Jump to content

Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, speedracer said:

But Mark Wood is very good and is much better than all trundlers in the world. 

 

Can you imagine a guy like boobi, harshal thakor, thukka chuulkas destroy pak in pak on flat patta breads like Mark Wood did? 

 

I dont think so. 

Guy has very low understanding about cricket,its all about stats accumulated over the years in bilaterals against lowly attacks, he's all ears and eyes

Posted
5 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Guy has very low understanding about cricket,its all about stats accumulated over the years in bilaterals against lowly attacks, he's all ears and eyes

Most kohli fans seem to be very douchey. Arrogant. Very pedantic. No out of the box thinking. Rigid mentality. 

 

Confirmation bias at its finest. They only want to hear what they want to hear to support their misinformed theories. 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, Suhaan said:

If you are someone who glorify dud cricketers then everything is dud for you

Don't be our kind,stay away

Which dud cricketer did I glorify? lol
I don't even glorify guys like Umran and Prasidh, it's your job of glorifying every other 2 kaudi ka talent

Posted
6 hours ago, speedracer said:

But Mark Wood is very good and is much better than all trundlers in the world. 

 

Can you imagine a guy like boobi, harshal thakor, thukka chuulkas destroy pak in pak on flat patta breads like Mark Wood did? 

 

I dont think so. 

What is Mark wood's test and Odi averages? Simple question

Posted
6 hours ago, speedracer said:

Most kohli fans seem to be very douchey. Arrogant. Very pedantic. No out of the box thinking. Rigid mentality. 

 

Confirmation bias at its finest. They only want to hear what they want to hear to support their misinformed theories. 

 

I don't cater to IPL superstars , if that's what you mean then I am guilty.
 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Adamant said:

What is Mark wood's test and Odi averages? Simple question

Average isn't everything. Otherwise philtrundler would be a goat bowler and we all know he is a halwa stat padding can who is beyond trash in Asia. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Adamant said:

I don't cater to IPL superstars , if that's what you mean then I am guilty.
 

Are you seriously telling me some of the trundlers you mentioned earlier are better than woody in tests? 

Posted
6 hours ago, express bowling said:

I criticize Bhuvi and Chahar because they are one dimensional pacers who look good only when the ball swings ( for a few overs upfront ) .  The moment the ball stops swinging, they look innocuous. They will always be low ceiling bowlers. 

That's right but you got to analyse performance of bowlers rationally.
Umran's eco is something which will toruble use a lot on importannt days, I only said he needs to work on that especially those wide line.

Posted
3 minutes ago, speedracer said:

Average isn't everything. Otherwise philtrundler would be a goat bowler and we all know he is a halwa stat padding can who is beyond trash in Asia. 

Philander is the baap of Mark Wood.
That's the problem with people like you and Suhaan , everything is based on speed for you guys.
If you check Philander's record it's way more well rounded than Wood and let's not even compare their impact on test teams success

Posted
4 minutes ago, speedracer said:

Are you seriously telling me some of the trundlers you mentioned earlier are better than woody in tests? 

Which trundlers are you talking about?, if it's Chahar and Bhuvi then I never said that.
Wood is mediocre though.

Posted

The thing with these guys who analyse fast bowlers wholly on basis of performance in Asia is that they are the first ones to big up Virender Sehwag , despite his night watchman kinda stats in three out of four SENA countries.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Which trundlers are you talking about?, if it's Chahar and Bhuvi then I never said that.
Wood is mediocre though.

Yes talking about those 2 etc. And in odi wood is better.

Posted

Anyone who rates Wood over Philander in tests, is basically nothing more than a speed hound who knows nothing about actual fast bowling.No clue at all.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Adamant said:

The thing with these guys who analyse fast bowlers wholly on basis of performance in Asia is that they are the first ones to big up Virender Sehwag , despite his night watchman kinda stats in three out of four SENA countries.

I sont rate Sehwag outside Asia and Australia. He sucks vs swing. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Philander is the baap of Mark Wood.
That's the problem with people like you and Suhaan , everything is based on speed for you guys.
If you check Philander's record it's way more well rounded than Wood and let's not even compare their impact on test teams success

Check phitruldners record in India and Lanka. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Anyone who rates Wood over Philander in tests, is basically nothing more than a speed hound who knows nothing about actual fast bowling.No clue at all.

Not comparing h2h with philander. 

Philander would be a goat bowler I'd you judge him by stats. But he is far from it. He stat pads in sena. He thoroughly sucks in Asia. One dimensional can is what he is. 

 

On a lifeless pitch I would pick wood over a proper trundler like philtrundler. 

Posted
Just now, speedracer said:

Check phitruldners record in India and Lanka. 

Again, what about countries apart from this, why didn't you mention UAE or Australia?
Wood averages 40+ in England, a country suited to pace bowling, what do you make of it?

Posted
Just now, Adamant said:

Again, what about countries apart from this, why didn't you mention UAE or Australia?
Wood averages 40+ in England, a country suited to pace bowling, what do you make of it?

He averages 25 in Australia. 

In England the surface doesn't t suit him. He isn't a trundler like phiktrundler. Only swing trundlers do well in England and nz. 

But we all saw how good other bowlers of englund did in Australia and India. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Again, what about countries apart from this, why didn't you mention UAE or Australia?
Wood averages 40+ in England, a country suited to pace bowling, what do you make of it?

Btw wood averages 13 in SA loool.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...