Jump to content

Changes for 2nd test


Recommended Posts

Posted
Rohit for Binny Aaron for Bhuvi Lets see how Ishant ends up this match before making decision on Pandey/Pankaj.
Extra bat? :laugh: Even with 3.75 bowlers we're struggling to get more than 1 wicket atm (credit to Cook's form for that).
Posted

Aaron in for Bunny. There's a serious lack of pace in our bowling attack and Varun's the only one in the squad who can fill that void. Pankaz in for Ishant Pandey in for Bhuvan

Posted

depends on the track.if its similar to this one,then Ashwin for Binny.rest same. would ideally select Pankaj for Ishant but thats not gonna happen

Posted
Extra bat? :laugh: Even with 3.75 bowlers we're struggling to get more than 1 wicket atm (credit to Cook's form for that).
99 days out of a 100 India would have been allout 350 if you rewind back to yesterday. Rohit is probably as effective a bowler as Binny too :cantstop: He is the only batmsan in squad and deserves at least this series before axe.
Posted
99 days out of a 100 India would have been allout 350 if you rewind back to yesterday. Rohit is probably as effective a bowler as Binny too :cantstop:
how would Rohit change that.he was pathetic in both SA and NZ.
Posted
99 days out of a 100 India would have been allout 350 if you rewind back to yesterday. Rohit is probably as effective a bowler as Binny too :cantstop: He is the only batmsan in squad and deserves at least this series before axe.
Sure he deserves a shot after 3rd/4th test if Rahane keeps failing but if we change back to the combination of 7-4, we're not even giving ourselves a chance to win a test.
Posted
Sure he deserves a shot after 3rd/4th test if Rahane keeps failing but if we change back to the combination of 7-4' date=' we're not even giving ourselves a chance to win a test.[/quote'] 7-4 > 6-4 if you know what I mean :rofl: I suppose Ash is a possibility.
Posted
how would Rohit change that.he was pathetic in both SA and NZ.
He wasn't pathetic in NZ, decent. Top scorer in 1st innings, undefeated in last. Average 40 from 4 innings. Decent. But deserves more than 4 tests overseas. Vijay, Rahane were written off too at 1 stage. And don't consider ODI's, in that case Vijay was terrible last time India toured SA in 2010.
Posted
He wasn't pathetic in NZ' date=' decent. Top scorer in 1st innings, undefeated in last. Average 40 from 4 innings. Decent. But deserves more than 4 tests overseas. Vijay, Rahane were written off too at 1 stage. And don't consider ODI's, in that case Vijay was terrible last time India toured SA in 2010.[/quote'] just one good innings.the 31 was when match was over. If we have to give more chances,why not try 5 bowlers for a while.why discard after one match when 4 bowler strategy has never worked Vijay was dropped rightly and has been better in his comeback.Rahane did well in both SA and NZ.Completely different scenarios
Posted
just one good innings.the 31 was when match was over. If we have to give more chances,why not try 5 bowlers for a while.why discard after one match when 4 bowler strategy has never worked Vijay was dropped rightly and has been better in his comeback.Rahane did well in both SA and NZ.Completely different scenarios
Rahane was poor in previous A tours, had 1 solid innings this A tour though and was also struggling against Joginder Sharma in SRT's farewell (why he was written off, he is class though as we saw). But anyways India is too vulnerable with current batting. Imagine if score was 350 instead of 450... this match was most likely lost. Dhoni is not a No.6, Jaddu is not a No.7...weakest Indian batting lineup in decades. Not the way to go, luck won't save India everytime in 5 test series. Lack of depth will be exposed and may just cost the series. Binny is not a bowler btw, he is not batter either. Binny is a fielder. Rohit is same at bowling as Binny. He just gives others a rest.
Posted
If we have to give more chances,why not try 5 bowlers for a while.why discard after one match when 4 bowler strategy has never worked
" 4 bowler strategy has never worked" is the imagination of mediocre posters with short term memory and no sense of history...there is a mountain of historical if not recent evidence otherwise and because batsmen are our precious asset and our matchwinners. dhoni at no 6 outside asia is absurd with his technique. the '5 bowlers" is not going to fetch us 20 wickets or accomplish anything.
Posted
" 4 bowler strategy has never worked" is the imagination of mediocre posters with short term memory and no sense of history...there is a mountain of historical if not recent evidence otherwise and because batsmen are our precious asset and our matchwinners. dhoni at no 6 outside asia is absurd with his technique. the '5 bowlers" is not going to fetch us 20 wickets or accomplish anything.
whats the use of playing a 5th bowler if he is not good enough even to be a 10th bowler. If he was that good, he would have already been playing in top 4 bowlers.
Posted
Rahane was poor in previous A tours, had 1 solid innings this A tour though and was also struggling against Joginder Sharma in SRT's farewell (why he was written off, he is class though as we saw). But anyways India is too vulnerable with current batting. Imagine if score was 350 instead of 450... this match was most likely lost. Dhoni is not a No.6, Jaddu is not a No.7...weakest Indian batting lineup in decades. Not the way to go, luck won't save India everytime in 5 test series. Lack of depth will be exposed and may just cost the series. Binny is not a bowler btw, he is not batter either. Binny is a fielder. Rohit is same at bowling as Binny. He just gives others a rest.
The score was less because all 3 of Kohli,Pujara and Rahane failed.That too won't happen everytime. By 5 bowlers,I meant Ashwin for these kind of tracks.He can do well here and is a decent batsman too.I still think Binny can do a job of 5th bowler on seamer friendly tracks.Here even Shami is struggling.so can expect nothing from Binny. Simply put we need to try 5 bowler strategy for a while as 4 bowlers hasnt worked at all.This may be weak batting lineup but it'll remain weak with Rohit in.Its not like we are leaving out a great and have a lot to lose by omitting Rohit.We have to see how this tradeoff works for a while
Posted

I would get Ashwin in for Binny. Thats the only change I'll make. We'll anyways need to bowl a lot of overs, and crap as Ashwin is overseas, he'll be more threatening than Binny. Plus a better batsman.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...