Crookbond Posted December 13, 2014 Posted December 13, 2014 Sachin didnt oppose it,just wanted it to be more consistent http://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/41671/not-against-drs-sachin-tendulkar In this autobiography, Tendulkar is pretty clear that DRS should be consistent AND also be close to 100% accurate.
Lord Posted December 13, 2014 Posted December 13, 2014 In this autobiography' date=' Tendulkar is pretty clear that DRS should be consistent [b']AND also be close to 100% accurate. Likes of Dhoni and Kohli have said they won't take it until its absolutely 100%,not close to.Not sure Sachin has said something like that
Marut Posted December 13, 2014 Posted December 13, 2014 Don't think DRS has to become perfect before it can be used. All you need to do is to verify whether the ratio of correct decisions with DRS to correct decisions without DRS exceeds 1. I am sure that is easily true.
21cent Posted December 13, 2014 Posted December 13, 2014 Well you see, if you have the DRS, you cant cry wolf about unfair decisions. Since the DRS, being a unbiased algorithm will equally be fair and unfair to all teams. But BCCI dont want none of that, They want to be able to whine each chance they get and bully umpires with the threat of retirement.
Crookbond Posted December 13, 2014 Posted December 13, 2014 Likes of Dhoni and Kohli have said they won't take it until its absolutely 100%' date='not close to.Not sure Sachin has said something like that[/quote'] Nope, close to 100%. Page 730 Excerpt From: Sachin Tendulkar. “Playing It My Way: My Autobiography.
Lord Posted December 13, 2014 Posted December 13, 2014 Nope, close to 100%. Page 730 Excerpt From: Sachin Tendulkar. “Playing It My Way: My Autobiography. He's using 'we' instead of 'I'.Seems hes conveying a collective BCCI or team's stance,not necessarily his own :hmmm:
Crookbond Posted December 13, 2014 Posted December 13, 2014 He's using 'we' instead of 'I'.Seems hes conveying a collective BCCI or team's stance' date='not necessarily his own :hmmm:[/quote'] Read the book, we means the team leaders and seniors - Kumble, Dhoni, Laxman
adi B Posted December 13, 2014 Posted December 13, 2014 India have to use the drs because umpires are erratic nowadays and u see quite a lot of howlers given in per test match.drs will surely help India, plenty of 50-50 decisions go against us I have noticed
bowl_out Posted December 14, 2014 Posted December 14, 2014 India have to use the drs because umpires are erratic nowadays and u see quite a lot of howlers given in per test match.drs will surely help India' date=' plenty of 50-50 decisions go against us I have noticed[/quote'] DRS is not for 50-50 decisions. If India go with DRS to resolve these decisions, they will be screwed as the Third umpire will stick to the decision of the on-field umpires in these cases... DRS is to resolve howlers, the decisions like Dhawan, Rahane or Warner.... even Kohli's lbw to an extent... I think we need to go back to using at least Hotspot like we did in 2011.... But only after ICC prioritize the factors that the 3rd umpire should take into consideration while reviewing such decisions... Hawkeye is questionable, as the projection of trajectory of the ball after hitting the pad is always dubious.... For LBW decisions, DRS should primarily be used to check for : balls pitching outside leg, striking batsman outside the line of the stumps, and inside edges... Whether the ball will go on to hit the stumps or not should be left for the umpires to take a call
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now