fineleg Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 Clear winner... And HS is supposed to be our "main spinner" in ODIs? Link to comment
beetle Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 Bhajji is extremely overrated.... Link to comment
fineleg Posted October 14, 2007 Author Share Posted October 14, 2007 Bhajji is extremely overrated.... Make that extremely, extremely overrated. Considering Brad Hogg bowls quite well, I think hogg is quite underrated. Link to comment
Chaos Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 dude hstbhsjsn or sny indisn spinner sucks now. hogg is tooo goood. Link to comment
fineleg Posted October 14, 2007 Author Share Posted October 14, 2007 dude hstbhsjsn or sny indisn spinner sucks now. hogg is tooo goood. Time to find a new spinner - atleast try to groom and try Chawla, Pragyan Ojha, others Bhajji has proved himself over many series, that he cannot take wickets in ODIs. Bhajji can be a containing option, not a wicket taking option. Link to comment
Yuvraj4Captaincy Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 hogg is oz..obviously he is better...almsot every oz player is better than indian player..maybe not on paper but they r...look at the average of all oz batters too..insane...and ther fielding is #1...bowling up there too....wha a team.....be in awe or feel jealous..its up to u Link to comment
gs Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 Bhajji bowled ok today but for most part in the recent past, he's been a sack of sh.it Link to comment
MundaPakistani Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 As i have said many times before that B Hogg is THE most underrated ODI bowler in the world. Link to comment
living Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 I like Murli K better than Bhajji for ODI's. I repeat play Sehwag as bowler ...... Its worth a shot considering how bad our ODI team is. We need to try something new!! Link to comment
Cricketics Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 i don't think that brad hogg is still under rated for ppl.. those atleast who are watching odi cricket consistently like me would definately praise this guy's bowling.. he is excellent for aus.. but gotta say one hing, aussie fielding is superv, he is backed by some excellent aussie fielding.. where our Indian team failz to provide good decent fielding to our spinners.. Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
The Outsider Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 trust some people to try and obfuscate issues by mixing ODIs and Tests Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Chandan Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 Anyway forget ODIs. I want to know the top 5-6 wicket takers for India in TESTS. Can you provide the stats BB. Number 1 is Kumble, 2 is Kapil. But after that?? Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
fineleg Posted October 15, 2007 Author Share Posted October 15, 2007 Anyway forget ODIs. I want to know the top 5-6 wicket takers for India in TESTS. Can you provide the stats BB. Number 1 is Kumble, 2 is Kapil. But after that?? Chandan, 1. Kumble - 566 2. Kapil Dev - 434 #3 is B.S. Bedi - 266 #4 B.S. Chandrasekhar - 242 #5 Harbhajan Singh - 238 #6 J Srinath - 236 Link to comment
Chandan Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 God!! Not even 300 from anyone after that?? So is this any surprise why we don't win enough matches?? I dearly want any of the current fast bowlers to reach 200+ but it seems it is too wishful. And by the time we'll have a pace bowler to take those many wickets, spinners would have vanished!! It is such a frustrating condition! PS: Among the 90+ wicket takers, the best SR is that of Pathan?? Will the surprises ever end?? Best SR in TESTS for Pathan?? Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Chandan Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 Australia and Pak have had two-three such bowlers in their ranks at one time, isn't it? Is it a wonder that they did so much better than Indians at one point and in former's case all the time?? I don't think Zahher Khan would reach 230 even. It is such a sad state here in India. It depresses me. We just blew a golden age of batting, which I don't think India will have again in near future, without winning a number of tests because of lack of bowlers! Link to comment
fineleg Posted October 15, 2007 Author Share Posted October 15, 2007 Australia and Pak have had two-three such bowlers in their ranks at one time, isn't it? Is it a wonder that they did so much better than Indians at one point and in former's case all the time?? I don't think Zahher Khan would reach 230 even. It is such a sad state here in India. It depresses me. We just blew a golden age of batting, which I don't think India will have again in near future, without winning a number of tests because of lack of bowlers! Certainly depressing. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now