Has there been a player more cringy than Hardik Pandya?

[Stuge]

2 minutes ago, UrmiSinhaRay said:

Why do many of these players do portfolios like this?.
With his potbelly, RoFat Sharma is not gonna have a shot at modelling LMAOOO

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk
 

No idea why they do that ...Must be shoot for some advertisement or something

[UrmiSinhaRay]

No idea why they do that ...Must be shoot for some advertisement or something

Yeah...some of the popular players do a lot of "scintillating" shoots for Men's Magazines...but None of them are Beckham or CR7 Level.


Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk

[Ankit_sharma03]

3 hours ago, Khota said:

Is that ok with you?

ofcourse thats how it shud be 

u think its fine to compare two games who has diff sizes of ball 

[Khota]

17 hours ago, philcric said:

 

Yes. Plenty.

 

Ever heard of a concept called team balance ? The same player being 5th bowler AND 7th batter is good value, gives the team a balance. If you replace that player with a batsman/bowler, it will weaken bowling/batting.

 

This is another example of you going tangential. From Pandya can't bowl based on scorecard of one match to ... but does he really belong (when ipl 2018 season stats shows he bowled and batted well across 13 games) to ... oh he is the 'worst' because he is the 5th bowler and the 7th batter in the team.

 

How does someone who is the worst bowler and batsman provide balance? I have to grant he had a good IPL .

[Ankit_sharma03]

3 minutes ago, Khota said:

How does someone who is the worst bowler and batsman provide balance? I have to grant he had a good IPL .

how is he the worst bowler n worst batsman????? the guy almost scored a 100 in SA , whereas ur so called best batsman dhawan rohit has had 2 our n are yet to score a 50 their. 

HE takes a wkt every game , which is pretty much bhuvneshwar kumar stats .

 

Prove my frend factually how is he the worst batsman n bowler ???

[Khota]

14 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

ofcourse thats how it shud be 

u think its fine to compare two games who has diff sizes of ball 

It is skill set I am talking about. You cannot master two different crafts at that level.

[Khota]

8 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

how is he the worst bowler n worst batsman????? the guy almost scored a 100 in SA , whereas ur so called best batsman dhawan rohit has had 2 our n are yet to score a 50 their. 

HE takes a wkt every game , which is pretty much bhuvneshwar kumar stats .

 

Prove my frend factually how is he the worst batsman n bowler ???

He had one fluky inning in SA. he was a bust. Go look it up. Google is your friend.

[sriniwu]

while the merits of hardik pandya are debate worthy, he is the best "all-rounder" option we have ( the others being jadeja, krunal pandya).. if the management goes in with the view that he will give away 60-70 runs per 10 overs, but, fetch you wickets in the middle overs, it would ease a lot of mental pressure of him as well. his fielding & big hitting is a plus...also, jaddu is not there now or prbly in the WC to run him out again when in the "zone"

[Ankit_sharma03]

Just now, Khota said:

It is skill set I am talking about. You cannot master two different crafts at that level.

ur calling someone worst n expecting someone to master a skill

Their is a huge diff between worst n master, ur calling him worst which is like a liability 

 

So how on earth is he worst . 

HE does enough for the team by doing two jobs even if he doesnt do it like a master . Its like having 2 players in one , they may not be master but offering 2 skills toghter infact incase of pandya ill say they offer more then many specialist 

 

Thats is why in Sa test series his contribution was a lot and even to indian cricket he has given a gr8 balance in Last one year . Same is the case with MI as both pandya bros emerganance has made them a gr8 side 

[Khota]

17 hours ago, philcric said:

 

They have been pointed out plenty of times by many here.

 

About all-rounders, about test keepers (Saha/Parthiv), about test openers.

 

 

 

I was right about openers. I was right about wkt kprs. I am pretty much right about most of the things.

 

Cricket when it was an amature sport could affort all rounders. It is a specialist sport now and no one has the time to be good at both batting and bowling. anamolies may happen but you will not see a pattern.

 

look at football and the level of sophistication. Every player has a very specialised role and the strikers get most of the goals. There are specialist at evey positions. Dfeender may get a goal but he is never the striker.

