flamy Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: He prolly thot they were on a break or smth while the referees were deciding. :phehehe:
Precambrian Posted May 30, 2015 Posted May 30, 2015 That can't be a goal, can it? One of the players is still on the ground. Ridiculous. The goalie is not to be blamed here even for an iota.
Texan Posted May 30, 2015 Author Posted May 30, 2015 That can't be a goal, can it? One of the players is still on the ground. Ridiculous. The goalie is not to be blamed here even for an iota. This was no official break. He should have been alert. The opposition had a free kick and they duly scored. Perhaps watching so much cricket, one might think that the referee would call a dead ball :cantstop:
Crookbond Posted June 1, 2015 Posted June 1, 2015 That can't be a goal, can it? One of the players is still on the ground. Ridiculous. The goalie is not to be blamed here even for an iota. This is just sh1t referee. First, it should have been a direct free kick not indirect as taken. Second, the start of play has to be a whistle - I just can't hear it. Finally, when a player is on the ground - it is an unsaid code to hit the ball "outside". Once the player is back on his feet, the throw is taken by the opposition and the ball is fed to the original team who had possession.
BeautifulGame Posted June 1, 2015 Posted June 1, 2015 This is just sh1t referee. First' date=' it should have been a direct free kick not indirect as taken. Second, the start of play has to be a whistle - I just can't hear it. Finally, when a player is on the ground - it is an unsaid code to hit the ball "outside". Once the player is back on his feet, the throw is taken by the opposition and the ball is fed to the original team who had possession.[/quote'] Nope.There is no rule it has to be a direct free kick or u have to wait for the whistle.Its upto the attacking team to choose http://news.bbc.co.uk/sportacademy/hi/sa/football/features/newsid_3409000/3409567.stm Henry did almost similar few years back gCWjioIR5MM Also there is too much feigning of injury so fifa recently said play to the whistle of referee unless its a head injury.
Precambrian Posted June 1, 2015 Posted June 1, 2015 This was no official break. He should have been alert. The opposition had a free kick and they duly scored. Perhaps watching so much cricket, one might think that the referee would call a dead ball :cantstop: The guy injured is still lyin on the ground.
Crookbond Posted June 1, 2015 Posted June 1, 2015 Nope.There is no rule it has to be a direct free kick or u have to wait for the whistle.Its upto the attacking team to choose http://news.bbc.co.uk/sportacademy/hi/sa/football/features/newsid_3409000/3409567.stm Henry did almost similar few years back gCWjioIR5MM Also there is too much feigning of injury so fifa recently said play to the whistle of referee unless its a head injury. Lets first settle the direct free kick. A direct free kick is to be awarded if the opponent is pushed, jumps or tackles. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/rules_and_equipment/4200940.stm
BeautifulGame Posted June 1, 2015 Posted June 1, 2015 Lets first settle the direct free kick. A direct free kick is to be awarded if the opponent is pushed, jumps or tackles. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/rules_and_equipment/4200940.stm Yes buts its upto the attacking team to choose whether they want a direct free kick or not With a free-kick around the penalty area, we always ask the players whether they want it quick or slow. This is their window of opportunity to surprise the defence. There is nothing in the laws of the game that say we have to indicate for the free-kick to be taken. For the whistle There is nothing in the laws of the game that say we have to indicate for the free-kick to be taken. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sportacademy/hi/sa/football/features/newsid_3409000/3409567.stm
BeautifulGame Posted June 1, 2015 Posted June 1, 2015 We have to understand the difference between a Quick Free Kick(QFK) and a Ceremonial Free Kick(CFK) which was made clear by USSF's "Free Kick and Restart Management." A quick free kick can be taken by the attacking side in any situation without notifying the referee either verbally or visually and after ensuring there is a distance of at least 10 yards from an opposition player so as not to block the movement of play. Ceremonial free kick on the other hand are taken only on the referee's whistle after he's ensured the wall is at a distance of 10 yards from the ball. The report goes on to say that the ceremonial free kick only be taken in the following situations : 1. Yellow/red card had been handed out prior to the kick. 2. A trainer was required to come on to the field. 3. The attacking team asks for the distance of 10 yards be enforced. 4. Referee decides to slow down the tempo of the game. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/213166-quick-free-kick-whats-the-rule
Texan Posted June 1, 2015 Author Posted June 1, 2015 The guy injured is still lyin on the ground. Check out BG's links. Unless there is a severe injury requiring urgent medical attention, attacking team does not have to wait. Otherwise, defending team will always have a guy on his back as soon as a free kick is awarded so they can get their defenders strategically placed. Besides, reports indicate the club fined their goalkeeper and are mulling over dropping him from the team. So, they clearly think it is the goalie's fault not the referee's.
Crookbond Posted June 2, 2015 Posted June 2, 2015 Yes buts its upto the attacking team to choose whether they want a direct free kick or not For the whistle http://news.bbc.co.uk/sportacademy/hi/sa/football/features/newsid_3409000/3409567.stm You seem to be right. Page 51 of this FIFA document clears it. http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_5_the_referee_en_47411.pdf
Recommended Posts