Jump to content

Lets all laugh at Bangladesh..


Recommended Posts

Posted
14 years of test cricket and still a minnow. Lost against Lungans by an innings and 248 runs :hehe::hehe::hehe: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
How about we laugh at your auss? Throwing stones from your glass house! What has your team done lately and India is not even considered a minnow!!
Posted
at least we prepared a pacey pitch at home!!! take that india!!!
:hatsoff: The pitch really had some pace and bounce. Bangla bowling wasn't discipline enough to apply the pressure for SL batsmen early on, then after SL ran away with it and their fielders starting to drop catches the bowling has lost it's venom even more as u would expect and that gave the impression the pitch was slow and flat. But it was a sporty pitch :agree:
Posted

Its depressing to see no real improvement in the bangladeshi team after all these year and that too with a cricket mad population and its not like they are denied a big chunk of ICC money either,they should not be losing so badly at home.

Posted
It is not India's years but british india's years. Even present day India started playing only from Nov 1947' date=' so if you want to add the [b']10 matches played by british india from 1932-1936, followed by a 10 year break for world war 2, followed by 3 matches in 1946 to our tally then you have to add it to yours too. And please check how many pakistani players from present day pakistan's first match in 1952 were a part of British India's national and provincial teams. All of them, they had to be. So why do only present day India's players from 1947 get to carry the record from 1932 to 1946 and not pakistani players? Why should only pakistan get a clean start?
So you have problem over 13 matches? Only captain Kardar and one other player from Pakistan's first test eleven previously played for India. Other 9 were making their test debut.
Posted
Its depressing to see no real improvement in the bangladeshi team after all these year and that too with a cricket mad population and its not like they are denied a big chunk of ICC money either' date='they should not be losing so badly at home.[/quote'] They made 100 run improvement. 10 years ago they used to get out around 150. Now they make little over 200.
Posted
How did you count the years for other countries that started playing after world war 2? Wouldn't the right thing be to subtract those war years for all affected countries or present a different stat for countries uninterrupted by war, instead of mixing up the stats from countries that started playing before and after the war. And since you want to add 1932 to 1947 to India's years, going by the same logic you should add the same number of years to pakistan too. Maybe you can also add 1932 to 1971 to bangladesh since it was a part of united india and pakistan and those 2 nations were cricket playing nations during that time period.
Because they were played under India? They weren't played as Pakistan or Bangladesh. It is a stat here and there by matches I don't know why you are taking it like I'm attack India. Why should India get special provisions on a stat, that would make the stat more biased and unreliable. Literally NZ, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have worse records and you are complaining about bias against India. They played under India, it counts as India. If I discount it then I should discount Australia till 1901, South Africa till 1934, West Indies to every single nation there gained independence and every other damn country. See how stupid that is, it is literally a stat by matches I've shown as well because the years were unreliable.
Posted
:hatsoff: The pitch really had some pace and bounce. Bangla bowling wasn't discipline enough to apply the pressure for SL batsmen early on' date=' then after SL ran away with it and their fielders starting to drop catches the bowling has lost it's venom even more as u would expect and that gave the impression the pitch was slow and flat. But it was a sporty pitch :agree:[/quote'] dude, spinning pitch is our only hope!!! or maybe we can create an actual 700 run pitch!
Posted
So you have problem over 13 matches? Only captain Kardar and one other player from Pakistan's first test eleven previously played for India. Other 9 were making their test debut.
the issue is over the number of yrs where india was not independent n pak was part of india, so pak team was being represented as indian team. You could very well have had 11pak players playing from india if they were good enough
Posted

was about to LOL so hard but then i just realized that we are getting our own butts kicked around the park by the same team that just got white washed by these bangla tigers ... smh :(( let's laugh at our own misery before laughing at others

Posted
was about to LOL so hard but then i just realized that we are getting our own butts kicked around the park by the same team that just got white washed by these bangla tigers ... smh :(( let's laugh at our own misery before laughing at others
its sports laugh out at others when you are not doing well and gloat when you are its win win :two_thumbs_up:
Posted
Bangladesh is the most populous country in the world never to have won an Olympic medal.
Olympics are dominated by US, China, and Russia. Rest of the countries are joke when it comes to Olympics. Your statement is completely idiotic.
Posted
dude' date=' spinning pitch is our only hope!!! or maybe we can create an actual 700 run pitch![/quote'] BD's main strength isn't Test, everyone knows that. Test cricket is the most boring sport I have ever seen. Rubel Hossain avg 80 in test lets laugh at that hahah.
Posted
14 years of test cricket and still a minnow. Lost against Lungans by an innings and 248 runs :hehe::hehe::hehe: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
You have really nice legs, are you sissy or something?
Posted

That opener dismissed cheaply one more time.:hehe: Without kohli, india would have been even more poor. imagine raina or jadeja batting at no. 3. Aur (fast)bowling to abysmal hai hi

Posted

The other big problem with Bangladesh cricket has been is that they always play very young sides with an average age in the early twenties. What's happening to middle-aged players? You can understand this trend in SC fast bowlers but for batsmen it's strange. You need age-wise matured cricketers for test cricket, too many youngsters doesn't work regardless of how many matches they played.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...