Is there a bigger git than Marc Nicholas?

[Desi Cartman]

He is Australiacized

or maybe he just doesn't want to get FIRED

[IndianRenegade]

Has the dash to say it doesn't even out because Symonds was given a more crucial leg before here than his reprieves at Sydney? Isn't their any accountability in commentary??????? Anyhow, :finger:

Thats nonsense! Both were crucial ones.... apart from that, this wasn't as obvious as the reprives Symonds got. it looked certainly out in real time. And bowden rarely gives a LBW, unless he is sure.

[Rajiv]

.lol, apart from the weather..howz life out there Pretty laid back?

[Holysmoke]

Is there a bigger git than Marc Nicholas? Yes. Steve Bucknor.

[Sachinism]

Mark Aussie-Ar$e-Lickolas

[riya]

Mark Aussie-Ar-Lickolas

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

[King Tendulkar]

Told you he was a twat

[Mr. Wicket]

Nicholarse is a pathetic, self absorbed piece of sh*t who isn't worth listening to.

[The Outsider]

The sick fack was sounding more dejected than Slater at the loss, and that's saying something. Is he supposed to be the neutral voice out here?

[Rajan]

I think he was correct. before jumping on me, plz look at it in his point of view. symonds was reprieved in the first innings. here it was similar to Dravid getting a raw decision on 2nd innings at sydney.this was more crucial. i mean, there was some hope for aussies to score more in second innings and try to draw sydney, even if they could have been shot down for less than 200. but here, he was in the 4th innings , there was no way another chance.it does not even out. if u ask Symonds a similar scenario, anyday, he will chose to get out on sydney, IMHO. Now, just chill out. Mark Nicholas is an indian cricket fan, not a member of ICF but general indian cricket!

[The Outsider]

You've lost it Rajan.

[chanakya]

I like Gavaskar's comment :d It not the umpires fault, It Symonds bat, It hardly makes a noise when the ball hits it, Thats why the umpire didn't hear it in Sydnet and the umpire didn't hear it here :D

[SachDan]

Gavaskar was wrong:haha:...his bat's ok...the whole sydney crowd heard the outside edge!!!

[mhr123]

I like Gavaskar's comment :d It not the umpires fault, It Symonds bat, It hardly makes a noise when the ball hits it, Thats why the umpire didn't hear it in Sydnet and the umpire didn't hear it here :D

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:SUNNY IS CHEEKY:D

[mhr123]

http://content-www.cricinfo.com/ausvind/content/current/gallery/332223.html

[msb1991]

Nicholas is not a bad person, he just does not think before he speaks. He speaks in the moment. It is what differs him from the rubbish commentators who commentated on the South Africa Vs West Indies Test match (except Boycott - who is class, but a bit rubbish without support).

[gs]

My vote would be for Ashish Ray. That piece of sh.t can give Nicholas a serious run for his money!

[King Tendulkar]

I like Gavaskar's comment :d It not the umpires fault, It Symonds bat, It hardly makes a noise when the ball hits it, Thats why the umpire didn't hear it in Sydnet and the umpire didn't hear it here :D

brilliant by sunny

[King Tendulkar]

My god I hate Mark Nicholas. He is same as before. So bias towards aussies. Can't stand his commentary! Always praising the aussie players despite them being battered in this test so far!

[Cricketics]

he might be an aussie-lover.. but he isn't doing as bad as others.. he is still good enought to commentate.. atleast 100 times better then those Arun pal and Ramiz Drama..