Does it justiy to have dharmasena in ICC's Elite panel of umpires?

[SLICKR392]

from what i have seen of erasmus in the last 3 years' date='he is pure sh1t[/quote'] ++

[Square Drive]

Vineet Kulkarni is good and should immediately be given a few tests to make a claim for replacing adharmasena.

Never seen this Avineet guy? :hmmm:

[carnish]

Its Vineet not Avineet. He is Indian ... ofcourse you wouldn't be watching because India never play Sri Lanka at home ... We always play in Lanka or neutral venues.

[StriKe]

Kick him out :mad: Nearly cost us the match

[ThePhenomenal1]

that plunkett decision even worse. could have done damage

[saneindian]

DRS showed each of those decisions to be correct, wonder what the problem is.

[fineleg]

Force DRS on india Its the realistic (despite flaws) solution for howlers (despite DRS flaws)

[zep1706]

Dharmasena has been excellent in both the tests. I don't think he has made even a single mistake so far.

[saneindian]

Dharmasena has been excellent in both the tests. I don't think he has made even a single mistake so far.

Absolutely. Am surprised with the hate he was getting for making right decisions.

[CG]

Dharmasena does not look for no balls and goes to third umpire eveyr time a batsman is out.Icc should look in to it.

[BlueBee]

Dharmasena has been excellent in both the tests. I don't think he has made even a single mistake so far.

Absolutely. Am surprised with the hate he was getting for making right decisions.

Where on earth were you?? I bet you didn't watched the full match. Especially day 4 & 5

[zep1706]

Where on earth were you?? I bet you didn't watched the full match. Especially day 4 & 5

I watched the whole match, except the last session on Day3. Which decisions are you talking about?

[saneindian]

Where on earth were you?? I bet you didn't watched the full match. Especially day 4 & 5

Did not miss a single delivery. Tell me more

[BlueBee]

I watched the whole match' date=' except the last session on Day3. Which decisions are you talking about?[/quote'] 40.4 Jadeja to Ali, no run, huge, imploring, desperate appeal from Jadeja... but, after an age, Dharmasena shakes his head! .. 86.6 Jadeja to Plunkett, 1 leg bye, huge lbw appeal, for a moment I thought it was all over, Dharmasena shakes his head C'mon this two was clearly out .. Both umpires were mediocre in this match

[zep1706]

40.4 Jadeja to Ali, no run, huge, imploring, desperate appeal from Jadeja... but, after an age, Dharmasena shakes his head! .. 86.6 Jadeja to Plunkett, 1 leg bye, huge lbw appeal, for a moment I thought it was all over, Dharmasena shakes his head C'mon this two was clearly out .. Both umpires were mediocre in this match

In both those cases there was enough doubt about the point of impact, in fact DRS would have kept the on field calls. So none of these are poor decisions. You are calling them poor just because they did not go our way.

[jalebi_bhai]

He's a piss poor umpire.....needs to be demoted.....

[BlueBee]

In both those cases there was enough doubt about the point of impact' date=' in fact DRS would have kept the on field calls. So none of these are poor decisions. You are calling them poor just because they did not go our way.[/quote'] No no dude..It was not a very tough decision to make for an elite panel Umpire IMO. And not only do I think he was poor, many else does. I would ve said this even if it were by Eng and not us.

[Stuge]

He sucks .. enough said

[ThePhenomenal1]

dharmasena must have been distraught over sri lanka's recent loss to SA. almost cost us the match

[adi B]

i think dharmasena has been pretty good in both the matches,the only blundr which i can think of is that plunkett lbw decision not given.i thought oxenford was pretty poor but it can happen