Lord Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 2007 seemed great on paper' date=' as people thought it would reduce the number of unnecessary matches involving associate teams... Backfired really badly[/quote'] no it wasnt great.One bad match shouldnt cost you a place in next round,else have knockouts only,why have league phase
bowl_out Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 no it wasnt great.One bad match shouldnt cost you a place in next round' date='else have knockouts only,why have league phase[/quote'] Yup. Exactly what didn't work... Organizers didn't really expect the top 8 teams to have an off-day against associate teams... Hence the super 8 was planned assuming that it would have only the top 8 teams... Didn't work out well...
Lord Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 Yup. Exactly what didn't work... Organizers didn't really expect the top 8 teams to have an off-day against associate teams... Hence the super 8 was planned assuming that it would have only the top 8 teams... Didn't work out well... Thats why 2003 format was best.Every game had meaning and you didnt get knocked bcoz of one game.Infact SL lost to Kenya but made it to semis
bowl_out Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 Thats why 2003 format was best.Every game had meaning and you didnt get knocked bcoz of one game.Infact SL lost to Kenya but made it to semis Agree. Wonder how South Africa still choked
bulbul Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 2007 format pathetic but 2003 was great If you are not able to beat Bangla or Ireland you cannot blame anyone else...It's not one match loss we lost 2 out of 3.
Sonix768 Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 Agree. Wonder how South Africa still choked The infamous miscalculation.. :cantstop: It was like SA need 7 off 2 balls before the rain break.. Boucher hit a six in the penultimate ball. Last ball he played defensively and refused a single :haha:
bowl_out Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 If you are not able to beat Bangla or Ireland you cannot blame anyone else...It's not one match loss we lost 2 out of 3. It was assumed that the top 8 teams would beat the associates, and the result of match that they play between themselves was unpredictable... India had one bad match against Bangladesh and got chucked out... That was the problem... Even in 1999, they lost against Zim, but still carried on till the Super Six..
Sonix768 Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 2007 format was also good but again it favors the top 8 teams too much. Its like top 8 team round robin match with some associate teams for practice. Combined the facts that * India and Pakistan bungled in the first group itself * All matches start at night and goes till midnight * Australia was utter dominant that they don't even give a sniff to anyone * WI and England were crap along with the two minnows in the Super 8 (Bang did well to beat SA though) which made almost all of Super 8 matches one sided we tend to believe the format is too lengthy but in real both 2007 and 2003 lasted same duration.
bulbul Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 It was assumed that the top 8 teams would beat the associates, and the result of match that they play between themselves was unpredictable... India had one bad match against Bangladesh and got chucked out... That was the problem... Even in 1999, they lost against Zim, but still carried on till the Super Six.. When you have to win 1 match against SL or Bangla and if you fail to do so you cant blame any one.
Sachin=GOD Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 @Mods - plz make this a sticky thread now. Only 15 days to go for the WC.
Lord Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 @Mods - plz make this a sticky thread now. Only 15 days to go for the WC. Will do it after the auctions.Already six threads stickied
Sidhoni Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 Will do it after the auctions.Already six threads stickied I would say this thread is more important.
Lord Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 I would say this thread is more important. Not as of now.Auction threads are way more active
StriKe Posted January 29, 2015 Author Posted January 29, 2015 ESPNcricinfo @ESPNcricinfo 1m1 minute ago Nikita Miller will replace Sunil Narine in West Indies' World Cup squad.
bowl_out Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 ESPNcricinfo @ESPNcricinfo 1m1 minute ago Nikita Miller will replace Sunil Narine in West Indies' World Cup squad. Nikita? :cantstop: I thought we were talking about Men's World Cup :haha:
Sonix768 Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 Nikita Miller? He was very poor in his first stint of international career. I thought Shillingford could replace him but may be he still has dodgy actions. And whatever happened to Davendra Bishoo?
brendan07 Posted January 30, 2015 Posted January 30, 2015 Nikita Miller? He was very poor in his first stint of international career. I thought Shillingford could replace him but may be he still has dodgy actions. And whatever happened to Davendra Bishoo? Isn't Shillingford doing the remodelling of his action still?
bulbul Posted January 30, 2015 Posted January 30, 2015 Cmy-s5Klvoo :hatsoff: If its not staged just imagine that kids feelings at that moment.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now