Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Lot of ppl supporting Modi cuz he is not from congress.. Just like it happened with Obama after Bush juniors 8 years.. Then there are some anti-secular folks who don't like to see the way likes of Mulayam Singh operates or appease minorities. Then there are some who thinks riots of 2002 was right way to handle.. Then there are few who are straight anti-minority Then there are some business communities who liked the way Modi made progress in Gujarat
Forgot to count those who just hate Congress and want to see their end.
Posted
@S=G so who would you have? Advani? Chauhan?
LK Advani, Sushma Swaraj or Arun Jaitley. As for Chouhan - he is not yet ready for the top post but if BJP does form the next Govt (which they most probably will) then I would like to see him in a big National role.
Posted
if we can put these corruption claims aside, then I would pick anyone who can converse and communicate properly. May be Jaitley, May be Parrikar. May be Shivraj Singh Chauhan. I think all the possible PM candidates, Modi, Rahul, Kejru, Mulayam, Mamta - all are vey poor communicators in terms of putting your point across. Of course BJP cant afford it, they need votes on the Modi wave. He needs to learn to be less funny in his talks though. its not ICF. Its India to run :hysterical:
Are you kidding me? Modi is among the best speakers.. His English is weak but in Hindi n Gujarati he is da best.
Posted
Lot of ppl supporting Modi cuz he is not from congress.. Just like it happened with Obama after Bush juniors 8 years.. Then there are some anti-secular folks who don't like to see the way likes of Mulayam Singh operates or appease minorities. Then there are some who thinks riots of 2002 was right way to handle.. Then there are few who are straight anti-minority Then there are some business communities who liked the way Modi made progress in Gujarat
That is how all elections work. if you completely screw up the country when you are in power you will have to face the repercussions. Naturally opposition will benefit from it. Much like how AIADMK and DMK enjoyed benefit of corruption from each other. It is always about picking the lesser evil while punishing the non performing government.
Posted
if we can put these corruption claims aside' date=' [b']then I would pick anyone who can converse and communicate properly. May be Jaitley, May be Parrikar. May be Shivraj Singh Chauhan. I think all the possible PM candidates, Modi, Rahul, Kejru, Mulayam, Mamta - all are vey poor communicators in terms of putting your point across. Of course BJP cant afford it, they need votes on the Modi wave. He needs to learn to be less funny in his talks though. its not ICF. Its India to run :hysterical:
lol.
Posted
if we can put these corruption claims aside, then I would pick anyone who can converse and communicate properly. May be Jaitley, May be Parrikar. May be Shivraj Singh Chauhan. I think all the possible PM candidates, Modi, Rahul, Kejru, Mulayam, Mamta - all are vey poor communicators in terms of putting your point across. Of course BJP cant afford it, they need votes on the Modi wave. He needs to learn to be less funny in his talks though. its not ICF. Its India to run :hysterical:
Jaitley has not even fought a lok sabha election till now and last i checked he is involved in a close fight with captain Amrinder. He does not have a base. BJP already went down this road with Advani. A sindhi with no base to call his own apart from pan hinduism. It did not work out. I have seen Chauhan speak. He is no orator. Modi has given rallies in Marathi for example. I doubt Chauhan has that ability to connect. Parrikar again, small state and no base.
Posted
Are you kidding me? Modi is among the best speakers.. His English is weak but in Hindi n Gujarati he is da best.
I agree and listening to him over the years, you can pick the point if you ignore the rhetoric. But you need time to understand him. Anybody who is listening to him for the first time will dismiss him as a cheap guy pulling rhetorics on his opposition.
Posted
LK Advani' date=' Sushma Swaraj or Arun Jaitley. As for Chouhan - he is not yet ready for the top post but if BJP does form the next Govt (which they most probably will) then I would like to see him in a big National role.[/quote'] an ageing sindhi and two upper castes. Like it or not the BJP will have to tap into the OBC vote bank in a big way. India has changed since the time of Atal Bihari. Its either Chouhan or Modi. Two strong OBC leaders.
Posted
lol.
I believe its not that funny. when you are a PM. You have a team under you. You have to be a decision maker. Not really a thinker to get ideas. Ideas can come from your team. you being able to effectively communicate with your team and your countrymen and outside is a HUGE plus. Huge. thats why doctors who communicate well as more successful.
Posted
an ageing sindhi and two upper castes. Like it or not the BJP will have to tap into the OBC vote bank in a big way. India has changed since the time of Atal Bihari. Its either Chouhan or Modi. Two strong OBC leaders.
I'm talking about the Prime Minister, not the Leader of the Election Campaign.
Posted
Jaitley has not even fought a lok sabha election till now and last i checked he is involved in a close fight with captain Amrinder. He does not have a base. BJP already went down this road with Advani. A sindhi with no base to call his own apart from pan hinduism. It did not work out. I have seen Chauhan speak. He is no orator. Modi has given rallies in Marathi for example. I doubt Chauhan has that ability to connect. Parrikar again, small state and no base.
BJP is a unique case because of them being insignificant in the South. they need the Modi wave. Had BJP been sure to get a simple majority, how would it matter if Jaitley or Parrikar had no base. Of course we dont know the intricacies of the parties. decisions would be based on that too
Posted
Polarization is the key word. BJP played its card perfectly. Any other choice of candidate would have strategical disaster.
you insult me or somebody who votes for BJP, saying that we have been polarised as Hindus? unless you realise not everybody does it. may be the uneducated:winky:
Posted
I'm talking about the Prime Minister' date= not the Leader of the Election Campaign.
its the same thing.....the OBC's are not going to forget it if you betray them and dont install a candidate they effectively voted for.
Posted
you insult me or somebody who votes for BJP' date=' saying that we have been polarised as Hindus? unless you realise not everybody does it. may be the uneducated:winky:[/quote'] I don't mean polarisation purely based on religion. Also Modi has been in the news for a while. He has already developed an image like the public know him already very well. After all these years you come up with a new candidate you would have to start from the scratch again.
Posted
BJP is a unique case because of them being insignificant in the South. they need the Modi wave. Had BJP been sure to get a simple majority, how would it matter if Jaitley or Parrikar had no base. Of course we dont know the intricacies of the parties. decisions would be based on that too
so you answered your own question. Why is there a modi wave? The masses like him. Give the masses what they want. PArrikar for eg has only recently become CM again. Prior to that he bungled the entire campaign and lost out to some weak congress candidates
Posted

I cannot fathom any other could have driven this much passion among south Indian voters like Modi did. I am saying based on my facebook interactions. There is overwhelming support for him there. Only mistake they have done there is they should have fought there alone.

Posted
I cannot fathom any other could have driven this much passion among south Indian voters like Modi did. I am saying based on my facebook interactions. There is overwhelming support for him there. Only mistake they have done there is they should have fought there alone.
Where TN? I guess captain is ok...
Posted
I cannot fathom any other could have driven this much passion among south Indian voters like Modi did. I am saying based on my facebook interactions. There is overwhelming support for him there. Only mistake they have done there is they should have fought there alone.
nope in TN they were right to forge a third alliance. In AP i sort of agree they should have fought alone. TRS, Jagan and TDP are all ready to support government. But the BJP top brass have thought that its better to form an alliance with TDP to block the congress from getting any seats in Telangana. The BJP atm in Andhra is set out to deny the congress seats and hopefully ask for support from the remaining three parties. If they can keep the congress to 5-7 seats and win 2-3 seats themselves. Some 33 seats effectively become their allies in forming government. Karnataka and Kerela they are fighting on their own.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...