CoverDrive Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 Share of revenue is fine but the proposals to scrap FTP and making Eng, Aus and Ind immune to relegation in the two tier system is bad. Cricket or any game will be worse off if there is preferential treatment on the field and for performance
kubrickian Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 If 80 % of revenue comes from India, BCCI definitely deserves a higher share in revenue and we have the biggest population among all these countries where infrastructure has to be improved and cricket should be spread. You have empty stadiums for test matches in South Africa, West Indies, Sri Lanka and they don't even play any cricket in Pakistan. How can these boards oppose BCCI getting more revenue ? Cricket is surviving in these countries only because of revenue generated from India.
MCcricket Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 Sreeni has had his revenge, Lograt is sulking and more so CSA, morally doesn't seem right but purely based on logic it is, and Bcci is one of the parties along with CA, ECB
cowboysfan Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 BCCI had very good relations with CSA before lorgat came along,they signed a death sentence when they elected him president.
adi B Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 332 crores to 5000 crores BCCI eyes Rs 5000 crore chunk from ICC pie thats a valid point though,heck i say "yes" but i do not support the 2 tier system in tests
cowboysfan Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 WICB will oppose this deal,i hope they dont change their mind because this power grab is dead without their vote.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now