Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Yes thats called the mentality of those educated in Indian history, unlike you. 

No reasoning has been provided , only blank assertions from you.

Sorry but until you can presentreasoning behind your assertions, we can all see that toy have nothing significant to contribute

India >>>> Bharat for all who care about our cultural history 

The mentality has been discussed including foreign inclinations :lol:  

 

Bharat should be predominant as discussed 

 

and of course you have it in you to make claims on behalf on an organization without even having in you to mention your name and position (another reflection on the mentality discussed) :rolleyes: 

 

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, zen said:

The mentality has been discussed including foreign inclinations :lol:  

Thats another of your baseless allegations. The mentality is one of those who know Indian history and know that India/hindh is a more historically significant term even for locals than Bharat 

13 minutes ago, zen said:

Bharat should be predominant as discussed 

India should be predominant as discussed since it is more culturally and historically representative than a solitary Hindu epic 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Thats another of your baseless allegations. The mentality is one of those who know Indian history and know that India/hindh is a more historically significant term even for locals than Bharat 

India should be predominant as discussed since it is more culturally and historically representative than a solitary Hindu epic 

 

That opinion of yours = zilch 

Posted
Just now, zen said:

That opinion of yours = zilch 

Yours is worth even less because you haven’t even supplied justifying reasons or a debate. Nobody here cares for your ignorant opinions either.

 

India >>>>> Bharat for reasons of our cultural history 

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Yours is worth even less because you haven’t even supplied justifying reasons or a debate. Nobody here cares for your ignorant opinions either.

 

India >>>>> Bharat for reasons of our cultural history 

 

Spam alert 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Says the spammer himself who literally made the most useless post ever ( the quoted one). Seems like you have a need to get the last word.

Another spam alert 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Spammer spamming by saying spam alert just to have the last word.:facepalm:

I get alerts when you quote me with your spam :orderorder: .... only quote me if you have a valid point, not the thrown out dumb stuff 

Posted
5 minutes ago, zen said:

I get alerts when you quote me with your spam :orderorder: .... only quote me if you have a valid point, not the thrown out dumb stuff 

Your authority to throw out stuff is rejected since you have no rationale justified or logic behind it.

 

india is more culturally important to us because it’s persianized version hindh/Hindustan has been used by our Hindu ancestors more than Bharat.  Period 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Your authority to throw out stuff is rejected since you have no rationale justified or logic behind it.

 

india is more culturally important to us because it’s persianized version hindh/Hindustan has been used by our Hindu ancestors more than Bharat.  Period 

Spam

Posted
2 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

 

india >> Bharat because India is more representational of our cultural history. 

Majority of Indians doesn’t know India  as regional languages still call India, Bharat. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Majority of Indians doesn’t know India  as regional languages still call India, Bharat. 

It doesn’t change the fact that majority of our literature uses Hindustan, aryadesh and jambhudwip more than Bharat and hindh/Hindustan/India has much greater historical traction than Bharat. It’s due to the local language popularity that Bharat has even been given co-name status. 

 

If it was purely based on what names have the greatest cultural continuity,usage and history, it’d be India/hindh and aryadesh/jambhudwip more than Bharat 

Posted
Just now, Muloghonto said:

It doesn’t change the fact that majority of our literature uses Hindustan, aryadesh and jambhudwip more than Bharat and hindh/Hindustan/India has much greater historical traction than Bharat. It’s due to the local language popularity that Bharat has even been given co-name status. 

 

If it was purely based on what names have the greatest cultural continuity,usage and history, it’d be India/hindh and aryadesh/jambhudwip more than Bharat 

Doubt your assertion about medieval literature,  unless you mean Persian literature Of Moghul period which is not Bharatiya So why didn’t other names stand the test of popularity in regional languages?

Posted
2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Doubt your assertion about medieval literature,  unless you mean Persian literature Of Moghul period which is not Bharatiya So why didn’t other names stand the test of popularity in regional languages?

No, even in bharatiya literature. Samrat hemu’s proclamation was as samrat of Hindustan. Shivaji used Hindustan way more than Bharat. The last historical treaters composed by Kalhana in 12th century uses Hindustan and aryavarta way more than Bharat. 

 

The other names dont stand test test of time ? Hindustan is still just as often used as bharot in Bengali and way more in Hindi.... religion and Mahabharata played the part in making an obscure term like Bharat more popular in the last 200 odd years 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Ok spammer, have the last word, since you can’t present a reasoned argument and justify his reasonings. Superficial Hindus like you are LOL-worthy 

Spam

Posted
30 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

No, even in bharatiya literature. Samrat hemu’s proclamation was as samrat of Hindustan. Shivaji used Hindustan way more than Bharat. The last historical treaters composed by Kalhana in 12th century uses Hindustan and aryavarta way more than Bharat. 

 

The other names dont stand test test of time ? Hindustan is still just as often used as bharot in Bengali and way more in Hindi.... religion and Mahabharata played the part in making an obscure term like Bharat more popular in the last 200 odd years 

Yes, from the 12th century till Shivaji in the 17th century, with proliferation of Indian literature scene with influences from Persian, Turkish languages, Hindustan was more popular, but Sanskrit, regional language literature from at least Kannada and Telugu that I have read,  has maintained Bharatiya influence even in that period. In the 18th century Urdu was the official language in Awadh, people had to fight back British to recognize Hindi. In that scenario, naturally Hindustan will be popular in use and also in literature . But since in mid 1800s onwards, with the freedom struggle movements in Punjab, Bengal, and Maharashtra , Bharat is in use with slogans of Bharatmata ki jai in vogue along with Hindustan zindabad. Hence, the highest civilian award is called BharatRatna and not Taj-e-Hindustan or some such nonsense.

×
×
  • Create New...