The Outsider Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Problem with SRK is, he doesn't have much versatility. . He can do the odd Swadesh or Chak De, but his body language in every movie is exactly the same unlike Amir's. When Shahrukh walks or talks or laughs in any movie, it's always Shahrukh doing those things. In Amir's case, it's the characters doing it so each laugh will be different. Look at the speech in Chak De and see his mannerism, he is still shaking and moving, exactly like his speech in Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gum, his body language doesn't change, he is a limited actor. Of Course Salman is much more limited but he doesn't pretend to be a good actor Shahrukh Khan is 10 times more versatile than Aamir Khan - proof is in the pudding. Aamir Khan refused Darr, before it was offered to Shahrukh, which made him a superstar from a star.
InjusticeServed Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Lagaan and Gadar released on same day, I prefer Sunny Deols thunder performance to Aamirs in Lagaan. Lagaan was a better movie though.
jalebi_bhai Posted July 27, 2013 Author Posted July 27, 2013 Problem with SRK is, he doesn't have much versatility. . He can do the odd Swadesh or Chak De, but his body language in every movie is exactly the same unlike Amir's. When Shahrukh walks or talks or laughs in any movie, it's always Shahrukh doing those things. In Amir's case, it's the characters doing it so each laugh will be different. Look at the speech in Chak De and see his mannerism, he is still shaking and moving, exactly like his speech in Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gum, his body language doesn't change, he is a limited actor. Of Course Salman is much more limited but he doesn't pretend to be a good actor I think he is quite versatile tbf........it's just that his bakri-waale 'Kkkkkk.....Kiran' turrets keep acting up whenever he acts.......irrespective of his role......and when it is apparent.......you chuckle in your mind and call him a chew-tiya.....:giggle:
InjusticeServed Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Also SRKs performance in movies like Koyla, Chahat and Anjaam is top notch.
The Outsider Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Also SRKs performance in movies like Koyla' date=' Chahat and Anjaam is top notch.[/quote'] Either you are trolling or you have no idea what acting is about.:giggle:
trundlerNO1 Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Shahrukh Khan is 10 times more versatile than Aamir Khan - proof is in the pudding. Aamir Khan refused Darr' date=' before it was offered to Shahrukh, which made him a superstar from a star.[/quote'] didn't refused Aamir had problem with climax of the film Both parties agreed
adi B Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Shahrukh Khan is 10 times more versatile than Aamir Khan - proof is in the pudding. Aamir Khan refused Darr' date=' before it was offered to Shahrukh, which made him a superstar from a star.[/quote'] :hysterical:
InjusticeServed Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 SRK is bit like SRT, superstars in 90s and early 00s then they transformed to completely different person.
Detonator Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Also SRKs performance in movies like Koyla' date=' Chahat and Anjaam is top notch.[/quote'] His off-screen acting is also top notch
trundlerNO1 Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Rangeela performance Can anyone play a better tapoori than Aamir, the answer is NO We saw how miserably SRK failed in Josh or Sakti he sucked :haha:
The Outsider Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 didn't refused Aamir had problem with climax of the film Yeah, he had a problem getting beaten up in the climax and so refused the film. Aaamir Khan's acting is so methodical that any trained actor can do it - there is no flair and improvisation.
Crookbond Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 SRK is definitely NOT versatile in the last decade or so - barring the odd Swades, Chak De most of it is the same old wine in a new bottle.
The Outsider Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Rangeela performance Can anyone play a better tapoori than Aamir, the answer is NO We saw how miserably SRK failed in Josh he sucked :haha: I can name 10 tapori appearances off the top of my head better than Aamir Khan's in Rangeela starting from Dev Anand in Bambai Ka Babu.
adi B Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 amir khan is a very good actor,he is pretty natural in acting..i will no way accept srk is better than AK..though both actors are physically and look wise below par for a hero
The Outsider Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 SRK is definitely NOT versatile in the last decade or so - barring the odd Swades' date=' Chak De most of it is the same old wine in a new bottle.[/quote'] I am NOT claiming Shahrukh Khan to be more versatile over the last decade - over the last decade all I can remember it BS like Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna and that last Yash Raj movie of whom I can't even remember the name. I am talking about their careers.
The Outsider Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 amir khan is a very good actor' date='he is pretty natural in acting..i will no way accept srk is better than AK..though both actors are physically and look wise below par for a hero[/quote'] So why did Aamir Khan refuse Darr, if he according to you he could have pulled it off? Just because he was supposed to get a few kicks in the climax?
The Outsider Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Anyways, as actors both are mediocre, with Shahrukh slightly better than Aamir. If we really want to talk about actors the conversation should be more about Naseeruddin Shah and Om Puri.
trundlerNO1 Posted July 27, 2013 Posted July 27, 2013 Anyways' date=' as actors both are mediocre, with Shahrukh slightly better than Aamir. If we really want to talk about actors the conversation should be more about Naseeruddin Shah and Om Puri.[/quote'] Yup Both are just okay, but I like Aamir films more than SRK My opinion on best actor is Nawazuddin Siddique I know he is new, but he is a DAMN GOOD ACTOR Gang of Wassepur-Fasial-:hatsoff:
Recommended Posts