Dil Dil India Posted February 5, 2016 Author Posted February 5, 2016 Typical Sachin boys; 100 is everything... match-winning contribution hardly matters... LOL @ reconsidering the evaluation...So lets just forget his countless 30-40 odd match-winning runs along humongous amount of 83 fifties, batted #4,5 in almost all of his career...(just thinking how we can break-up ODI tons of Misbah... May be we should not even consider him as a batsman then)Typical Afridi fanboys who comment without understanding the intricacies of the discussion. I am talking about the break up of his hundreds. It's not that only hundreds matter, it's more to do with why Inzy(greatest player of fast bowling as proclaimed and proved by the great PTI leader and ex husband of Reham Khan, Imran Khan himself) could only score centuries vs Ind/SL and Zimbabwe but not against Australia, South Africa, etc. Misbah does not have hundreds at all so the question of a break up does not arise. If you want to make use of sarcasm at least make sure you have fully understood what you are arguing for.
Debutant Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Nothing surprising. He was a FFTB - Fat Flat Track Bully adi B 1
express bowling Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Nothing surprising. He was a FFTB - Fat Flat Track Bully
adi B Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 Nothing surprising. He was a FFTB - Fat Flat Track Bully
cric_fan Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 i am a bit surprised to see that in ODIs .....Inzamam averages just 26 in Australia, 27 in South Africa 24 in NZ and 34 in England. That is poor.http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/40570.html?class=2;template=results;type=battingIn tests he averages 30 in Australia and 31 in South Africa http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/40570.html?class=1;template=results;type=batting Poor indeed. Overrated.
Vijy Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 he batted mostly at 5, how many batsmen batting at 5 have more tons?ABDV has batted mostly at 4 (or 5) I think. Has lots of tons.
Vijy Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 As posters have noted, it's not Inzi's lack of tons, but the skewed averages. I'd rather take Dravid (even in ODIs) over Inzi since they were both middle order bats, have somewhat similar records; besides, Dravid had other skills (slips, part-time keeping, etc).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now