about. Who was the last batsman in world cricket labeled by the ICC as "against the spirit of the game" for not walking? The decision was probably fair but it shouldn't have been the accused father who had to make the decision :hysterical: It's a bit like a trial and the judge was the defendants father.
CSK Fan Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 complete nonsense' date='why should broad walk here?[/quote'] Point = > You =
kubrickian Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 complete nonsense' date='why should broad walk here?[/quote'] Why was Ramdin banned ? If that was against spirit of the game, so was this and this too deserves a ban. Also, it was not a small nick. It was a very big edge.
cowboysfan Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 my point is broad did nothing wrong,its not his problem Dar is blind.
CSK Fan Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 my point is broad did nothing wrong' date='its not his problem Dar is blind.[/quote'] Which is not what this thread was about
Crookbond Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 The decision was probably fair but it shouldn't have been the accused father who had to make the decision :hysterical: It's a bit like a trial and the judge was the defendants father. In that case, why use the result to call out unfairness. Conflict of Interest is a separate issue.
bulbul Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Which is not what this thread was about Indirectly it is , if Broad is not at fault then there is no question of he is breaching spirit of cricket.
CSK Fan Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Indirectly it is ' date=' if Broad is not at fault then there is no question of he is breaching spirit of cricket.[/quote'] It is about the farce of a father sitting in judgement over his son's alleged transgression. Nothing to do with the fairness of the decision
bulbul Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 It is about the farce of a father sitting in judgement over his son's alleged transgression. Nothing to do with the fairness of the decision Did you checked who is Referee for this match?
bulbul Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 People need to think before posting emotionally :giggle:
vvvslaxman Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 One broad saving another broad.. what is new :cantstop: and another resident broad is cheering it
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now