sourab10forever Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Gambhir for Dhawan???????????? and pankaj in for Binny???? or ashwin in for Binny?????? Rohit Sharma in for binny???????????
Pagalpanti Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Aaron for Binny, Aaron at least has a decent technique like Bhuvy to survive with top order bat. Would still persist with Dhawan for 1 more test.
India-KXIP fan Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Rohit for Binny Aaron for Bhuvi Lets see how Ishant ends up this match before making decision on Pandey/Pankaj.
Pagalpanti Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Rohit for Binny Aaron for Bhuvi Lets see how Ishant ends up this match before making decision on Pandey/Pankaj. Extra bat? Even with 3.75 bowlers we're struggling to get more than 1 wicket atm (credit to Cook's form for that).
Gunner Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Aaron in for Bunny. There's a serious lack of pace in our bowling attack and Varun's the only one in the squad who can fill that void. Pankaz in for Ishant Pandey in for Bhuvan
Lord Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 depends on the track.if its similar to this one,then Ashwin for Binny.rest same. would ideally select Pankaj for Ishant but thats not gonna happen
India-KXIP fan Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Extra bat? Even with 3.75 bowlers we're struggling to get more than 1 wicket atm (credit to Cook's form for that). 99 days out of a 100 India would have been allout 350 if you rewind back to yesterday. Rohit is probably as effective a bowler as Binny too :cantstop: He is the only batmsan in squad and deserves at least this series before axe.
Lord Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 99 days out of a 100 India would have been allout 350 if you rewind back to yesterday. Rohit is probably as effective a bowler as Binny too :cantstop: how would Rohit change that.he was pathetic in both SA and NZ.
Sachin=GOD Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Wait for the match to finish before playing selector-selector.
Pagalpanti Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 99 days out of a 100 India would have been allout 350 if you rewind back to yesterday. Rohit is probably as effective a bowler as Binny too :cantstop: He is the only batmsan in squad and deserves at least this series before axe. Sure he deserves a shot after 3rd/4th test if Rahane keeps failing but if we change back to the combination of 7-4, we're not even giving ourselves a chance to win a test.
India-KXIP fan Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Sure he deserves a shot after 3rd/4th test if Rahane keeps failing but if we change back to the combination of 7-4' date=' we're not even giving ourselves a chance to win a test.[/quote'] 7-4 > 6-4 if you know what I mean I suppose Ash is a possibility.
India-KXIP fan Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 how would Rohit change that.he was pathetic in both SA and NZ. He wasn't pathetic in NZ, decent. Top scorer in 1st innings, undefeated in last. Average 40 from 4 innings. Decent. But deserves more than 4 tests overseas. Vijay, Rahane were written off too at 1 stage. And don't consider ODI's, in that case Vijay was terrible last time India toured SA in 2010.
Lord Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 He wasn't pathetic in NZ' date=' decent. Top scorer in 1st innings, undefeated in last. Average 40 from 4 innings. Decent. But deserves more than 4 tests overseas. Vijay, Rahane were written off too at 1 stage. And don't consider ODI's, in that case Vijay was terrible last time India toured SA in 2010.[/quote'] just one good innings.the 31 was when match was over. If we have to give more chances,why not try 5 bowlers for a while.why discard after one match when 4 bowler strategy has never worked Vijay was dropped rightly and has been better in his comeback.Rahane did well in both SA and NZ.Completely different scenarios
sourab10forever Posted July 11, 2014 Author Posted July 11, 2014 So... I would say Vijay Gambhir Pujara Rohit Kholi Dhoni Jadeja Ashwin Bhuvi Shami Ishant/pankaj/pandey Right???????????:bow::bow::bow::bow:
India-KXIP fan Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 just one good innings.the 31 was when match was over. If we have to give more chances,why not try 5 bowlers for a while.why discard after one match when 4 bowler strategy has never worked Vijay was dropped rightly and has been better in his comeback.Rahane did well in both SA and NZ.Completely different scenarios Rahane was poor in previous A tours, had 1 solid innings this A tour though and was also struggling against Joginder Sharma in SRT's farewell (why he was written off, he is class though as we saw). But anyways India is too vulnerable with current batting. Imagine if score was 350 instead of 450... this match was most likely lost. Dhoni is not a No.6, Jaddu is not a No.7...weakest Indian batting lineup in decades. Not the way to go, luck won't save India everytime in 5 test series. Lack of depth will be exposed and may just cost the series. Binny is not a bowler btw, he is not batter either. Binny is a fielder. Rohit is same at bowling as Binny. He just gives others a rest.
youngindia Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 If we have to give more chances,why not try 5 bowlers for a while.why discard after one match when 4 bowler strategy has never worked " 4 bowler strategy has never worked" is the imagination of mediocre posters with short term memory and no sense of history...there is a mountain of historical if not recent evidence otherwise and because batsmen are our precious asset and our matchwinners. dhoni at no 6 outside asia is absurd with his technique. the '5 bowlers" is not going to fetch us 20 wickets or accomplish anything.
rkt.india Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 " 4 bowler strategy has never worked" is the imagination of mediocre posters with short term memory and no sense of history...there is a mountain of historical if not recent evidence otherwise and because batsmen are our precious asset and our matchwinners. dhoni at no 6 outside asia is absurd with his technique. the '5 bowlers" is not going to fetch us 20 wickets or accomplish anything. whats the use of playing a 5th bowler if he is not good enough even to be a 10th bowler. If he was that good, he would have already been playing in top 4 bowlers.
Lord Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 Rahane was poor in previous A tours, had 1 solid innings this A tour though and was also struggling against Joginder Sharma in SRT's farewell (why he was written off, he is class though as we saw). But anyways India is too vulnerable with current batting. Imagine if score was 350 instead of 450... this match was most likely lost. Dhoni is not a No.6, Jaddu is not a No.7...weakest Indian batting lineup in decades. Not the way to go, luck won't save India everytime in 5 test series. Lack of depth will be exposed and may just cost the series. Binny is not a bowler btw, he is not batter either. Binny is a fielder. Rohit is same at bowling as Binny. He just gives others a rest. The score was less because all 3 of Kohli,Pujara and Rahane failed.That too won't happen everytime. By 5 bowlers,I meant Ashwin for these kind of tracks.He can do well here and is a decent batsman too.I still think Binny can do a job of 5th bowler on seamer friendly tracks.Here even Shami is struggling.so can expect nothing from Binny. Simply put we need to try 5 bowler strategy for a while as 4 bowlers hasnt worked at all.This may be weak batting lineup but it'll remain weak with Rohit in.Its not like we are leaving out a great and have a lot to lose by omitting Rohit.We have to see how this tradeoff works for a while
Straight Drive Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 6 + 5 for me for the next test. Should get in another pacer or spin bowler depending on the wicket. If it's as dead as this then better to get a spinner.
bihutoli Posted July 11, 2014 Posted July 11, 2014 I would get Ashwin in for Binny. Thats the only change I'll make. We'll anyways need to bowl a lot of overs, and crap as Ashwin is overseas, he'll be more threatening than Binny. Plus a better batsman.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now