Jump to content

Stuart Broad cleared of being against the spirit of the game by the ICC Panel


Recommended Posts

Posted
:confused: I don't quite understand what the fuss is about. Who was the last batsman in world cricket labeled by the ICC as "against the spirit of the game" for not walking?
Posted
:confused: I don't quite understand what the fuss is about. Who was the last batsman in world cricket labeled by the ICC as "against the spirit of the game" for not walking?
You missed 'glorious' debate on match thread , if you get some free time check the thread :hysterical:
Posted

Its so hypocritical because Chris Broad handed out a ban to Ramdin for claiming a dropped catch because it was against the "spirit of the game" but does nothing about this. :facepalm: Stuart Broad is a brat. This is not the first time he has done something like this. Haider's incident comes to mind.

Posted
:confused: I don't quite understand what the fuss is about. Who was the last batsman in world cricket labeled by the ICC as "against the spirit of the game" for not walking?
The decision was probably fair but it shouldn't have been the accused father who had to make the decision :hysterical: It's a bit like a trial and the judge was the defendants father.
Posted
complete nonsense' date='why should broad walk here?[/quote'] Why was Ramdin banned ? If that was against spirit of the game, so was this and this too deserves a ban. Also, it was not a small nick. It was a very big edge.
Posted
The decision was probably fair but it shouldn't have been the accused father who had to make the decision :hysterical: It's a bit like a trial and the judge was the defendants father.
In that case, why use the result to call out unfairness. Conflict of Interest is a separate issue.
Posted
Which is not what this thread was about
Indirectly it is , if Broad is not at fault then there is no question of he is breaching spirit of cricket.
Posted
Indirectly it is ' date=' if Broad is not at fault then there is no question of he is breaching spirit of cricket.[/quote'] It is about the farce of a father sitting in judgement over his son's alleged transgression. Nothing to do with the fairness of the decision
Posted
It is about the farce of a father sitting in judgement over his son's alleged transgression. Nothing to do with the fairness of the decision
Did you checked who is Referee for this match?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...