NareshK Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 In our entire test history in England, we played 52 tests before this tour and we managed to win a grand total of 5 test matches. That is 5 test wins since 1932. Did you expect this team which had no prior experience of playing in England to rout the England side one test after another ? Please get a reality check. Some people are acting as if we have always been a great side overseas and now just losing. Its simply not the case. Teams from SC have always struggled in Aus, Eng and SA. I think this team has lots of talent and have done superbly against all odds to win at Lord's. With more experience, I have confidence they will get even better and perform consistently overseas. Kohli, Pujara, Rahane have batted brilliantly in SA, NZ without much experience overseas which is never the case for batsmen from SC. Bhuvi got 18 wickets in his first tour of England. These are all good signs. We will have setbacks when we tour overseas but I think over time, we will improve and become a really good side.
G_B_ Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 times change with the money coming in there needs to be change more than the loss the manner of the loss which is hurting the most.
CSK Fan Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 In our entire test history in England, we played 52 tests before this tour and we managed to win a grand total of 5 test matches. That is 5 test wins since 1932. Did you expect this team which had no prior experience of playing in England to rout the England side one test after another ? Please get a reality check. Some people are acting as if we have always been a great side overseas and now just losing. Its simply not the case. Teams from SC have always struggled in Aus, Eng and SA. I think this team has lots of talent and have done superbly against all odds to win at Lord's. With more experience, I have confidence they will get even better and perform consistently overseas. Kohli, Pujara, Rahane have batted brilliantly in SA, NZ without much experience overseas which is never the case for batsmen from SC. Bhuvi got 18 wickets in his first tour of England. These are all good signs. We will have setbacks when we tour overseas but I think over time, we will improve and become a really good side. 1) Why don't you look at England's recent records too? England also was at it's most weakest 2) Most of India's wins have come in the last decade, where we have been on an upward swing 3) We may lose or not, but it is the lack of the effort and basics which hurt more. Along with lack of hunger. If they had given their best and lost not one person would complain about the young team I agree completely to the positives. But it is no co-incidence all of those positives including Bhuvi's performance happened in the first couple of matches, Dhoni couldn't keep the team motivated, there was no plan to have enough bowlers in the squad to rotate them I completely agree with the talent and future prospects of Pujara, Kohli, Rahane as well as Umesh, Aaron and Bhuvi. We will be on track soon.
NareshK Posted August 16, 2014 Author Posted August 16, 2014 times change with the money coming in there needs to be change more than the loss the manner of the loss which is hurting the most. It has nothing to do with money. Money doesnt bring you results automatically. You need experience and have to develop skills over time and that comes through playing in alien conditions. Indian team which had Sachin, Dravid, Laxman, Ganguly, Sehwag, Zaheer Khan, Kumble, Harbhajan etc. only managed to win 2 tests in England. This side has already won 1 test and that too in conditions which are heavily favorable to home side. In fact in this whole series, conditions have been doctored heavily in favor of England.
CSK Fan Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Surely we are playing like minnows. Even Zimbabwe will not lay down to die like this, dropping catches, gifting wickets
CSK Fan Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 It has nothing to do with money. Money doesnt bring you results automatically. You need experience and have to develop skills over time and that comes through playing in alien conditions. Indian team which had Sachin, Dravid, Laxman, Ganguly, Sehwag, Zaheer Khan, Kumble, Harbhajan etc. only managed to win 2 tests in England. This side has already won 1 test and that too in conditions which are heavily favorable to home side. In fact in this whole series, conditions have been doctored heavily in favor of England. They only managed to win 2 but how many did they lose? Sachin has 10 matches in win draw and only 7 in loses in England. Out of those 7, 4 came in the last 4-0 whitewash under Dhoni at the end of his career. Before that, his record was only 3 loses, 2 wins and 8 draws. How many of those loses were by innings or within 3 days? As I said it is not the loses, but the manner of the loses
NareshK Posted August 16, 2014 Author Posted August 16, 2014 times change with the money coming in there needs to be change more than the loss the manner of the loss which is hurting the most. You have a short memory or lack of knowledge of cricket history. Indian team which had Sachin, Dravid, Ganguly etc got bowled out for 100 and 66 in a test match in South Africa in 96. We got whitewashed in Australia in 99 and never put up a fight, whitewashed in SA in 2006 and whitewashed in 2011 in Eng, Aus. Overseas losses are not uncommon for India.
G_B_ Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 You have a short memory or lack of knowledge of cricket history. Indian team which had Sachin' date=' Dravid, Ganguly etc got bowled out for 100 and 66 in a test match in South Africa once. This Indian side almost won a game at Joburg in their first tour of SA in seamer friendly conditions.[/quote'] so we go back to the 90s? are you saying that? Why even stop at the 90s, lets go all the way back to the 1930s Quite frankly its loser fans like you who accept crap which has led to this status quo.
