vijay50 Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 This I discussed in match thread. SA made the tactical blunder of bowling first after winning the toss. How stupid was that? Knowing that Pak cannot chase anything above 250 and rain can make chasing under lights difficult. You never see SL make these kind of tactical blunders.So stupid ABD. Also ABD bowling along with Duminy and shift the momentum completely in favour of Pak. Now that cornered tiger is awoken, teams definitely need better strategy against Pakistan. They are beatable but dont give them what they like, which is batting first.
amiret Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 You will never see Aus make such blunders. Also Aus will not persist with non performers like Duminy for years .(apart from Watson)
CSK Fan Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 You will never see Aus make such blunders. Also Aus will not persist with non performers like Duminy for years .(apart from Watson) I think they are keeping Duminy because he is the only batsman who does not lose it completely while chasing
Malcolm Merlyn Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 Big blunder.You win toss you bat first in a day night game.Always!
NareshK Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 What bollocks. In a rain affected game, you always chase because you know the DL equation and also the ball gets wet because of the outfield. Bowling part timers was a blunder but they had no choice because they didnt have a 5th bowler.
MK55 Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 The game changer were the runs conceded by ABD/Duminy. Poor batting also contributed but there was such huge disparity between the performance of the part timers and the regular bowlers Also ABD din't attack Younus using body line tactic but instead brought himself to bowl and then Duminy
MCGGG Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 I don't think it was a blunder, he knows his team are probably going to made to chase in the finals, why not replicate that scenario in an unimportant group match?
envy99_2000 Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 Yes it was a blunder against a team which cannot chase more then 250
G_B_ Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 I don't think it was a blunder' date=' he knows his team are probably going to made to chase in the finals, why not replicate that scenario in an unimportant group match?[/quote'] I sort of agree with this Drop De Coq and let AB keep and further bolster either the batting or the bowling. Its going to be a net gain anyways for SA.
bulbul Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 It's just usual choke..SA going out in QF as they have very unbalanced side. Now they have to drop Deckok and make AB keeper, move Riley to opening and play 5th bowler.
sourab10forever Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 Maybe SA will win this cuz the 'choke' is over.:dontknow:
Cricketfanatic Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 Maybe SA will win this cuz the 'choke' is over.:dontknow: Chokers can only choke choke choke.
KFC_Zinger Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 I don't think it was a blunder' date=' he knows his team are probably going to made to chase in the finals, why not replicate that scenario in an unimportant group match?[/quote'] If SL beats Aus Tom, then ABDV's world cup might be over in Adelaide next week...
NareshK Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 If SL beats Aus Tom' date=' then [b']ABDV's world cup might be over in Adelaide next week... They probably deserve it too.
adi B Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 It was a blunder all right but still 232 should be chased 8/10 Times in nzl.the ball did move under lights even wasim acknowledged and the pak pacers bowled with heart no doubt but some of the shots played by jpd,russouw were not at all required at that stage.they looked in a hurry trying to go for the shots against a quality attack and fell apart. Another thing to be noticed is that saf had 4 lefties in their batting line up today and they were taken apart by the 3 left armers of pak,basically they played right into their hands,just imagine what zak (at his prime) would have done to the saffers today
govinda Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 and some people compere king dhoni with abcd:hysterical:
vvvslaxman Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 Even after all the blunders the target was not beyond reacch. They were in commanding position at 67 for 1 in 9.3 overs.. meaning they needed another 160 odd in 30 overs with 9 wickets in hand. Should have been a walk in the park on this tiny ground.
addicted4444 Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 They won't be chokers if they lose in the knockouts after having lost multiple times in the group stages.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now