[Ankit_sharma03]

3 minutes ago, Khota said:

He had one fluky inning in SA. he was a bust. Go look it up. Google is your friend.

ur specialist has even failed to play one fluke innings , means dhawan are rohit are worse that cnt even get a fluke 50 forget a 90 

Please find me on google that pandya 90+ in Sa was a fluke 

[Khota]

6 minutes ago, sriniwu said:

while the merits of hardik pandya are debate worthy, he is the best "all-rounder" option we have ( the others being jadeja, krunal pandya).. if the management goes in with the view that he will give away 60-70 runs per 10 overs, but, fetch you wickets in the middle overs, it would ease a lot of mental pressure of him as well. his fielding & big hitting is a plus...also, jaddu is not there now or prbly in the WC to run him out again when in the "zone"

He is the best India has but that does not mean he merits a spot. I love his fioelding skills and his athleticism.

[Khota]

3 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

ur specialist has even failed to play one fluke innings , means dhawan are rohit are worse that cnt even get a fluke 50 forget a 90 

Please find me on google that pandya 90+ in Sa was a fluke 

What did he do after that fluke/ Did he show any consistency. Only in this alternate universe you can compare Dhawan and Pandya in batting. Are you even serious?

[Ankit_sharma03]

1 minute ago, Khota said:

I was right about openers. I was right about wkt kprs. I am pretty much right about most of the things.

 

Cricket when it was an amature sport could affort all rounders. It is a specialist sport now and no one has the time to be good at both batting and bowling. anamolies may happen but you will not see a pattern.

Yet most teams be it around world or franchise cricket uses a lot of bits n pieces cricket 

1 minute ago, Khota said:

 

look at football and the level of sophistication. Every player has a very specialised role and the strikers get most of the goals. There are specialist at evey positions. Dfeender may get a goal but he is never the striker.

again football, u dnt even the diff of the sizes of ball and ur mixing sport

 

Try out or in swinging this ball 

 

or try playing this shot 

 

with this ball

 

 

and when u do it successfully , give me ur crap theory 

[sriniwu]

Just now, Khota said:

He is the best India has but that does not mean he merits a spot. I love his fioelding skills and his athleticism.

i hold the same view.. but, every captain would like to have a genuine all-rounder in the team to open up various combo's..and knowing kohli, pandya is a permanent fixture

[Ankit_sharma03]

1 minute ago, Khota said:

What did he do after that fluke/ Did he show any consistency. Only in this alternate universe you can compare Dhawan and Pandya in batting. Are you even serious?

m not comparing both , but drilling ur stupid logic

coz u wanted a specialist dhawan in test team n not pandya

Dhawan didnt do jackshit n pandya made runs took wkts 

 

So the question is what did ur specialist do ,

Are u serious calling someone runs fluke, if flukes are that easy tell why havent the specialist got the flukes 

[Pollack]

Its true Pandya needs to do a lot more with bat and /ball.Also true is he provides balance to the team. So he is not going anywhere. His fielding is bonus too. 

[MechEng]

I am not a big fan of Pandya, saw him as a talented player for sure but he won me over with his 76 in CT final, the way he was hitting sixes indicated that he was going for the win even when we were some 6 batsmen down and if Jadeja had not run out himself the game could have been closer maybe.

Edited June 29, 2018 by MechEng

[UrmiSinhaRay]

I am not a big fan of Pandya, saw him as a talented player for sure but he won me over with his 76 in CT final, the way he was hitting sixes indicated that he was going for the win even when we were some 6 batsmen down and if Jadeja had not run out himself the game could have been closer maybe.

TBH, Pandya reminds me of Ranveer Singh.
Wannabe but at the same time effervescent and energetic.
I guess regardless him being cringeworthy and wannabe , he is fun to be around.

One big plus of Pandya is he is very very confident.
So confident that sometimes it backfires on him.

But a huge problem he faces and that is , he is not much brainy.
Yes , he has the skills and is a decent enough player but often his cricketing brain misfunctions.
He goes by his intuitions and keeps faith in his instincts , which is a good thing but he is not a brainy dude for sure.

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk

[MechEng]

1 hour ago, UrmiSinhaRay said:

 

 

TBH, Pandya reminds me of Ranveer Singh.
Wannabe but at the same time effervescent and energetic.
I guess regardless him being cringeworthy and wannabe , he is fun to be around.

One big plus of Pandya is he is very very confident.
So confident that sometimes it backfires on him.

But a huge problem he faces and that is , he is not much brainy.
Yes , he has the skills and is a decent enough player but often his cricketing brain misfunctions.
He goes by his intuitions and keeps faith in his instincts , which is a good thing but he is not a brainy dude for sure.

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk
 

 

Non brainy chalta hai, sportsmen don't need to be smart. Kaunsa differential equations usko solve karna hai?