CSK Fan Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 You have a short memory or lack of knowledge of cricket history. Indian team which had Sachin' date=' Dravid, Ganguly etc got bowled out for 100 and 66 in a test match in South Africa once. This Indian side almost won a game at Joburg in their first tour of SA in seamer friendly conditions.[/quote'] Look at the English record I quoted above. And you have to be kidding if you had no idea about that pitch. We always use to get better as the series progressed and we got used to the conditions, not the other way around like here
NareshK Posted August 16, 2014 Author Posted August 16, 2014 Look at the English record I quoted above. And you have to be kidding if you had no idea about that pitch. We always use to get better as the series progressed and we got used to the conditions' date=' not the other way around like here[/quote'] There were English sides in the past which were much weaker than this side. They were a dreadful side in the 90s and yet India couldnt win a single test against them. I think we should be patient with this side when they are playing overseas. They have the potential and will take some time to adapt and become consistent. I feel some people are going overboard with their criticism.
yoda Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Look at the English record I quoted above. And you have to be kidding if you had no idea about that pitch. We always use to get better as the series progressed and we got used to the conditions' date=' not the other way around like here[/quote'] Forget the record, this English side's bowling has been fantastic. Yes our team has been pathetic, but let's not keep putting the English side down. They bowl at the right areas with pace and movement and yes Moin Ali has been pretty good too.
NareshK Posted August 16, 2014 Author Posted August 16, 2014 so we go back to the 90s? are you saying that? Why even stop at the 90s, lets go all the way back to the 1930s Quite frankly its loser fans like you who accept crap which has led to this status quo. Hey idiot, I don't write stupid irrational over emotional messages like you or some idiots here. I'm talking about looking at things in a rational manner rather than saying Indian cricket is dead or current players don't have any motivation to play test cricket or something stupid like that. You have to look at the context of Indian team when they play overseas and how difficult it has traditionally been before launching into a diatribe.
special K Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Yes, we've always humiliated India. India is a minnow to England.
CSK Fan Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Yes' date=' we've always humiliated India. India is a minnow to England.[/quote'] Always? Don't think so special K. Since your appearance here is directly proportional to England beating us, your prolonged leaves of absence tells it's own story
special K Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 Always? Don't think so special K. Since your appearance here is directly proportional to England beating us' date=' your prolonged leaves of absence tells it's own story[/quote'] We weren't playing you in January, February, March, April, May or June or we'd have also beaten you then.
FischerTal Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 ^ you were hiding when ishant sharma of all people bounced out your team on an english pitch.
NareshK Posted August 16, 2014 Author Posted August 16, 2014 Yes' date=' we've always humiliated India. India is a minnow to England.[/quote'] You are a minnow in India as well. It took you 28 years to win a test series in India before 2012. :cantstop: Not to mention consistently getting whitewashed in ODI series and losing to Bangladesh and Ireland in World Cup in India.
Straight Drive Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 The results show everyone else is playing better cricket than us overseas. I think we have only won 1 in 14 overseas matches or so ? Process is a lame excuse for such dismal results. Play better cricket and we will win more. The worst is we even lost to England who couldn't play spin in India over decades.
NareshK Posted August 16, 2014 Author Posted August 16, 2014 The results show everyone else is playing better cricket than us overseas. I think we have only won 1 in 14 overseas matches or so ? Process is a lame excuse for such dismal results. Play better cricket and we will win more. Not true. Traditionally, Aus, SA and Eng have been tough places for SC teams. India, Pak have each won only 5 tests in Aus and 2 tests in SA. India have won 6 tests in England while Pak won 9. Sri Lanka have won much less. Eng has also struggled in India. Only Aus and SA have done bit better all around the world.
Lord Posted August 16, 2014 Posted August 16, 2014 1) Why don't you look at England's recent records too? England also was at it's most weakest 2) Most of India's wins have come in the last decade, where we have been on an upward swing 3) We may lose or not, but it is the lack of the effort and basics which hurt more. Along with lack of hunger. If they had given their best and lost not one person would complain about the young team I agree completely to the positives. But it is no co-incidence all of those positives including Bhuvi's performance happened in the first couple of matches, Dhoni couldn't keep the team motivated, there was no plan to have enough bowlers in the squad to rotate them I completely agree with the talent and future prospects of Pujara, Kohli, Rahane as well as Umesh, Aaron and Bhuvi. We will be on track soon. Agree about other points,but it shouldn't require a captain or coach to motivate players to give their best shot in Test cricket
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now