Donny Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 5fer for ishant' date=' he has virutally booked his ticket to australia :two_thumbs_up:[/quote'] Yes please. :regular_smile: Claimed none of the top 5 bats.
MundaPakistani Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Yes please. :regular_smile: Claimed none of the top 5 bats. deserved atleast 2 more.
SachDan Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 IS has virtually booked his place with today's scintillting performance...Thats cricket for you...I thought he bowled better yesterday but had a lone wicket to show.. today ? As for the fifth fast bowler.. I will have Agarkar than Munaf.. MP's presence on the outfield it self is a demoralising sight and that's the last thing u want against Aussies.
Guest BossBhai Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user --
Mr. Wicket Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 As for the fifth fast bowler.. I will have Agarkar than Munaf.. MP's presence on the outfield it self is a demoralising sight and that's the last thing u want against Aussies. This is in stark contrast to Agarkar. With Aag, his presence on the outfield is a pleasing sight. His presence at the bowling crease though is a demoralising sight.
Holysmoke Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Yes please. :regular_smile: Claimed none of the top 5 bats. You need to see what bench strength we have.. I'd rather have him than munaf.. or VRV singh. Donny, you dont quite understand how useless those guys are.
SachDan Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 This is in stark contrast to Agarkar. With Aag, his presence on the outfield is a pleasing sight. His presence at the bowling crease though is a demoralising sight. Salil, I know how big a critic you are of AA but on any given day I will pick him ahead of MP just bcoz of MP's body language on the field.
Mr. Wicket Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 So would I, except that I think Aag may be injured right now as he isn't playing for Bombay. Still, I just couldn't pass up the chance to take a shot at Aag. :D
donkey Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Voted no....preserve him...nourish him...but dont injure him
The Outsider Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Yes please. :regular_smile: Claimed none of the top 5 bats. I thought you were a neutral cricket fan, then why would you have one team selecting a bowler not able to take top order wickets when playing another?
Donny Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 You thought ? Maybe you should re-read my posts then, shwetabh, instead of these rather tiresome attempts to trip me up.
The Outsider Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 You thought ? Maybe you should re-read my posts then' date=' shwetabh, instead of these rather tiresome attempts to trip me up.[/quote'] Ooops, my bad! For you an "Aussie cricket fan" means a cricket fan living in Australia.
Mr. Wicket Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Christ, can the two of you stop derailing this so we can get back to ripping on Grandfather Munaf and He With the Fire in his Eyes and Gas in the Belly? :D
Donny Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Ooops' date=' my bad! For you an "Aussie cricket fan" means a cricket fan living in Australia.[/quote'] No. Won't work. You can't wriggle out that easily. :regular_smile: For anyone, an Aussie cricket fan, an English cricket fan, a New Zealand cricket fan etc. can mean either they are fans of their country's team or fans of cricket who live in that particular country. Now, that's not really a difficult concept to grasp, is it ? I've repeatedly made it clear which one I am.
Donny Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Apologies, Salil. Past my bedtime anyway. Can't wait till my team buries Tasmania tomorrow.
The Outsider Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 No. Won't work. You can't wriggle out that easily. :regular_smile: For anyone, an Aussie cricket fan, an English cricket fan, a New Zealand cricket fan etc. can mean either they are fans of their country 's team or fans of cricket who live in that particular country. Now, that's not really a difficult concept to grasp, is it ? I've repeatedly made it clear which one I am. Yes, you have that you are a cricket fan living in Australia. "Your" team is Victoria. Hence my question, in a neutral contest between India and Australia why would you want one side to pick a bowler who did not pick up top order wickets in his most recent outing? The thread is in context of the India-Australia test series and not the tour game against "your" team, BTW. Also, can you find me some instances where "X Y fan" where X=Country/State etc. and Y= sport is used to say a fan of Y living in X in some reputed magazine etc.
beetle Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Yes...yes! If it means not having a seat left for Agarkar on that plane...then that itself makes him worth it and more.....
Mr. Wicket Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Past my bedtime anyway. Can't wait till my team buries Tasmania tomorrow. Hope none of their players fall over their trousers!
Cricketics Posted December 11, 2007 Author Posted December 11, 2007 So i Won the bet.. Ishant performed... Well Done Sharma Ji
DesiChap Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Ishant has booked his ticket to Aus with his 5-fer yesterday
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now