Jump to content

MS Dhoni guilty of corrupt conduct, gave false statement in IPL case: prosecution


CG

Recommended Posts

Posted
this should be a lesson to future cricketers-dont get involved with BCCI babus' date='they are nothing but trouble.[/quote'] True,If srini goes down he will take dhoni down with him.
Posted
I trust dhoni. I'll be extremely surprised if the "corrupt conduct" goes beyond lying to save meiyappan.
I hope he is not. It is very clear to me that he tried to save Meiyappan which is a crime in itself. But that can be excused if he is not involved in corruption himself.
Posted
I hope he is not. It is very clear to me that he tried to save Meiyappan which is a crime in itself. But that can be excused if he is not involved in corruption himself.
Even Hussey was forced to retract his statement about meiyappan. I am sure dhoni was pressurized into making such statements by srinivasan.
Posted
Even Hussey was forced to retract his statement about meiyappan. I am sure dhoni was pressurized into making such statements by srinivasan.
I hope you realize the difference between lying to the media and to a SC appointed committee, possibly under oath.
Posted
this should be a lesson to future cricketers-dont get involved with BCCI babus' date='they are nothing but trouble.[/quote'] As if he had a choice. So the board President buys a team and then buys him as the team's captain. What option would any player in the world have in such a situation? Say, please don't buy me, I don't want to be involved with you? The BCCI President shouldn't have been allowed to buy a team in the first place and all this could have been avoided
Posted
Even Hussey was forced to retract his statement about meiyappan. I am sure dhoni was pressurized into making such statements by srinivasan.
That is not an excuse for lying before an Supreme court appointed committee. He can be prosecuted for contempt of court if there is enough evidence that he deliberately tried to save Meiyappan. Fortunately for him it seems there is no concrete evidence and also that's not in the prime focus now.
Posted

The first thing Srini did when he came into Power for BCCI was change the constitution in which he removed the conflict of interest clause so he can merrily go about buying CSK, running India Cements and BCCI

Posted

According to Amarnath Dhoni was saved by Srini when he was sacked from captaincy after the Australia tour by the selectors. So I guess he had to return the favor.

Posted
The first thing Srini did when he came into Power for BCCI was change the constitution in which he removed the conflict of interest clause so he can merrily go about buying CSK' date=' running India Cements and BCCI[/quote'] The BCCI voted to amend the constitution which Srinivasan was a part of. Lets not turn from the issues of the organisation to one individual. Jaitley, Shukla and Pawar - all may be involved.
Posted
According to Amarnath Dhoni was saved by Srini when he was sacked from captaincy after the Australia tour by the selectors. So I guess he had to return the favor.
In that case, he is a fool. The argument that he did is to save his employers is vacuous. If there is a probe against your employer and you lie to the courts in process of that probe, you cannot get away with saying that you were following the official company line. Doing so in the media or other interactions is different from doing it as part of a criminal investigation. You are opening yourself up to serious charges like perjury and obstruction of justice.
Posted
NKP Salve served as cabinet minister in the Rajiv Gandhi government. :--D He's the common denominator for Reliance, Vodafone and 10 other corporate big wigs. Another trivia - he was also the legal counsel for the "poor" Nigerian women in the Somnath Bharti Khidkee incident case.
He is biggest and most expensive lawyer of the India at the moment and probably un-arguably so. No wonder he is involved in this high profile case. He was also representing Italian Marines in that homicide case. But, later declared he won't represent them because of Italian governments refusal to send them back to India.
Posted
Harish Salve ‏@hsalve 18m I have admired Dhoni's skills on the field. However possibly by error of judgment he not only took a job as Vice President in Ind Cement 1/2
Harish Salve ‏@hsalve 16m but he appeared before Mudgal comm (with Srini) and asserted that meiyapan had no connection with CSK. A cover up to save M is corruption
Harish Salve ‏@hsalve 15m as defined in the relevant regulations. That was my submission in the SC. Also that I can't believe that capt of CSK didn't know M's role.
Posted
Speculation on this thread is lol worthy
Says the guy who was asking ICF to censor Dhoni being called corrupt. Guess what he has been called corrupt in the highest court of the country. Whether he is or not, will come out in due time, but please go ahead and have the court records struck out where Dhoni was called corrupt.
Posted
In that case' date=' he is a fool. The argument that he did is to save his employers is vacuous. If there is a probe against your employer and you lie to the courts in process of that probe, you cannot get away with saying that you were following the official company line. Doing so in the media or other interactions is different from doing it as part of a criminal investigation. You are opening yourself up to serious charges like perjury and obstruction of justice.[/quote'] I find it surprising that people on the Internet are even making an argument for Dhoni that his statement was under duress! One needs to specify why/how was he under duress. Just saying "Under Duress! Under Duress!" has no meaning.
Posted
Says the guy who was asking ICF to censor Dhoni being called corrupt. Guess what he has been called corrupt in the highest court of the country. Whether he is or not' date=' will come out in due time, but please go ahead and have the court records struck out where Dhoni was called corrupt.[/quote'] I care hoots about that,was just trying to point out inconsistencies in moderation with that post
Posted
I hope you realize the difference between lying to the media and to a SC appointed committee' date=' possibly under oath.[/quote'] I get it. Legally one's a crime and the other isn't. But in my eyes both of them lied under some form of duress, hopefully. That's what i was pointing out, what their lies meant to the trust i placed in the two players, not the legal implications of their words.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...