Old guy Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Yes he should improve his skills with the older ball but even now with his ability to swing it both ways with the new ball places him ahead of most Indian bowlers. And then again' date=' you can't have a McGrath, if Shami swings it one way, he has very good seam movement and Bhuvi is more of a swing bowler, so there's not much he does with the older ball.[/quote'] shami can reverse swing..so can yadav so they are always handful with older ball my point is you cannot play some one who is only useful for 6-7 overs for too long unless you have some one proper bowlers to do work with older ball . in most of tests you wont even get this much swing with new ball and most of times fast bowler come back in india in third spell with older ball which is reversing . he is not really as bettter he is made to sound TBH ..i will take guys like pandey and umesh over him anyday in test cricket
Sidhoni Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 shami can reverse swing..so can yadav so they are always handful with older ball my point is you cannot play some one who is only useful for 6-7 overs for too long unless you have some one proper bowlers to do work with older ball . in most of tests you wont even get this much swing with new ball and most of times fast bowler come back in india in third spell with older ball which is reversing . he is not really as bettter he is made to sound TBH ..i will take guys like pandey and umesh over him anyday in test cricket You got to look at the overall package. Now if you are debating on Bhuvi vs Yadav selection for this match that is a different thing altogether?
Old guy Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 You got to look at the overall package. Now if you are debating on Bhuvi vs Yadav selection for this match that is a different thing altogether? what over all package ? i am debating for bhuvi improving his older ball skills in india as its his home conditions and its not really too much to ask tbh..
rkt.india Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 You got to look at the overall package. Now if you are debating on Bhuvi vs Yadav selection for this match that is a different thing altogether? Overall package makes Yadav a better option. Can ball with both old and new ball.
CSK Fan Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Bhuvi does worry me on pitches in India. Yes he id deadly with the new ball. But what after that? 3 bowlers, 2 fast (Yadav and Shami) and one new swing bowler, would be ideal But for Bhuvi to improve with old ball, he has to be provided with a chance by the captain. Today, after the ball change, the ball was reversing like crazy, yet captain didn't give him a chance to at least try
CSK Fan Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 what over all package ? i am debating for bhuvi improving his older ball skills in india as its his home conditions and its not really too much to ask tbh.. I wouldn't say Bhuvi is bad with the old ball till he gets enough chances. He has done well with old ball in domestic. Today he was denied a chance to ball with the changed ball which was reverse swinging
Old guy Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 I wouldn't say Bhuvi is bad with the old ball till he gets enough chances. He has done well with old ball in domestic. Today he was denied a chance to ball with the changed ball which was reverse swinging i have never seen him reverse older ball or seam or swing it in odis he can be tight with older ball but i do not see how he iwll pick wickets
Sidhoni Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 what over all package ? i am debating for bhuvi improving his older ball skills in india as its his home conditions and its not really too much to ask tbh.. Fair enough. Overall package makes Yadav a better option. Can ball with both old and new ball. For tests, yes. But its the right decision to play Bhuvi today ahead of Yadav.
CG Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Overall package makes Yadav a better option. Can ball with both old and new ball. Yadav is better than bhuvi both with new ball and old ball .
Old guy Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Fair enough. For tests, yes. But its the right decision to play Bhuvi today ahead of Yadav. how ?
rkt.india Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 I wouldn't say Bhuvi is bad with the old ball till he gets enough chances. He has done well with old ball in domestic. Today he was denied a chance to ball with the changed ball which was reverse swinging No. He has not. He normally plays in helpful conditions in UP for new ball and usually picks wickets early on, so there is not much left do with old ball. I still remember last year's match against Baroda which was live. He was good with new ball and then could not do much till the second new ball arrived.
rkt.india Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 3 bowlers, 2 fast (Yadav and Shami) and one new swing bowler, would be ideal Today, after the ball change, the ball was reversing like crazy, yet captain didn't give him a chance to at least try He did bowl that over but nothing happened. 72.1 Kumar to Chanderpaul, no run, too wide outside off stump for Chanderpaul to play a shot 72.2 Kumar to Chanderpaul, no run, Chanderpaul was looking to punch that through cover but mis-hit it back down the pitch and to the bowler 72.3 Kumar to Chanderpaul, no run, bowled fuller but too wide outside off, Chanderpaul lets it go again 72.4 Kumar to Chanderpaul, no run, played off the back foot towards point 72.5 Kumar to Chanderpaul, no run, Chanderpaul lets another one go outside off stump 72.6 Kumar to Chanderpaul, no run, Chanderpaul pulls his bat inside the line of another ball that slants across him
Sidhoni Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 how ? Bhuvi's been playing recently, been in form, been our best fast bowler across formats in the past season. He was sure to play, the question was between Shami and Yadav, and Shami being in form was picked.
Old guy Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 No. He has not. He normally plays in helpful conditions in UP for new ball and usually picks wickets early on' date=' so there is not much left do with old ball. I still remember last year's match against Baroda which was live. He was good with new ball and then could not do much till the second new ball arrived.[/quote'] exactly today shami bowled a god spell against weak team so it was not a problem but if we are bowling 4 bowlers at home then each and everyone of them should be able to bowl with older ball..
Old guy Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Bhuvi's been playing recently' date=' been in form, been our best fast bowler across formats in the past season. He was sure to play, the question was between Shami and Yadav, and Shami being in form was picked.[/quote'] across formats does not counts as it was test selection and if it did bhuvi just picked 1 wicket of slog in last whole odi series :winky: yadav sucked in odis even before and sucked wwhen he as doing well in tests so i do not know how it even matters
Old guy Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 How does Yadav not doing well in ODIs come into this? you your self said it is reason he was not picked .
Sidhoni Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Yadav didn't play many tests in the past season. The only place where I saw his bowling was the CT, the Challenger trophy and followed his Ranji match on cricinfo. Combining all 3, it would be safe to say he was ordinary. A player has to fight his way back in the team if he gets out due to injury. Yadav hasn't really done enough to be in the 2 slots available for pacers. I would have loved to see him in action too but at the moment BK and Shami look like better options. If only we could play all 3!
Number Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Yadav didn't play many tests in the past season. The only place where I saw his bowling was the CT' date=' the Challenger trophy and followed his Ranji match on cricinfo. Combining all 3, it would be safe to say he was ordinary. [b']A player has to fight his way back in the team if he gets out due to injury. Yadav hasn't really done enough to be in the 2 slots available for pacers. I would have loved to see him in action too but at the moment BK and Shami look like better options. If only we could play all 3! Doesn't apply to everyone though. Dhoni keeps whoever he likes and drops whoever he likes.
rkt.india Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Yadav didn't play many tests in the past season. The only place where I saw his bowling was the CT' date=' the Challenger trophy and followed his Ranji match on cricinfo. Combining all 3, it would be safe to say he was ordinary. [b']A player has to fight his way back in the team if he gets out due to injury. Yadav hasn't really done enough to be in the 2 slots available for pacers. I would have loved to see him in action too but at the moment BK and Shami look like better options. If only we could play all 3! It never happens. It was not like he was dropped and had to fight his way back. He was bowling well amidst that injury. So, it only requires proving his fitness to make a come back which has already done.
Sidhoni Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Doesn't apply to everyone though. Dhoni keeps whoever he likes and drops whoever he likes. To whom it didn't apply? Even Yuvi had to do that being one of our best LOI players. I am talking about long periods, close to one full season.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now