Jump to content

BCCI probe finds 4 players guilty. Sreesanth, Chavan recieve life ban


CSK Fan

Recommended Posts

Posted
http://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/news/214004-bcci-probe-finds-4-rajasthan-royals-players-guilty-of-spot-fixing-in-ipl-reports?pfrom=home-lateststories
The BCCI probe into the Indian Premier League spot-fixing scandal has found four Rajasthan Royals players guilty of spot-fixing during IPL 6. According to reports, the probe panel chief Ravi Sawani has recommended bans ranging from five years to life for the guilty players. The fate of the cricketers implicated in the IPL spot-fixing scandal will be up for discussion when the BCCI's disciplinary committee meets in New Delhi today to deliberate on Anti-Corruption Unit chief Ravi Sawani's report on the scam that shamed the Twenty20 league. Five Rajasthan Royals players S Sreesanth, Ajit Chandila, Ankeet Chavan, Harmeet Singh and Siddharth Trivedi have been asked to attend the disciplinary committee meeting. However, it is unlikely that Chandila will attend the meet as he was granted bail just a few days ago. As per BCCI rules, a player needs to be give one-weeks notice to attend a disciplinary meeting
So much for Sree
Posted

Sid Trivedi is the 4th one Sawani says Trivedi took fix money from Chandila, took gifts but later on returned money.

Sawani on Sreesanth According to Sreesanth, the only reason he admitted certain wrongdoings before Delhi Police and signed some confessional statements was to make the police officials happy and get out. He further told Sawani that the confessions were a result of continuous torture and interrogation. However Delhi police officials told Sawani, “When Jiju told Sreesanth that he had already told the police everything and that there was no point hiding facts any further, both cried and hugged each other before Sreesanth also admitted to being part of the fix.” Sawani’s takeaway: “I am fully convinced that Sreesanth was part of the fix and, therefore, I confirm my earlier findings of holding S Sreesanth guilty of the offences listed in my initial report.” Sawani on Amit Singh According to Amit Singh, Chandila never fixed anything during a match and was simply out to make a quick buck. He was instead fooling the bookies by simply accepting money from them. Chandila even called up Amit Singh and complained that the bookies were harassing him with repeated calls. But Amit appears to be “the bad fish that spoils the entire pond” as he got players in touch with the fixers. He gave out the numbers of the players and even made personal introductions. Sawani’s takeway: “He deserves no sympathy and I hold him guilty of all offences listed against him.” Sawani on Trivedi He took money from Chandila for meeting bookies, allowed Chandila and Amit Singh to buy him gifts but said that he only took the money but never agreed to fix. Trivedi said that he gave back Rs 2.5 lakh to Chandila and Rs 1 lakh to Amit Singh. Sawani has mentioned that Trivedi is “30 years old and fully capable of comprehending why people were buying him gifts and gifting enormous sums of money.”
http://www.firstpost.com/sports/sawani-report-sreesanth-a-fixer-amit-the-bad-fish-and-trivedi-in-the-know-1106261.html?utm_source=ref_article
Posted

If Trivedi was not involved in fixing then why his name is in culprit just because he took gifts. I don't think he should be convicted without even committing a crime.

Posted
If Trivedi was not involved in fixing then why his name is in culprit just because he took gifts. I don't think he should be convicted without even committing a crime.
Trivedi said that he gave back Rs 2.5 lakh to Chandila and Rs 1 lakh to Amit Singh. Sawani has mentioned that Trivedi is “30 years old and fully capable of comprehending why people were buying him gifts and gifting enormous sums of money.â€
If he knew about what these lot were up to, he should have reported them. IMO, he is equally faulty.
Posted
If he knew about what these lot were up to' date=' he should have reported them. IMO, he is equally faulty.[/quote'] Not equally faulty, will get a redcued punishment. But his career could be over. Has he been named in Royals squad for CLT20?
Posted
If he knew about what these lot were up to' date=' he should have reported them. IMO, he is equally faulty.[/quote'] He might not have done what was right at that time, but he has not done anything wrong too.
Posted
Not equally faulty' date=' will get a redcued punishment. But his career could be over. Has he been named in Royals squad for CLT20?[/quote'] According to CI, he is in the RR squad.
Posted

to be fair, the form Maneria appears to be in with bat and ball. I dont think RR will particularly miss Chandila or Chavan. @Gunner on second reading Harmeet might be cleared as it says 5 players called and 4 punished

Posted
to be fair, the form Maneria appears to be in with bat and ball. I dont think RR will particularly miss Chandila or Chavan. @Gunner on second reading Harmeet might be cleared as it says 5 players called and 4 punished
Chandila had done more than a decent job for us until he turned out to be a *****. Chavan wasn't that great and I presume, Hogg might play. Edit : Hogg isn't in the squad.
Posted
It says it has found four :rr: players guilty. Out of the two Harmeet and Trivedi 1 must be guilty then?
Trivedi is guilty because he took money and gifts though did not commit to them, not Harmeet.
Posted
“When Jiju told Sreesanth that he had already told the police everything and that there was no point hiding facts any further, both cried and hugged each other before Sreesanth also admitted to being part of the fix.â€
Sreesanth, you're a dumb **** cheat, and suck as player and suck in general as a human being. Now go piss off. Glad to finally get rid of you and away from cricket.
Posted

dont think Harmeet and Trivedi are gonna be punished as strictly.The four must be Sreesanth,Chandila,Chavan and Amit Singh atleast I hope that :pray:

Posted
Trivedi is guilty because he took money and gifts though did not commit to them' date=' not Harmeet.[/quote'] Harmeet was also approached but did not report,though he didnt recive gifts I guess

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...