zen Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 Chasing 335, SL made 87/0 in PP. Brought RRR down from 6.7 to only 6.2! Some of the other teams would have seen the RRR creep up to 7+. Reminded me of SL of the 90s! Link to comment
maniac Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 The takeaway is that it took a team with no responsibility and nothing to lose to get away with an amazing start. Teams that are in with a chance are playing more responsible and conservative game. Obviously being more successful in that process as well. Link to comment
zen Posted June 15, 2019 Author Share Posted June 15, 2019 Just now, maniac said: The takeaway is that it took a team with no responsibility and nothing to lose to get away with an amazing start. Teams that are in with a chance are playing more responsible and conservative game. Obviously being more successful in that process as well. No team has chased 330+ in WCs so far Link to comment
maniac Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 Just now, zen said: No team has chased 330+ in WCs so far Yes. England came close though but they suffered because top order played irresponsible shots. Had they built a good platform it was there for the taking :) Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, maniac said: The takeaway is that it took a team with no responsibility and nothing to lose to get away with an amazing start. Teams that are in with a chance are playing more responsible and conservative game. Obviously being more successful in that process as well. We reached 352 after being 40/0 lol Teams that finish the game well always win. Australia finished with a wimper. They collapsed in the end. Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 Just now, maniac said: Yes. England came close though but they suffered because top order played irresponsible shots. Had they built a good platform it was there for the taking :) yup Reverse sweep against Rashid. That set them back. Even with strong batting line up they couldn't gun down the chase. Link to comment
zen Posted June 15, 2019 Author Share Posted June 15, 2019 (edited) 25 minutes ago, maniac said: Yes. England came close though but they suffered because top order played irresponsible shots. Had they built a good platform it was there for the taking :) "Irresponsible" is a subjective topic. Rohit has an FCA of 2.5 while playing blocking shots PS if Eng were chasing 330 odd, it could have won. Made 334 chasing 349 Edited June 15, 2019 by zen Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 Srilanka 87, 48, 41 in three blocks India 41, 70, 59 in three blocks Link to comment
zen Posted June 15, 2019 Author Share Posted June 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Srilanka 87, 48, 41 in three blocks India 41, 70, 59 in three blocks Why are you posting Ind's totals? And when the thread is about batting in PPs? Link to comment
jusarrived Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said: Srilanka 87, 48, 41 in three blocks India 41, 70, 59 in three blocks Big difference chasing and setting a total . Lankans just messed up an easy chase after getting a great start Link to comment
zen Posted June 15, 2019 Author Share Posted June 15, 2019 Other good performances in PP NZ 77/0 vs SL Pak 69/0 vs Eng Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 1 minute ago, jusarrived said: Big difference chasing and setting a total . Lankans just messed up an easy chase after getting a great start Difference. No ability to score at that pace outside power play. We have that advantage. If Rohit, Kohli are still around 30th over chasing 300 i back them to chase it down. All 350 plus chases were done with the help of Kohli. He didn't exactly go boom boom at the start. He always picked up the pace only later in the innings. Even the recent Australia's successful 350 chase against India was achieved by death over hitting. Keeping the wickets and going after lesser bowlers in the middle is a smart strategy for teams like us. Bottomline is you should never concede 350 in the first place. No team has chased 300 plus successfully in this world cup England failed, Windies failed, Pakistan failed, Australia failed, SA failed (Twice) Chasing is very hard in world cup. Link to comment
zen Posted June 15, 2019 Author Share Posted June 15, 2019 (edited) 49 minutes ago, jusarrived said: Big difference chasing and setting a total . Lankans just messed up an easy chase after getting a great start Agree. If a side is chasing a big score, it is established that conditions are good for batting (or have improved) so a good start is important. SL displayed that scoring big and quickly is not mutually exclusive for those who claim to be good batsmen For Ind, Dhawan (unfortunately not fit atm) and Kohli play at a good/acceptable rate till they reach 50. Only Rohit is the problem: View overall figures [change view] Primary team India Start of match date greater than or equal to 15 Jun 2017 Runs scored less than or equal to 50 Batting position between 1 and 3 Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 300 Ordered by runs scored (descending) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 3 of 3 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s S Dhawan 2017-2019 36 36 0 723 49 20.08 804 89.92 0 0 3 109 8 V Kohli 2017-2019 22 22 3 566 46* 29.78 726 77.96 0 0 1 49 3 RG Sharma 2017-2019 28 28 0 369 48 13.17 593 62.22 0 0 3 37 11 Edited June 15, 2019 by zen Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now